Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Peter Bills: Premiership Talks A Big Game, Now Players Need To Deliver

Harlequins vs Wasps

The Aviva Premiership is claiming record viewing numbers this season, writes new Rugby Pass columnist Peter Bills, but the skills on display are all too often lacking compared to Southern Hemisphere competitions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Now I know that all organisations, whether they be governments, rugby federations or tiddly winks societies, love to put a gloss on their activities.

These days, budget speeches by the financial controllers of most governments, take about a week to dissect. It’s only then you get to the small print and find out what is the actual truth.

Thus forewarned and forearmed, we should perhaps treat with care the viewing figures released proclaiming record TV audiences for the first weekend of England’s Aviva Premiership matches. ‘More than 1 million people watched the opening round of games’ the PR blurb gushed.

The opening Friday night match of the weekend programme, Gloucester v Leicester, attracted a rather humble 257,000 viewers on BT Sport. But then, the satellite channel is small fry compared to the likes of terrestrial television. UEFA, Europe’s soccer organisation, handed all its Champions League soccer rights to BT Sport for a king’s ransom and within 12 months was admitting it had made a mistake. The viewing figures were greatly disappointing.

If English club rugby were on the BBC it would attract way bigger audiences.

Never mind. The Commercial Director proclaimed with obvious excitement “These figures represent a fantastic start to the new season and shows (sic) the huge appeal of Aviva Premiership rugby worldwide.” Every single game, he went on, would be live on TV somewhere in the world. Indeed, the opening match was broadcast live on NBC in America for the first time.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1473723660″]

Quite what the Yanks would have made of a frenetic sort of version of the Eton wall game played under uncertain floodlights at Gloucester rugby ground on a Friday night, is unknown. All I can report was the reaction to one English Premier League soccer match between Chelsea and a top opponent, I saw in a New York bar some years ago.

ADVERTISEMENT

One of the locals, fumbling for a cigarette as he headed out of the place at full-time, shrugged and said to no-one in particular ‘So the Chelsea lose 4-1. Who gives a shit?’

Yes Sir!

As ever, behind the excited headlines, some relevant facts lurk. Club rugby in England is a game generally played at half pace compared to a tournament like Super Rugby. The vision of players frequently appears impaired, wrong options are taken with maddening consistency. Poor execution of basic skills is a given.

Any team’s progress into an opponent’s 22 is a signal for a mass pile-up of bodies either hurtling towards the white chalk of the goal line or trying to repel the invaders. It’s about as subtle as a sledgehammer cracking Christmas nuts. Far too often, it resembles dinosaur rugby.

But then, throughout the world in most of the rugby playing nations, there has been a general levelling down, not up, of standards. There is scarcely a scintilla of difference in the playing standards of countries like Wales, France, South Africa, Australia, Argentina, Ireland, Scotland, Japan, Samoa and Fiji. In most cases, any winner could emerge on a given day.

ADVERTISEMENT

Right now, England are probably the best of the rest. But even their own coach, Australian Eddie Jones, concedes that the more he has watched the tapes of their 3-0 Test series win over the Wallabies in Australia in June, the more critical and less satisfied he has become.

For Jones knows one truth. New Zealand are comfortably clear of all rivals in the rugby world at this time. That’s not to say they’re unbeatable. But it is going to take a lot more skill than players chucking lobbed passes behind the ears of their mates and gleefully dying with the ball in broken play to upset the All Blacks.

If that is indeed the standard fare of Aviva Premiership rugby, and all too often sadly it is, then perhaps the tournament organisers and commercial officers might do better re-focusing their attention on the few moments of pure skill.

At least that way, the potential “huge appeal” of Aviva Premiership rugby could be explained to viewers.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 9 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

35 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What is the future of rugby in 2025? What is the future of rugby in 2025?
Search