Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Players need a break': Mark Robinson on the future of the All Blacks' rest policy

(Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

Criticism of the All Blacks‘ resting policy has again flooded in following the Hurricanes’ team announcement for their clash with the Chiefs. Ardie Savea, Jordie Barrett and Tyrel Lomax will all miss the heavyweight matchup in order to ensure their availability for the Hurricanes’ playoff run.

ADVERTISEMENT

The absence of three of the Hurricanes’ top players has not been well-received by Super Rugby fans who were anticipating another epic match between the two rivals and wanted to see all the stars in action.

It’s not the first instance of the rest requirements coming into play in big matches, but Hurricanes head coach Jason Holland said criticism of his decision was “a kick in the teeth” for the players who step up into the starting lineup in the All Blacks players’ absence.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

New Zealand Rugby CEO Mark Robinson offered insight into the research behind the policy – which requires All Blacks to rest at least every fifth week of Super Rugby Pacific – and shared how the policy might evolve in the future.

“It’s a great question and it’s a fair one,” Robinson said on SENZ.

“We have an obligation where we are juggling priorities and all the research and data we see from our high-performance people around load management and amount of minutes suggests that the players need a break around the five to six game mark.

“I appreciate that there are fans out there who are used to seeing players play for long periods of time. However, we feel an obligation around player welfare and all the information is telling us they need a break.

“(Concussion) is also a massive priority for us. We are looking at ways we can change the format of the game (so that) over time, the nature of (head) contact will change.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

A major change in the game at the community level has been encouraged by World Rugby following extensive analysis and consultation that would see the legal tackle height lowered to the sternum. At this stage, the initiative is an opt-in trial in the community game globally, but depending on results and feedback, changes could be implemented at the professional level.

New Zealand Rugby will keep player safety a top priority and doesn’t see its policy as posing significant enough of a threat to audience engagement to provoke a revision. Robinson highlighted some of the recent achievements of Super Rugby Pacific’s crowd numbers as a testament while also acknowledging how he and his board are working to evolve with the changing landscape of sport in New Zealand.

“We have seen two sell-outs in recent weeks,” Robinson said, referring to round 12’s Crusaders vs Blues match and round 10’s Crusaders vs Chiefs.

“Historically, the sport has relied on rugby being the national game and the (thinking has been) that you should come out and support us.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We acknowledge that we need to change that model.

“We are working really hard to put the fan in the centre of the game.

“We have worked hard to grow value across the game so we can re-invest and foster the game at all levels.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
i
isaac 582 days ago

Kiwis and aussie based players play the least rugby..take the for kiwis for eg. 5 weeks of srp and maybe some playing another 3 weeks than just test matches....RC and northern tour....NH players, France for eg play club rugby for more than 30weeks than 6N and summer tour to SH and then host SH teams during northern tour...who needs rest???what they should do is have a tri nations between Fiji, Aus and Kiwis within SRP season...

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search