Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Paul The Super Rugby Oracle's Semifinal Tips: Just How Important Is Home Advantage?

The Ellis Park crowd will be in fine voice for the final

Rugby Pass stats guru Paul Neazor weighs up this weekend’s round of Super Rugby matches and reveals his tips.

ADVERTISEMENT

Like the four remaining Super Rugby franchises, our tipping guru Paul is peaking at the right end of the season. He correctly predicted the four quarterfinals last weekend to nudge his season prediction record to 109/139 or 78%. Here’s what he’s tipping for this weekend’s semifinals.

Hurricanes vs Chiefs
I’m a great believer in home field advantage at this stage of the season. I’m also a believer in the team that has topped the table being better than the one that finished sixth, even if it was really closer than that this season. Neither do I like the idea of picking a side after crossing the Indian Ocean twice in a week – nobody has won the title in 20 years after having to make that trip. Then add in that no New Zealand team has yet lost a home semi, and you get the picture. I don’t fancy the Chiefs chances at all this week, despite them being a good side.

True, the Chiefs did beat the Hurricanes in Wellington back in Round 9, but my recollection is that the Hurricanes did everything possible to lose a game there for the taking – including Jason Woodward shelling Beauden Barrett’s last pass with the line open. The Hurricanes created a dozen or more chances against a team that created (and took) just four, and they dominated the Chiefs at the set-piece all night. In recent weeks the Hurricanes have been the hot team in the competition, and it’s very hard to see them going cold on it now. Even if Dane Coles is ruled out, they are in such a good head space that I can see them winning this one by a bit, and getting hosting rights for the second straight year.
Pick: Hurricanes (13 and over)

 
banner

 

Lions vs Highlanders
This, I think, is the harder of the two games to pick. But I’ll go back to all the points made above about home field, and factor in that the Highlanders haven’t won at Johannesburg since 2005 despite putting up a good fight every time, and come to the same conclusion as before – it’s better to be playing at home at this time of year. Their Round 3 match might look lop-sided in the Highlanders favour but it wasn’t really – it was decided by a couple of moments of brilliance in a killer third quarter, and some of those tries were beyond the capacity of most teams.

The Lions have learned from that, and in recent weeks they have been, along with the Hurricanes, the most dangerous attacking force in the competition. Apart from the game at Buenos Aires which saw the main players stay home, the Lions have scored at least 37 points in their last six wins (all on the Veldt) and play the sort of game the Highlanders normally inflict on the opposition. The home side is quick, dangerous on attack and capable of suffocating defensive pressure, while being well aware of how best to play at altitude. Of all offshore teams, I think the Highlanders have the best game plan for Ellis Park but, despite my admiration for the Southern men, I can’t see past a Lions win.
Pick: Lions (12 and under)

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search