Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

PGB statement: Requirements for promotion to the Premiership

(Photo by George Wood/Getty Images)

The professional game board at the RFU have agreed to loosen the rules governing the minimum stadium capacity rule which prevented Ealing from taking up their promotion to the Gallagher Premiership as winners of the 2021/22 Championship in England. 

ADVERTISEMENT

It was last April when the RFU confirmed that the Trailfinders wouldn’t be coming up for the 2022/23 season and not having a team promoted from the second tier scuppered the plan to have a 14-club Premiership this term.

The PGB have now revisited the situation but rather than completely reduce the desired 10,001 stadium capacity, they will instead allow second-tier teams a 5,000 capacity entry point to the Premiership and allow additional time for them to get their ground capacities up to that five-figure capacity for the 2024/25 season if they want to stay in the top flight.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

A statement read: “The professional game board met today [Friday] to agree on the minimum standards criteria for the 2022/23 season, which includes requirements for promotion to the Premiership from the Championship. 

“Around the principal area of discussion, minimum capacity of grounds, it has been agreed that there will be additional time for a club to build up to a capacity of 10,001:

  • At the time of the audit in January 2023, a club must have a capacity of at least 5,000 plus planning permission to develop the ground up to a capacity of 10,001, with funding in place to achieve this. It would have to demonstrate an agreement with a contractor to carry out the work in due course;
  • At the start of the season, 2023/24, the club must have a capacity of at least 5,000, if the ground is not a designated ground under the Safety of Sports Grounds Act 1975, it must have in place a non-statutory safety certificate from its local authority, and confirmation from its local authority as to its assurance and enforcement process;
  • For the start of the 2024/25 season, the club must have a capacity of 10,001 and a full statutory general certificate. If these are not in place it will result in relegation.” 

PGB chairman Phil de Glanville said: “It remains the view of the PGB that a minimum ground capacity of 10,001 is important due to the rigour of the local authority-issued safety certificate for stadia of this size in addition to its importance for fans, sponsors and broadcasters.

“We recognise the challenges of achieving promotion and sustaining the club once in the Premiership and want to support Championship clubs with a transition season to allow Championship clubs more time to achieve the 10,001 capacity criteria once in the Premiership.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
'Razor's conservatism is in danger of halting New Zealand's progress'

Haha yeah I know, sorry I just cbf doing anything other than sprouting the garbage that comes in. You either follow the train of thought or don't most the time, that's why I like you, happy to not take it serious like, and reply regardless.

Haha more imaginary rational. You mean in 2018 and 19 he used 36 new players?

more = you're following in Saders footsteps (here I go again assuming you know what I'll mean haha)

imaginary = fictitious world cups (no WC in 2018)

by "months before" you mean 2018/19? = because you wrote 2018 i'm assuming that's because your brain was thinking about that year when he used most of those 36 players

36 new players = because it's absolutely impossible to use 36 new players in the handful of games you get, or "months", before a WC

Doesn't really sound like good coaching and reinforces other theories. Wouldn't spread that.

Doesn't really sound like good coaching = that is waay to many players no matter what way you spin it, or what period. Where did you even get the data for that from?

reinforces other theories = no need to go into them here but it definitely suggests a case of being lucky to win despite the fact (if true) imo

Wouldn't spread that = cheekyness about above point


So yeah, you can see why I don't try to elaberate my posts so everyone can understand and sadly theyre too succinct for some with a slightly different lingo or thought.

and two years of >85% win ratio on the trot - I’d love to see how he’d have down with better coaching.

the none TLDR version reply..

two years = but weren't you following the similar line of this article that Razor needs to open it up? Why would you think that when you're suggesting he's got another 3 or 4 years before he reaches that point in tenure when he should also be trying to hit the 85 mark?

>85% win ratio on the trot = WC years are short and provide easy opposition, you don't normally include them. 22 would be more relevant, and this year you had both other top teams at home, so you'd think that 85 number is overs, or 'above' average based on circumstances (85 is a really fabulous number however so going back to 80 would also still be great)

love to see how he’d have done with better coaching. = well it's exactly the opposite of above isn't it, it's operating at well over 70 for 4 (excl covid) of those 7 years instead of his 60%, before hitting the 80s mark.


You might also ask well how could that be possible when he's done so bloody well just to do what he's done? Well I'm not going to take him (or SA) down a beg or two, instead I'll give you the hint (because I'm over thinking how to type long versions of replys), the answer is in this article!


Can you think of any specific players that became instrumental to the team from those 36 new players? One's plucked out of nowhere so to speak? I know for the first two years after covid he switched up you're team and tactics after each game against NZ (for the second), I think winning both 1st games and losing both rematch's? You don't think he should ever have done that differently, not been so happy to give up a victory against the ABs?

262 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Watch: All Black Jordie Barrett scores another for new club Leinster Watch: All Black Jordie Barrett scores another for new club Leinster
Search