Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Personal attacks on teams and individuals are divisive and unhelpful... it shouldn't be accepted'

(Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Lewis Moody is hoping for a big improvement in Leicester’s Gallagher Premiership form between now and the end of the season – and an end to the personalised abuse that is blighting the sport and society in general.

ADVERTISEMENT

So serious has the issue become in recent times that Tigers even sought police advice last April on how best to handle the matter.

Having finished eleventh place last term, one spot above relegated Newcastle, Leicester’s on-field fortunes haven’t much improved this season. 

Halfway through their 22-match schedule, they again occupy the eleventh spot having won just three of eleven matches and would be favourites for the drop but for Saracens’ automatic relegation for salary cap breaches. 

Moody, the 2003 World Cup winner who spent a dozen season at Welford Road, has no problem with performances being questioned in a critically constructive manner.

(Continue reading below…)

The Rugby Pod rounds up all last weekend’s Guinness Six Nations and Gallagher Premiership action

Video Spacer

They have to questioned in instances such as Leicester going to Sale last weekend and abjectly losing 36-3. However, he takes issue when the criticism turns to personalised abuse and crosses the line.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Not to diminish the importance that games have for people but like any environment, all players and all coaches are trying to play to the best of their ability,” he told RugbyPass. 

“No team or player ever takes the field trying to have a bad game or wanting to underperform or make a mistake. No coach ever prepares a team poorly because he is preparing a team to be successful at the weekend to the best of his ability. 

“People have the right to be upset and disappointed in performances, of course, but it’s the language and the rhetoric and the behaviours that are used and condoned that have become an acceptable part of everyday practice, whether it is personal accounts or social media or the media – whatever platform it is happening on, it’s unacceptable.

“You wouldn’t say these things to people’s faces. Invariably people often wouldn’t say the comments they put on social media or in the media to someone’s face because there is an outcome, someone is going to be upset, distraught. There might be an angry reaction. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s not to say that people can’t be disappointed. It’s when there are personal attacks on teams and individuals and the language and the rhetoric that is used is divisive, unhelpful and quite frankly shouldn’t be accepted. 

https://twitter.com/RyanKirby2/status/1229482853991358467

“It’s not to say people can’t have a difference of opinion, it’s just doing it in a manner that is kind and reflecting on the fact that everyone is trying to do the best possible to the best of their ability. But we live in a strange time where everything we do in our lives can be put on a public forum.

“There is no place for it [personalised abuse] in any walk of life, let alone in sport. People are going out to do all they can to win and at the end of the day it is a game and there is always another the following week. Nothing is ever that important. The death threats, the toxic language and hate that is spread, it’s not acceptable.”

Reflecting on the inconsistent Leicester that exists now compared to the multi trophy-winning squad he was part of from 1997 through to 2010, Moody is hopeful that the settling of the relegation issue for this season will encourage Tigers to become more expressive in the months ahead and finish with a flourish. 

“It has been a tough five years for Leicester with various different coaches coming and going and certainly for a mate of mine in Geordan Murphy to be any the helm when those times are so tough,” said the Land Rover ambassador.

“For the club and some friends, I’m relieved that Saracens did get relegated because it means it takes the pressure off Leicester to some degree in that the relegation is no longer going to be something for them to worry about. 

“It shows the pressures of the modern game, the challenges that they have had in terms of trying to fit into the salary cap, they have had a much smaller squad size to choose from whereas Sarries were able to have a greater squad size with more world-class players.

“They probably look at some of those last few seasons and say it wasn’t on an even playing field, but hopefully the pressure is off the shoulders of the coaches at Leicester and they can start to relax and play some of the free-flowing rugby that they are capable of playing.

“Look at the backline they have, it’s second to none in terms of talent and the signings they have made and will be making. The real positive for Leicester is actually their academy side who over the last few seasons have performed really well, making it to academy finals. 

“It shows the focus is being put in the right areas, looking at the young talent coming through and growing a new generation. All clubs need to be doing that but it is easy to say and challenging to do.”

WATCH: RugbyPass goes behind the scenes at the Leicester Tigers academy

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 12 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING How the Black Ferns Sevens reacted to Michaela Blyde's code switch Michaela Blyde's NRLW move takes team by surprise
Search