Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

'Political selection': Eddie Jones makes sensational Marcus Smith claim

(Photo by Alex Davidson/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

Former England head coach Eddie Jones has tabled a startling theory on why new coach Steve Borthwick flip-flopped between flyhalves Marcus Smith and Owen Farrell during the Six Nations.

ADVERTISEMENT

Smith opened the tournament in the 29-23 opening loss against Scotland but Borthwick quickly turned to the experience of Farrell for wins over Italy and Wales, relegating his younger 10 to the bench.

The Harlequins flyhalf barely featured in both wins coming onto the field with less than sixty seconds left in Cardiff with the 20-10 win already sealed.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

But the 24-year-old was then re-inserted into the starting XV after starring for his club in the bye week. But after a record loss to France, he was then dropped for the second time for the final round against Ireland.

Jones tabled his theory on his Eddie podcast that Borthwick may have received undue interference from the RFU board that forced him to recall Smith into the starting side.

“The selection of Marcus, to me that’s always the political selection,” the new Wallabies head coach explained.

“A player has been out of form, hasn’t quite done well at Test level and then he plays one or two club games and he’s a hero.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The media starts banging on the door – ‘you’ve got to pick him’ – and then the board reacts to that, and asks: ‘Why aren’t you picking him?’

“When you’re a young coach at the start of your career you can get influenced by that.”

The 63-year-old expressed his empathy for Smith who was one of England’s best in the 53-10 defeat but paid the price for the loss with his starting role.

Jones believed that the UK media’s influence is so strong that it creates disharmony within the RFU with executive and board leadership moving into operational matters.

“I really felt for Marcus in that game,” Jones said.

“The thing you’ve got in England is the intenseness of the media, which then affects the board, and they start to step in, and that’s when you get problems. Allow the coach to coach.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The board have a strategic role, but because they feel the pressure they try to get involved in the operational side, and that’s when things get worse.

“Unless you have strong people around the team that can be a difficulty.”

The RFU have denied Jones’ claims that Borthwick’s selections were taken out of his hands in a statement released to The Telegraph.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
l
lot 640 days ago

The seniles in RFU interferes.. and poor Rookie BW succumbed . that's why EJ was sacked because EJ stood his ground on his choice of players

i
isaac 640 days ago

Wow...if there was no truth in that claim by Eddie...I cant believe the RFU actually defended their stand in press statement to a 'nobody'.....but its Eddie....

C
Cameron 640 days ago

What he says makes a lot of sense though. Why would you drop a guy like Smith and then pick him to start off the back of one club game? It doens't make sense and the argument that 'oh well, Farrell didn't kick well in the last game', that doesn't make sense to me because a world class goal kicker can turn things around in one fortnight.

D
Diarmid 640 days ago

Right, so the RFU read the Daily Mail and Clive Woodward is still picking the England team. No surprises there.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search