Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Phil Dowson refuses to blame referee for Northampton’s loss

By PA
David Ribbans on the charge - PA

Northampton boss Phil Dowson insisted it was Saints’ dismal first half and not a dubious refereeing decision that underpinned their 38-15 defeat in Saturday’s Gallagher Premiership semi-final.

ADVERTISEMENT

Saracens were outstanding as they ran in five tries to set up a Twickenham appointment with either Leicester or Sale in a fortnight’s time.

But wing Sean Maitland was lucky to stay on the pitch after clattering into George Furbank as the rivals contested a kick 25 seconds into the game.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

Maitland appeared to strike Furbank’s head with his elbows but referee Karl Dickson issued only a penalty and to rub salt into the wound the Scotland’s international scored Saracens’ first two tries.

“The referee didn’t give it. I presume the TMO looked at it and made a decision that it was a rugby contest and therefore play on,” Dowson said.

“We’ll have to look at it again. I don’t know where Maitland was looking. I don’t know where he was in conjunction with the ball in the air. Whether I agree with it or not is irrelevant.

“You need to be lucky here and whether that’s an element of the luck or not I don’t know.

“A couple of things didn’t go our way but I’m sure Sarries would say the same thing. That was one of those decisions that didn’t go our way, rightly or wrongly.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Everyone will have an opinion on it. But it was still 15 a side and we conceded three tries in the first half.

“In a semi-final against the best team in the league, you’re going to struggle, no matter what decision is made by the referee.”

Saracens director of rugby Mark McCall felt Dickson had made the correct call.

When asked if Maitland was fortunate to stay on the pitch, McCall replied: “No. I thought it was a good decision.

“Sean probably didn’t need to do what he did, which is to pull out because he’s going to compete for the ball. I thought it was a good decision.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Northampton staged a fightback in the third quarter but Saracens showed resolve before hitting back with a late penalty try and Max Malins touchdown.

“I thought it was our strongest defensive performance for years. It’s always been the DNA of the club and that’s as good as we’ve been for a while to be honest,” McCall said.

“That laid the foundation for the victory and the performance. We were physical and got control of a very good attacking team. The players felt in control.

“You’re not going to have a semi-final your own way all the time. I was very pleased with how we dealt with it. We were emotionally consistent and strong.

“We got on with the next thing, put energy into the next thing. We did our jobs and got back to basics. These things happen in finals and semi-finals and we dealt with it really well.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Argentina v France | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Men's Match Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Women's Match Highlights

Tokyo Sungoliath vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Reds vs Force | Super Rugby W 2025 | Full Match Replay

Behind the Scenes with the Australian Rugby Sevens Team in Hong Kong | HSBC SVNS Embedded | Episode 9

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

New Zealand in Hong Kong | Brady Rush | Sevens Wonders | Episode 4

The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

L
LuigiCavelier 25 minutes ago
Why the ‘State of Origin’ will have a big say in Schmidt’s Wallabies selection

Being an artist in New York, I rely heavily on online platforms to showcase and sell my work. One day, I was approached by a gallery claiming to offer international exposure for my art. They promised to feature my pieces in exhibitions and connect me with global buyers. Excited by the opportunity, I agreed to their terms, which included an upfront payment of $3000 to cover administrative fees. The gallery’s contact person stopped responding to my emails, and when I tried to visit their address, it turned out to be fake. I realized I had fallen victim to a scam. Feeling betrayed and frustrated, I didn’t know where to turn. That’s when I discovered Muyern Trust Hacker on ( Te le gram at muyerntrusthackertech )  I reached out to them, providing all the details I had: the gallery’s information, transaction records, and emails from the scammer. They worked tirelessly with international authorities to track the funds and initiate the recovery process. Within a few weeks, they successfully returned the $3000 to me. The relief I felt was overwhelming. Not only did I get my money back, but I also learned valuable lessons about verifying opportunities and being cautious with upfront payments. They are true professionals who go above and beyond to help their clients. Thanks to them, I can now focus on creating and sharing my art without the burden of losing hard-earned money to scammers. Here is their mail for efficient resolution: (muyerntrusted(@) ma il - me(.) c o m )

78 Go to comments
L
LuigiCavelier 40 minutes ago
Mick Cleary: 'England are back among the heavyweights.'

Being an artist in New York, I rely heavily on online platforms to showcase and sell my work. One day, I was approached by a gallery claiming to offer international exposure for my art. They promised to feature my pieces in exhibitions and connect me with global buyers. Excited by the opportunity, I agreed to their terms, which included an upfront payment of $3000 to cover administrative fees. The gallery’s contact person stopped responding to my emails, and when I tried to visit their address, it turned out to be fake. I realized I had fallen victim to a scam. Feeling betrayed and frustrated, I didn’t know where to turn. That’s when I discovered Muyern Trust Hacker on ( Te le gram at muyerntrusthackertech )  I reached out to them, providing all the details I had: the gallery’s information, transaction records, and emails from the scammer. They worked tirelessly with international authorities to track the funds and initiate the recovery process. Within a few weeks, they successfully returned the $3000 to me. The relief I felt was overwhelming. Not only did I get my money back, but I also learned valuable lessons about verifying opportunities and being cautious with upfront payments. They are true professionals who go above and beyond to help their clients. Thanks to them, I can now focus on creating and sharing my art without the burden of losing hard-earned money to scammers. Here is their mail for efficient resolution: (muyerntrusted(@) ma il - me(.) c o m )

20 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ How does a World Rugby consultant help emerging nations? How does a World Rugby consultant help emerging nations?
Search