Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Pocock and Pulu missing for Brumbies in round two

David Pocock. Photo by Zak Kaczmarek/Getty Images

Brumbies head coach Dan McKellar has made three changes to the team that was narrowly beaten by the Rebels in their Super Rugby opener last weekend with Tom Cusack, Andy Muirhead and Chance Peni promoted to the starting XV.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cusack and Peni are included at the expense of David Pocock and Toni Pulu, both of whom suffered injuries during the first-half of the Rebels match, that ruled them out of selection, whilst Muirhead starts ahead of Henry Speight, who hobbled off in the second half.

Other than that, McKellar has shown his trust in the team that pushed the Rebels to the limit and, given better execution of the myriad opportunities they created, especially in the opening stanza, will be confident that they can gain a first win of the season.

James Slipper, who enjoyed an excellent debut in Brumbies colours last week, continues in a front row that provided two of the team’s try-scorers in Round 1, both Folau Fainga’a and Allan Alaalatoa finding their way across the whitewash.

Indeed, all four of the Brumbies tries were claimed by the pack with the lock forward pairing of Rory Arnold and Sam Carter, who continue against the Chiefs, giving the tight five a monopoly of the five-pointers.

Cusack slots into Openside flanker role with Rob Valetini and Lachlan McCaffrey completing a strong, mobile and dynamic back-row trio that are sure to be at the heart of any Brumbies success.

Joe Powell and Christian Lealiifano continue at half-back, directing the side around the park, Lealiifano passing 850 career Super Rugby points against the Rebels, with Irae Simone and Tevita Kuridrani tasked with finding any holes in the Chiefs midfield.

ADVERTISEMENT

Muirhead, Peni and Tom Banks round out the starting XV with all three possessing excellent pace and finishing ability.

The finishers are the same as was selected for the Rebels match except for exciting young talent Tom Wright who is drafted into the squad for a potential debut, as Muirhead starts. This means that Josh Mann-Rea will become the equal oldest Australian to play Super Rugby when he comes on.

BRUMBIES

  1. James Slipper
  2. Folau Fainga’a
  3. Allan Alaalatoa
  4. Rory Arnold
  5. Sam Carter
  6. Rob Valetini
  7. Tom Cusack
  8. Lachlan McCaffrey
  9. Joe Powell
  10. Christian Lealiifano (c)
  11. Andy Muirhead
  12. Irae Simone
  13. Tevita Kuridrani
  14. Chance Peni
  15. Tom Banks

    Reserves

  1. Josh Mann-Rea
  2. Scott Sio
  3. Leslie Leuluaialii-Makin
  4. Blake Enever
  5. Peter Samu
  6. Matt Lucas
  7. Wharenui Hawera
  8. Tom Wright

Rugby World Cup City Guides – Kumamoto:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

146 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search