Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Praise for Farrell for having 'the bollox to talk to Maro like that'

(Photo by Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)

The Rugby Pod has delivered a glowing endorsement of Owen Farrell and his leadership in Saracens’ latest Gallagher Premiership final win, including the way he boisterously shouted at Maro Itoje to relay instructions on his behalf late in the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

The England skipper was given the man of the match award for his role in piloting the Londoners to their comeback 35-25 victory of Sale at Twickenham and his influence on proceedings was a major talking point on the podcast co-hosted by Andy Goode and Jim Hamilton.

It was at 33-25, just before Farrell shaped up to land his final conversion of the showpiece with about eight minutes remaining, when he was spotted shouting at his club and country colleague Itoje a message he wanted to be given to the rest of the team before Sale’s George Ford got around to the post-conversion restart kick from halfway.

Video Spacer

Fans give their honest reaction to Saracens winning ANOTHER Premiership Rugby title

Video Spacer

Fans give their honest reaction to Saracens winning ANOTHER Premiership Rugby title

Ex-Saracens player Hamilton was sat in amongst the Farrell family in the Twickenham stands and he was nothing but impressed with what he saw from them while watching Owen go about the business of skippering his team to its first Premiership title success since 2019. “I’m sat there with his family, watching their interaction,” began Hamilton.

“They are cool as cucumbers. They are winners. I’m sat there with all the Farrell team. So Andy Farrell, Owen’s mum, his brother, his sister, the kids. We [the Hamiltons] are up there screaming, armpits sweating everywhere, dripping, and there was no sweat on any of them [the Farrells]. They are just cool, calm, collected and they are winners – and that is what Owen is.

“Owen very rarely shows hysteria in emotion unless he wins something. Watch his emotion when he wins, that is how much it means to him. His processes are very different… that emotion and the dynamics around it, it’s all to see now, he is running the show.

“Yes, the coaches are (in charge) but they have nurtured that, they have embraced that, they have manipulated that because they know the importance of him and giving him the keys to the kingdom.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He has got the confidence and has got the bollox to talk to Maro like that – and Maro is a decent player in his own right. I’m not saying George Ford doesn’t do that. Dan Biggar does it to his players as well… Johnny Sexton does it. Unapologetically as well.”

Co-host Goode, the ex-England out-half, added: “You overstep the mark sometimes, no doubt. I used to do it at the clubs I was at, but the difference when Owen does it is he is playing at the top of his game and he is the leader and he is the one you can’t even question anything he does because look at his performances on the pitch, he is out of this world.

“He has added so many strings to his bow this year, like ball-playing skills. There was a flip out the back at the weekend as well. He is just ridiculous in a 10 jersey, head and shoulders above anyone else, and when you are the leader, when you are the boss, you are that driver of a team. That is what brings the best out of other players when you have that much intensity. He is the king, basically.”

Hamilton agreed, going on to question why coaches such as Eddie Jones and Steve Borthwick with England and Warren Gatland with the Lions have picked Farrell at inside centre rather than at out-half. “I thought this at the weekend when I was sitting watching him play and he was up against Ford, going to 12 ruined him a bit.

ADVERTISEMENT

“He wanted to be in that position because he was put in that position and he wanted to play for England and the Lions. Naturally, he is going to be like, yes, but I reckon that was the blip in his career… How is everyone else picking him there? That is the weird thing. You have got some of the best coaches in the world that are picking him at 12.

Goode understood. “He [Farrell] is an alpha 10 that needs to be running the show. I have said it millions of times. Moving to 12 he is nowhere near the player he is because he can’t influence everyone in that same way.

“They [other coaches] are looking at it from a different view of, ‘I want to get my best players on the field in any which way’ and what Owen has done is shown everyone that he is the king at 10 and that is where his strengths are. Yes, he can fill a role at 12 if it is best for the team and he is never going to say, ‘No, don’t f***ing pick me at 12, I want to play 10’.

“You ask in an interview, he is happy to play 12 but deep down he wants to be the boss and when you give him that backing that he has got with the players around him and his own abilities, he is by far the best 10 comfortably in the Premiership and some.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion' 'Tom has the potential to be better than a British and Irish Lion'
Search