Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Players to be offered 'conditional contracts' in Wales

(Photo by Joe Giddens/PA Images via Getty Images)

Amid fears of a player exodus in Wales, the Professional Rugby Board has confirmed that negotiations will begin in the new year on a ‘conditional basis’ following a meeting with the Welsh Rugby Players Association.

ADVERTISEMENT

With contract negotiations frozen in the Welsh regions at the moment due to funding issues, the Dragons have already seen Wales lock Will Rowlands confirm his departure at the end of the season, and the worry is that many more will follow suit.

But the PRB revealed in a statement today that following the verbal agreement over funding that has been made, conditional contracts will be offered to players in the intervening time before the agreement is formalised and is signed by all parties.

Video Spacer
Video Spacer

This verbal agreement involves a “six-year-framework which details significantly enhanced WRU funding expectations from distributable monies, club commercial performance, URC media rights, new debt and shareholder investment.”

The PRB also expressed their regret over the “concern” caused amongst “player, their agents, and supporters” during this ordeal.

The statement reads: “The PRB understands delays in reaching verbal agreement and the time required to process legal documentation have prevented the Regions from contracting some players for future seasons.

“The concern caused amongst players, their agents, and supporters is hugely regrettable, but it is important that this is done correctly.

ADVERTISEMENT

“This is why we aim to offer conditional contracts, giving players details of their individual offer. Further updates on this initiative will be provided to the WRPA next week.

“There is still much to do, but the PRB will continue to work together with the WRPA for the benefit of all parties.”

These look to be promising signs for Welsh rugby both on and off the pitch going into the new year. Obviously the major change going into 2023 is the return of Warren Gatland at the helm of the national team, but there seems to be progress off the pitch as well.

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

R
RedWarriors 4 hours ago
Antoine Dupont undergoes surgery on injured knee ahead of long absence

Rugby incident, happens scores of times in a game. Dupont wasn’t even hit with much force, Beirne just clears him and force is added from behind from Furlong.

We can’t have special treatment for France just because their star is the one who gets unlucky.

There is already a lack of clarity around actual Written decisions and how they differ from bans.

For example, Mauvaka the official written decision states Mauvaka to have made a ‘reckless’, ‘deliberate’, shot ‘to the head’ of a ‘player in a vulnerable position’ on the ground. That’s a high level entry ban of 10 weeks. However, the press release did not show ‘reckless’ or ‘vulnerable player’ ticked alloweing Mauvaka to enter at the 6 match mid range.

Similarly Ntamack’s written report showed that it was a ‘reckless’, ‘head shot’ with ‘injury’. The injury was a fully displaced nose bone and Ntamack apologizes for the injury in the written report. This should give Ntamack an entry level of 6 weeks but in the Press Release ‘Injured’ is unticked meaning Ntamack gets away with a 4 week entry ban. This is not counting the fact that the world knows he deliberately injured Thomas.

No. France have been abusing the system for years, recently spreading disinformation about the Ringrose ban in order to undermine confidence in the process.

Giving France even more special treatment is not the answer.

7 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Vermeulen to join Premiership rivals despite interest around the world Vermeulen to join Premiership rivals despite interest around the world
Search