Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Politician Borthwick's dispiriting squad reveal – Andy Goode

Steve Borthwick (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Henry Slade’s omission is a major surprise but after another drab performance in Cardiff and a dispiriting England Rugby World Cup squad reveal, it is Steve Borthwick’s rhetoric that needs to change more than the make-up of the team.

ADVERTISEMENT

There were always going to be a few very tight calls and the Exeter man is a victim of the fact the likes of Elliot Daly and Joe Marchant are more able to cover back three as well as centre, but I was more struck by how a day that should be all about excitement felt like a bit of a damp squib.

I defy anyone watching the media conference that accompanied the squad announcement to feel enthused and it might seem like an obvious thing to say but surely the England head coach has to say we are going to France with the sole purpose of doing everything in our power to win the World Cup.

Video Spacer

England World Cup kit

Video Spacer

England World Cup kit

It doesn’t mean it is going to happen but it’s the rallying cry that every English rugby fan needs at the moment. However, instead of engaging and getting people fired up to follow the team, he danced around back-to-back questions that teed him up perfectly to do so.

We all know the current situation and the background of the past couple of years but when asked what constitutes success, the answer should simply be winning the World Cup. Anything less clearly isn’t a success.

Related

I understand the mantra of the next game being the most important – next Saturday’s Summer Nations Series rematch with Wales at Twickenham – and it was always the way when he was at Leicester too but I just feel he has to give a bit more and understand it’s part of his job to bring people along for the ride.

Borthwick is inherently wary of the media but it felt like he thought every question was out to get him, he had a pre-prepared script with a few key points and was answering every question like a politician.

ADVERTISEMENT

There is definitely an element of self-preservation or wanting to play things down so that supporters don’t get too excited and then see it as a crushing failure if England go out in a quarter-final or earlier, but that shouldn’t be the case. He has a five-year contract and is only just getting started.

England fans are at their lowest ebb in terms of connection with the national team and confidence in its chances and it was just crying out for the man at the helm to give them some belief and get the juices flowing.

Even in answering the questions regarding Slade’s exclusion, he just kept repeating that he had had conversations with everyone left out and told them all to be ready rather than giving much insight into the reasons behind the decision.

I think Joe Marchant was probably already inked in because of his versatility to play wing and centre but he was one of two shining lights, along with Lewis Ludlam, at the weekend and certainly played his way onto the plane if he wasn’t.

ADVERTISEMENT

Owen Farrell just absolutely has to start at fly-half and not centre at this World Cup. It is his time and his team to lead around the field, and I feel Borthwick is going for a starting midfield of Ollie Lawrence and Manu Tuilagi.

We know how much he values size and power in the game plan he usually adopts and that pair have the ability to get England over the gain line and provide solidity in defence, but don’t underestimate Lawrence’s ball-playing ability as well.

The pair have never previously started together and in an ideal world you want a cohesive centre partnership who know each other inside out, the kind England arguably haven’t really had since they won the World Cup in 2003, but that is just the position they’re in.

Alex Dombrandt is the other omission making the most headlines and I understand why because he has started every game under Borthwick, but he had a poor Six Nations and didn’t pull up any trees on Saturday so that is a selection based on form for me.

It’s no secret that there was a rift between the England head coach and Billy Vunipola, which has now thankfully been repaired, and I’m delighted to see the Premiership form of Ben Earl being rewarded in the back row as well.

He and Ludlam can both cover number eight, as can Tom Curry and Jack Willis in reality if needed, so Dombrandt loses out a bit because of his lack of versatility as well.

As a specialist number eight, Vunipola seems from the outside to be far more of a Borthwick-type player than Dombrandt and the pair play the position completely differently so it will be interesting to see how much that change affects the way England play, but it isn’t a shock to see the Saracens man preferred.

Related

I thought Tom Pearson might be close because he was in such dominant form at club level at the end of last season. Unfortunately, people’s lasting memory of the game in Cardiff will be of him emptied by Jac Morgan but he is a top talent and his time will come.

Elsewhere, Jack Walker being preferred to Jamie Blamire was a bit of a surprise just because he has been injured, and I’d have loved to have seen Cadan Murley included with his finishing ability but Max Malins has credit in the bank and was always likely to get the nod.

Clearly, we will see a number of changes to the team to face Wales in the second game at Twickenham this weekend but I still think we will see a few different combinations and then we have to see England’s first-choice XV start against Ireland and Fiji.

All in all, there were always going to be a few close calls but I don’t think it was as tough a squad to select as perhaps it is for Jacques Nienaber with South Africa or a few others; it just would have been good to hear a bit of straight-talking, passion and optimism to go with it.

Borthwick is as meticulous as they come and I’m sure he is saying the right things behind the scenes but what he says in the media still filters through to the players and it certainly has a big effect on how the public feel.

Team Form

Last 5 Games

1
Wins
1
1
Streak
3
19
Tries Scored
17
22
Points Difference
-77
3/5
First Try
2/5
4/5
First Points
2/5
3/5
Race To 10 Points
2/5

We have seen how the country can get behind its team in cricket and football recently and all he had to say is he is leaving no stone unturned in the quest to win the World Cup or the players can do it to get the blood pumping.

Instead, it all felt a bit deflating and like another missed opportunity to connect and create a buzz around the team and the sport. He has changed his mind on selection with the likes of Slade and Dombrandt; now Borthwick needs to rip up his script and get fans excited again.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

8 Comments
C
Chris 497 days ago

The draw is a godsend for England
They don’t have to play anyone capable until the semis. Then who knows? Even a hopeless team could fluke it. Worth a dabble

j
john 498 days ago

Could not screenshot more what does it matter how or what he says winning matches is what we want to see

A
Andrew 498 days ago

Why you believe turning himself into a court jester for the entertainment of the media will improve England's chances is anybodies guess. You of people knew what Borthwick was like with the media before he took the job. He has a simple mantra if you always win your next game you will win the world Cup. It's pretty hard to argue against that.

L
Leo 498 days ago

Omitting a proven top level defender like Sam Underhill is a mistake. Is it because he wasn't a Saracen, Sale shark or Leicester team lad.

S
Sumkunn Tsadmiova 498 days ago

Andy Goode is what we call in Bulgaria a pirogi, a dumpling. Andy Pirogi

B
BigMaul 498 days ago

“it is Steve Borthwick’s rhetoric that needs to change more than the make-up of the team.”

You lost me here. Only people who work in media believe this. Because you want him to say some interesting stuff to help you sell articles.

Real fans don’t care about his ‘rhetoric’. We just want to see some entertaining rugby. The rest of it is media nonsense side show.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 47 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Like I've said before about your idea (actually it might have been something to do with mine, I can't remember), I like that teams will a small sustainable league focus can gain the reward of more consistent CC involvement. I'd really like the most consistent option available.


Thing is, I think rugby can do better than footballs version. I think for instance I wanted everyone in it to think they can win it, where you're talking about the worst teams not giving up because they are so far off the pace we get really bad scoreline when that and giving up to concentrate on the league is happening together.


So I really like that you could have a way to remedy that, but personally I would want my model to not need that crutch. Some of this is the same problem that football has. I really like the landscape in both the URC and Prem, but Ireland with Leinster specifically, and France, are a problem IMO. In football this has turned CL pool stages in to simply cash cow fixtures for the also ran countries teams who just want to have a Real Madrid or ManC to lose to in their pool for that bumper revenue hit. It's always been a comp that had suffered for real interest until the knockouts as well (they might have changed it in recent years?).


You've got some great principles but I'm not sure it's going to deliver on that hard hitting impact right from the start without the best teams playing in it. I think you might need to think about the most minimal requirement/way/performance, a team needs to execute to stay in the Champions Cup as I was having some thougt about that earlier and had some theory I can't remember. First they could get entry by being a losing quarter finalist in the challenge, then putting all their eggs in the Champions pool play bucket in order to never finish last in their pool, all the while showing the same indifference to their league some show to EPCR rugby now, just to remain in champions. You extrapolate that out and is there ever likely to be more change to the champions cup that the bottom four sides rotate out each year for the 4 challenge teams? Are the leagues ever likely to have the sort of 'flux' required to see some variation? Even a good one like Englands.


I'd love to have a table at hand were you can see all the outcomes, and know how likely any of your top 12 teams are going break into Champions rubyg on th back it it are?

120 Go to comments
f
fl 4 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

120 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search