Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Piers Morgan weighs in on Cipriani debate

Cipriani during the England training session held at Pennyhill Park

After being named both the Premiership Player of the Season and the RPA Players’ Player of the Season, there is a lot of talk surrounding Danny Cipriani and his return to the England fold.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cipriani has been excluded from the England squad all season, despite his demonstrable good form. What makes this more bizarre is that he played for England in 2018 in the summer series against South Africa, where many thought he proved himself worthy of keeping hold of the number 10 shirt after guiding England to victory in the third test.

This is something that has been discussed by players, fans and pundits alike, and now broadcaster and columnist Piers Morgan has thrown his hat into the ring. He has never been afraid to share his opinion on any topic, but this is one where many England fans will agree with him.

Morgan said on Twitter that “mavericks win matches & tournaments”, and told Eddie Jones to stop being “stubborn”.

An off-field incident happened between the summer series and the new season, which did not cover the fly-half in glory, but Jones has been reluctant to say that is why he has not been picked. He has preferred to say that it is an issue of performances and form.

Morgan is just one of many that are demanding Jones pick Cipriani for the World Cup, as his form is no longer an excuse that the Australian can fall back on. However, many feel that this will fall on deaf ears, as it has all year.

The Good Morning Britain presenter has long been an advocate for some of English sport’s pariahs. He used to campaign for a similarly divisive figure Kevin Pietersen to return to the England Cricket set up, as he was another player whose talents could not be disputed but may have created a personality clash.

ADVERTISEMENT

With Jones set to name the England squad to face the Barbarians next weekend, many feel that this is now or never for Cipriani. He would obviously not have another chance to prove himself to earn a place in the squad for the World Cup warm-up matches, and that would be the end of his dream of representing England again, certainly under Jones.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Kubota Spears vs Saitama Wild Knights | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

The gruelling reality behind one of the fastest sports in the world | The Report

Boks Office | Episode 40 | The Steven Kitshoff Special

Perry Baker in the house | HSBC Life on Tour | Los Angeles

O2 Inside Line: All In | Episode 6 | Le Crunch

The Unexpected Journey to USA 7s Glory | Aaron Cummings | Sevens Wonders

USA vs Japan | Full Match Replay

Yokohama Canon Eagles vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Confidence knocks and finding your people | Flo Williams | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Tackling reasons for drop-out in sport | Zainab Alema | Rugby Rising Locker Room

Jet Lag: The biggest challenge facing international sports? | The Report

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
BigGabe 1 hour ago
'Love him or hate him, Henry Pollock has got the rugby world talking.'

Well, I would disagree with your take that you don’t take the p*** out of the opposition.


Sledging and posturing is very much a part of the game - “four more years”/"just a **** richie mccaw”/any swan dive celebration/English yelling when they win minor penalties/etc etc. Cricket has much the same when a wicket keeper chats in a batsman’s ears, but no one complains about it. Just because we can’t hear what goes on a ruck or maul, or see what goes on, doesn’t mean it doesn’t go on. Sport is emotional. Let’s not pretend that rugby has a history of behaving like absolute gentleman before the final whistle goes off.


The spirit of rugby…now this is an interesting one. What does that mean? 2-3 years ago, the 6-2/7-1 split was against the spirit of rugby, but now it is used by club and country. Does this mean the spirit of rugby can change? In 1974, the Lions had an infamous Call 99. Today, teams are still getting into fights. Other sports don’t do this. Is this the spirit of rugby? I think this phrase is one of those useful ones that means everything and nothing and can be used by both sides of the fence, as well as the fence itself, to justify what they want to see. But perhaps we should not be looking at Pollock, but at ourselves. Are we (you) all not giving a self-described wind up merchant exactly what he wants? I think this conservative group of sports fans needs to realise that just bc they have viewed rugby a certain way for a long time, does not mean that it necessarily needs to be viewed that way for ever and ever amen. That’s gatekeeping and the generations to come don’t like or respect it. As rugby culture breaks into new markets, it needs to constantly adjust.

9 Go to comments
N
Nickers 2 hours ago
USA team in Super Rugby Pacific is not the answer right now, but this is

The question for any expansion is - what is the point?


On one hand talking about expanding for commercial reasons, but then saying younger squad members would play giving big names a rest making it more for development purposes?


The problem with SRP is it serves two masters - fans who want a good competition to watch, but also the national teams in developing players so they can go on to become international players.


The case for maximising young player development:


A major problem NZ and Australia have is at U20s. AR and NZR would be best served by investing in proper U20 super rugby competition that runs in conjunction with Super Rugby, rather than the one-off carnival style thing that happens at the moment. 20 year olds coming out of France and England in particular, but also France are noticeably more developed than the equivalent players from NZ, Australia and even SA.


NZ and Australia probably both have one too many teams in SR. If you’re taking a long term view they are best served by cutting teams from the comp now and improving the quality even more. Although MP have been good this year there is also an argument for cutting them too, and reducing to 8 teams that all play each other home and away in a round robin. It would be a ridiculously strong competition with a lot of depth if all the best players are redistributed.


This in conjunction with a full U20s competition (possibly playing just one round rather than 2) would make NZ and Australia international teams much stronger with a lot more depth.


But that solution would make less money and cost more.


NPC would need to be fully amateur or semi-pro at best in this model. If you cross reference the losses NZR posted today with the costs they have previously published about operating the NPC, you can attribute a huge amount, if not all of the losses, to the NPC. At the moment this is putting way too much money into a failing high performance competition at the expense of development.

12 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ What can we expect from Farrell's Lions squad? The key questions answered What can we expect from Farrell's Lions squad? The key questions answered
Search