Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Peter Umaga-Jensen set for All Blacks debut after Rieko Ioane withdraws through injury

(Photo by Masanori Udagawa/Getty Images)

Rieko Ioane has withdrawn from the All Black’s squad for the second Bledisloe Cup test against the Wallabies at Eden park, and has been replaced by Hurricanes centre Peter Umaga-Jensen.

ADVERTISEMENT

After starting last weeks test at outside centre, Ioane was dropped to the bench as midfield cover after a mixed performance in the first test of the year, which was largely overshadowed by the 23-year-old butchering what appeared to be a certain try.

Ioane has been battling a hamstring injury since the clash, but was given until the 11th hour to prove his fitness for the highly anticipated match. However, the 2017 World Rugby Breakthrough Player of the Year failed a fitness test on Sunday morning.

Video Spacer

Healthspan Elite Performance of the Week | Bledisloe Cup | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Video Spacer

Healthspan Elite Performance of the Week | Bledisloe Cup | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

 

Umaga-Jensen was a standout for the Hurricanes in Super Rugby Aotearoa, in what was a breakout season for the up-and-comer. The 22-year-old earned selection in the North vs South match on the back of his five SR Aotearoa matches, and was called into the All Blacks camp for the first time earlier this month as injury cover.

He flew up to Auckland yesterday with a potential test debut waiting for him, after having initially been released to play for his province Wellington in the Mitre 10 Cup.

There will be plenty of watchful eyes on the up-and-comer, who is the nephew of former All Blacks captain Tana Umaga.

ADVERTISEMENT

Umaga-Jensen’s selection is one of two changes to the New Zealand midfield, with All Blacks mainstay Anton Lienert-Brown having been promoted to the starting side after coming on as a replacement last week.

Auckland’s Eden Park will host the next Bledisloe Cup test, which is the second of four matches between the All Blacks and the Wallabies this year. It’s a must-win clash for the hosts, who will play two tests in Australia afterwards to determine Trans-Tasman rugby supremacy.

The two sides played out an entertaining, nearly 90 minutes of rugby at Wellington’s Sky Stadium last Sunday, which finished 16-all.

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Jake White: Ireland, Australia and Wales all have the same problem Jake White: Ireland, Australia and Wales have the same problem
Search