Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Pete Samu not the only one Australian rugby has missed

Digby Ioane’s criticism aimed at Michael Cheika for ‘missing’ on Pete Samu is a little bit unfair to Cheika – one man can’t be responsible for everything – but it does raise a valid point in regards to the identification of talent and selections made by Australian franchises.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pete Samu spent time playing in both the Brisbane and Sydney club competitions and was unable to get a full-time opportunity at the next level. Some portion of this is not the fault of the teams. Australian rugby had only five professional teams at the time and no second-tier competition. Opportunities were scarce. Even now, the second-tier NRC competition can’t compensate every player or even pay every Super Rugby player an additional NRC retainer.

This scarcity of opportunity also adds extra responsibility on those making the contracting decisions – full-time contracts are limited so you better make the right calls. Handing a contract to an average player at the expense of a good one has consequences – namely, severely limiting your team’s chances of winning. With the results of the Australian teams the last three years, those in charge cannot dodge blame.

With only two genuine quality feeder pools in the country (Shute Shield in Sydney and Queensland Premier Rugby in Brisbane), it shouldn’t be that hard for teams to identify talent. Those in charge of the Brumbies, Rebels and previously at the Force, should have their eyes glued to those club competitions. The Reds and Waratahs have even more at stake to get things right.

Interestingly, players who show exceptional ability at club level in Brisbane have shown a similar capability in Super Rugby. Samu Kerevi was unstoppable for GPS in 2014 and has replicated his game-breaking ability for the Reds and Wallabies. Despite defensive concerns, his attacking ability cannot be questioned. Isi Naisarani was a successful back-rower for Souths in 2016, who became Australia’s Super Rugby Player of the Year the very next year at the Force. Brumbies fullback and new Wallaby Tom Banks had a number of years at UQ before being called up to the Reds due to depth issues. The list goes on and on.

Video Spacer

One of the best players seen in Brisbane club rugby this decade was Sam Greene. As a flyhalf, he played a pivotal position that Australian rugby is now struggling with depth. He played three straight seasons of Premier club rugby straight from school.  He was everything Australian teams, for some unknown reason, don’t value – a risk taker and a playmaker. He had speed, skill, vision and one of the best kicking games in the country. He proved by age 21, after over 50 club games he was ready for the next level with all the tools required to succeed as an attacking 10 that Super Rugby requires.

After Quade Cooper left, the Reds continued to stubbornly play the under-20 favourite Jake McIntyre at flyhalf, who led Super Rugby flyhalves in missed tackles and proved over two whole seasons he just wasn’t up to Super Rugby standard. Greene never played more than fifteen minutes in any game, let alone had a chance to start. He left an unproven commodity at Super Rugby level with no opportunities to stay in Australia and has since excelled in the Japanese Top League.

ADVERTISEMENT

There are players playing Super Rugby in Australia right now that didn’t have half the impact Greene had in club rugby. Not even close. Often you would see the highest rated age grade under-20 talent return to grade and fail to impose themselves. Even pros, on the odd occasion, could step down and get outplayed by their opposite. The younger ones could be excused, only proving they need more time to develop physically and mentally.

There is often a ‘red carpet’ pathway in Australian rugby that is rolled out for chosen ones to the detriment of their development. It offers a shortcut to professional rugby through under-20 programmes. These under-20 commitments often mean players bypass a full season or two in club rugby and only ever play a handful of games – effectively wrapped in cotton wool before being thrown in the deep end.

Case in point, the Reds current 20-year-old flyhalf Hamish Stewart has never played a full season of Premier club rugby against men – instead, playing colts grade and under-20 reps before being thrust into Super Rugby in 2017. He might pan out in the long run, but after 10 games this season there isn’t a lot to suggest he is a special talent worthy of picking at 20-years-old – zero try assists, two line breaks, and two line break assists. Wouldn’t he better off in the long-run earning his stripes at club level right now?

Late bloomers that grow an arm and a leg in their early twenties can end up playing more than those in the ‘system’, and some of them become better players. At times they have already been put on the scrap heap too early by decision-makers. Often there might be two or three equally talented players in a position at 17-years-old. If you can only give one an opportunity, that’s life, but don’t completely discount the other two guys.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s great that rugby has pathways for young players, but there is no substitute for time in the saddle to hone skills and develop your game – which club rugby offers. Pete Samu is just the latest example in a long line of players proving that the talent is there in Australian rugby, just sitting below the surface. Often the coaches and selectors either can’t see it, have some form of bias, or personal interests placed in justifying other players.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

O
Oh no, not him again? 2 hours ago
England internationals disagree on final play execution vs All Blacks

Okay, so we blew it big time on Saturday. So rather than repeating what most people have all ready said, what do I want to see from Borthwick going forward?


Let's keep Marcus Smith on the pitch if he's fit and playing well. I was really pleased with his goal kicking. It used to be his weakness. I feel sympathy for George Ford who hadn't kicked all match and then had a kick to win the game. You hear pundits and commentators commend kickers who have come off the bench and pulled that off. Its not easy. If Steve B continues to substitute players with no clear reason then he is going to get criticised.


On paper I thought England would beat NZ if they played to their potential and didn't show NZ too much respect. Okay, the off the ball tackles certainly stopped England scoring tries, but I would have liked to see more smashing over gainlines and less kicking for position. Yes, I also know it's the Springbok endorsed world cup double winning formula but the Kiwi defence isn't the Bok defence, is it. If you have the power to put Smith on the front foot then why muzzle him? I guess what I'm saying is back, yourself. Why give the momentum to a team like NZ? Why feed the beast? Don't give the ball to NZ. Well d'uh.


Our scrum is a long term weakness. If you are going to play Itoje then he needs an ogre next door and a decent front row. Where is our third world class lock? Where are are realible front row bench replacements? The England scrum has been flakey for a while now. It blows hot and cold. Our front five bench is not world class.


On the positive side I love our starting backrow right now. I'd like to see them stick together through to the next world cup.


Anyway, there is always another Saturday.

7 Go to comments
C
CO 2 hours ago
Scott Robertson responds to criticism over All Blacks' handling errors

Robertson is more a manager of coaches than a coach so it comes down to intent of outcomes at a high level. I like his intent, I like the fact his Allblacks are really driving the outcomes however as he's pointed out the high error rates are not test level and their control of the game is driving both wins and losses. England didn't have to play a lot of rugby, they made far fewer mistakes and were extremely unlucky not to win.


In fact the English team were very early in their season and should've been comfortably beaten by an Allblacks team that had played multiple tests together.


Razor has himself recognised that to be the best they'll have to sort out the crisis levels of mistakes that have really increased since the first two tests against England.


Early tackles were a classic example of hyper enthusiasm to not give an inch, that passion that Razor has achieved is going to be formidable once the unforced errors are eliminated.


That's his secret, he's already rebuilt the passion and that's the most important aspect, its inevitable that he'll now eradicate the unforced errors. When that happens a fellow tier one nation is going to get thrashed. I don't think it will be until 2025 though.


The Allblacks will lose both tests against Ireland and France if they play high error rates rugby like they did against England.


To get the unforced errors under control he's going to be needing to handover the number eight role to Sititi and reset expectations of what loose forwards do. Establish a clear distinction with a large, swarthy lineout jumper at six that is a feared runner and dominant tackler and a turnover specialist at seven that is abrasive in contact. He'll then need to build depth behind the three starters and ruthlessly select for that group to be peaking in 2027 in hit Australian conditions on firm, dry grounds.


It's going to help him that Savea is shifting to the worst super rugby franchise where he's going to struggle behind a beaten pack every week.


The under performing loose forward trio is the key driver of the high error rates and unacceptable turn overs due to awol link work. Sititi is looking like he's superman compared to his openside and eight.


At this late stage in the season they shouldn't be operating with just the one outstanding loose forward out of four selected for the English test. That's an abject failure but I think Robertson's sacrificing link quality on purpose to build passion amongst the junior Allblacks as they see the reverential treatment the old warhorses are receiving for their long term hard graft.


It's unfortunately losing test matches and making what should be comfortable wins into nail biters but it's early in the world cup cycle so perhaps it's a sacrifice worth making.


However if this was F1 then Sam Cane would be Riccardo and Ardie would be heading into Perez territory so the loose forwards desperately need revitalisation through a rebuild over the next season to complement the formidable tight five.

28 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING All Blacks XV player ratings vs Munster | Autumn Nations Series All Blacks XV player ratings vs Munster
Search