Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Powerhouses set to square off as 2024 July tours revealed

The All Blacks perform the Haka at Tickenham. Photo by Warren Little/Getty Images

Six huge matchups have been reported for the 2024 July tours, potentially the last of the traditionally scheduled international seasons as global rugby executives look to implement the new Nations Championship from 2026 onwards.

ADVERTISEMENT

On Wednesday, The Times reported the July 2024 slate which was “pencilled in” during a 2017 global rugby summit in San Francisco. Each series was drawn up with the initial idea of limiting player workload following a World Cup, meaning the teams would play two matches instead of the usual three. This may be amended by the time 2024 rolls around with the possibility of teams setting up non-Test matches for their fringe players.

The 2025 Lions Tour of Australia also disrupts the annual July tour schedule, so if a Nations Championship is to come into play in 2026, then the 2024 international season poses the final opportunity for the northern hemisphere teams to secure series-winning history on southern soil.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Here are the reported matchups:

England would travel to New Zealand for the first time since 2014, giving Steve Borthwick his first and potentially England’s only shot at claiming a series victory on New Zealand soil. The storylines here could be fascinating; will it be Borthwick vs Foster or Robertson – or someone else? Who will line up against Marcus Smith with the departure of both Richie Mo’unga and Beauden Barrett? How many experienced campaigners will each side be having to replace after the World Cup? That final question can of course be applied to all of the Test series.

Current World No 1 ranked Ireland would travel to current defending world champions, South Africa. Both aforementioned titles may be a distant memory by the time the sides lined up in Johannesburg. The reputation of the two sides at World Cups are polar opposites – South Africa hit form just as the 2019 tournament’s knockout stages commenced while Ireland’s critics are constantly chirping to the tune of “they’re peaking too early”. Just what kind of World Cup success each team will be riding would be sure to add plenty of intrigue and narrative to the series, as is the beginning of Ireland’s post-Johnny Sexton era.

Argentina would host France, hoping to end Les Bleus run of four straight wins and go one better than both the 2016 and 2012 tours where the two nations split the two-game series one apiece. The youthful nature of France’s team means there will be less significant turnover following the 2023 World Cup, so Los Pumas would have an almighty challenge on their hands.

Wales would visit Australia, a tour that historically, Australia has dominated. Although, with Dave Rennie’s tenure in Australia producing a weak 37% winning rate and the likes of Eddie Jones and Scott Robertson on the market, the matchup could look very different by 2024. Wales’ coaching instability makes their contribution to the tour equally as difficult to project. Similarly, the tour would offer an opportunity to turn over a new leaf for both the team in gold and in red.

ADVERTISEMENT

Scotland would tour the Pacific islands, exactly what this entails is unconfirmed. Itlay would fly to both Canada and the USA, with the latter hoping to draw more international competition as they ready themselves as hosts of the 2031 Rugby World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search