Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Playtime is over. Only a resounding win will do for Springboks

South Africa's wing Makazole Mapimpi (R) celebrates after he scores a try during the Autumn International friendly rugby union match between Scotland and South Africa at Murrayfield Stadium in Edinburgh on November 13, 2021. (Photo by ANDY BUCHANAN / AFP) (Photo by ANDY BUCHANAN/AFP via Getty Images)

Right then, playtime is over. The experimental gadgets have been stowed away and the more pragmatic blunt instruments have been brought back. There are no excuses. No one is making any. The Springboks mean business and nothing but a resounding and comprehensive display will do.

ADVERTISEMENT

When Wales first touched down in South Africa, many rugby observers – present company included – predicted a one-sided three-nil wash. This was not born out of arrogance or disrespect. In their most recent assignment, Wales coughed up a lead and lost to Italy on their own patch for the first time in their history. The regions were in disarray. The youth teams were a shambles. And coach Wayne Pivac appeared bereft of game-changing ideas.

Conversely, the Springboks juggernaut was in full flow. Fuelled by their social responsibility, their aggrandising mythology, and a forward pack that must surely consume enough red meat to leave a noticeable carbon footprint on their own, the South Africans marched into this rubber with well-deserved confidence.

Video Spacer

Stephen Ferris, have New Zealand rugby lost their aura? | RugbyPass Offload | EP 42

Video Spacer

Stephen Ferris, have New Zealand rugby lost their aura? | RugbyPass Offload | EP 42

They’d beaten the British and Irish Lions despite being hamstrung by Covid-19 parameters. Two of their franchises charged towards the United Rugby Championship final. And with the addition of overseas based players, they boasted enough depth to field two Test quality outfits.

The first game was a lot tighter than anyone but the most ardent Wales fan could have predicted. But the Springboks won and winning, as coach Jacques Nienaber has said, is the only currency this team deals in.

Wales claimed the second match. But that was against a depleted team that, let’s be honest, was not the strongest match-day squad available. Yes they were wearing the Springbok badge, and yes Wales lifted their game and fully deserved their inaugural Test victory on South African soil, but we’re dealing in half-truths if we choose to look back on that contest without acknowledging the glaring caveat.

There will be nothing of the sort in Cape Town. This is a seminal moment in Nienaber’s tenure as coach. Pundits, journalists and fans still believe that Rassie Erasmus is pulling the strings. That may well be true and on the evidence of the Two Sides documentary that chronicled the Lions series, there is enough weight behind this theory.

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

Nienaber is not fighting for his job. He is a well-liked and astute coach and has the backing of the team. Besides, he’s not going to get the sack with just over a year until he embarks on a World Cup title defence.

Instead, Nienaber and his Springboks are out to reassert an aura that last week’s reverse has somewhat diminished. Forget the rankings – South Africa are now third behind France and Ireland – this is less tangible than World Rugby’s metrics. Only one outcome will rekindle the faith of their devoted supporters.

There are, however, three possible outcomes. The first is almost unthinkable as far as Springboks loyalists are concerned: Wales might win. Of course they might. They were mightily impressive last week. Gareth Anscombe’s fairytale stole the show but every man in red dug deep and pulled out a performance that will echo through Welsh rugby history. Momentum is a mysterious variable in elite sport and series are often decided by the direction of the wind.

That would be catastrophic for South Africa but the next possible outcome would hardly constitute a roaring success. The Springboks may scrape a win, just as they did in Pretoria. Nienaber and his coaches have stressed that an ugly win still counts but we shouldn’t buy that and Springboks fans shouldn’t accept it either.

ADVERTISEMENT

Players and coaches have spoken of “going to the gutter” but that rhetoric is starting to stink. It might chime in a Lions series or in crucial World Cup knockout matches, but this is a bilateral tour against the eighth-best team in the world. South Africans should hold the team to a higher standard than gutter scraps and bar-room brawls.

That is not to say that they need to start throwing the ball around and play Barbarians rugby. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and well-worked set-pieces and dominant first-phase play can still take the breath away.

Only a ruthless win, both on the scoreboard and throughout the run of play, will suffice. That is no slight on a Wales squad that includes three players with over 100 Test caps. Their man at No 8 has a claim to being the best in his position over the last 10 years. Their line-out is well drilled and they have pace to burn out wide. But Wales are not going to win next year’s World Cup. South Africa might. Champion teams are supposed to bury those below them. A statement victory is required.

Related

Nienaber’s selection is a declaration of intent. Some might quibble over Jaden Hendrikse starting ahead of Faf de Klerk at scrumhalf, but this is based on form rather than reputation. Willie le Roux similarly divides opinion but anyone worth listening to in South African rugby will emphasise his influence across the park. Go and watch all of South Africa’s tries in the last five or six years that were not scored from a rolling maul. There’s a good chance le Roux had a hand in most of them.

The six-two split is also a sign that Nienaber is eager to return to a tried and tested formula. A world class front row on the bench is bolstered by three adaptable forwards while the all-round abilities of Damien Willemse and le Roux means that every backline position is covered.

Expect box kicks and big mauls with every cog fitting into the cohesive machine. It won’t be pretty. It doesn’t have to be. What it needs to be is punishing, assertive and dominant. Nothing else will do.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
G
Gray 892 days ago

Go Bokke !!!

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
J
JW 8 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search