Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Pre-match analysis: France vs Scotland

Scotland's Grant Gilchrist battles with French forwards in 2018 (Photo by Lynne Cameron/Getty Images)

Recently, the pilloried French coach Jacques Brunel has given the impression of a child at the controls of a fighter jet – pushing any button and grabbing any lever in the hope it somehow takes off.

ADVERTISEMENT

Against England, he played a centre on each wing and a wing at full-back while his form scrum-half, Antoine Dupont, sat on the bench and his starting nine, Morgan Parra, ambled around aimlessly. France played with the conviction of a newborn lamb and the cohesion of a giraffe on an ice rink. Their 44-8 shellacking was utterly deserved and deeply humiliating; such a grand rugby nation shamed by so fierce a foe.

In the aftermath, Parra and his half-back partner Camille Lopez did not conceal their feelings about the coaching.
“I think that we are capable of doing what the English do, but are we working on this during training? I think we don’t work on it enough, even not at all,” said Parra.

“We are the first to be at fault, us the players, since we are on the field. But I think it is not just us, and we are not alone in this disaster,” added Lopez.

The Clermont two were duly booted out of not just the starting XV but the entire match-day squad for the visit of Scotland. Brunel insists the omissions are strictly “a sporting choice”, but he’d have a job getting even Joey Tribbiani to swallow that one.

Equally damning was the testimony of Sebastian Vahamaahina after France capitulated at home to Wales, chucking a 16-0 half-time lead on the opening weekend.

“I did not even know I was captain. It was the referee, Wayne Barnes, who came to see me on a penalty to ask me my choice,” the lock said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I told him to address the captain; he said it was me. The staff did not warn me.”

There is talk of a revolt against Brunel and evidence to back it up. The famous French newspaper Midi-Olympique has reported that FFR president Bernard Laporte read the squad the riot act this week and ran quotes from an unnamed player saying “nobody knew which position to play” in the second half at Twickenham.

“It was chaos. We were lost on the pitch and tried to ask the bench,” he went on.

These aren’t poor rugby players we’re talking about. Gael Fickou and Yoann Huget have scored a combined total of 15 tries for their clubs this season but Brunel is playing them out of position. World-class athletes look tentative, jaded and forlorn. In football parlance, it seems Brunel has “lost the dressing room” and whatever bond he had with his team has decayed.

Again, he has revved up his selection tombola but whether by design or by luck, he has thrown together a much more encouraging and progressive backline this week. For starters, Huget and Fickou are shifted to their preferred (and best) positions of wing and centre respectively. At this point, France are as well exposing their burgeoning talents to Test rugby and Thomas Ramos, the electric Toulouse full-back, gets his first start aged 23. Dupont, a year younger, finally wears the number nine jersey. Nineteen-year-old Romain Ntamack made his debut at centre against Wales and was benched against England – he is a gamble at fly-half, but an exciting one in what, according to statistics supremo Simon Gleave, is the ninth starting half-back pairing fielded by France in the championship since the last World Cup. These blokes are well good enough to forge an immense future in Test rugby – whether the madcap selection policy allows them time to flourish is another matter.

ADVERTISEMENT
Antoine Dupont of France looks for space under pressure from Luke Cowan-Dickie of England during the Guiness Six Nations match between England and France at Twickenham Stadium. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Damian Penaud is still a fish out of water in the 14 jersey and you fancy Scotland will try to expose his flaws as ruthlessly as Jonny May and England did a fortnight ago. But France still have a monster pack with enough beef to stick it up the jumper and bludgeon their way forward if, as may well be the case, they start to run out of ideas.
Les Bleus are in a hideous state. They have lost ten of the 13 Tests on Brunel’s watch. This is Scotland’s best chance to win in Paris since that incredible day in 1999, but still, you don’t feel too bullish about their prospects of actually making it happen.

Continue reading below…
Watch: Scotland Assistant Coach Mike Blair on France clash

Video Spacer

Take Italy out of the picture, and Scotland last won an away Six Nations match nine years ago.
They began the championship with an injury list of 20. Some of those – most notably Zander Fagerson, Magnus Bradbury, George Turner and Fraser Brown – have returned to fitness but more of their biggest beasts have fallen.

Their first-choice back-row from last year – captain John Barclay, Hamish Watson and Ryan Wilson – are all out. Sam Skinner is crocked and so is WP Nel. Huw Jones’ championship is over. Stuart Hogg is battling to get himself back from a shoulder problem in time to play England in the final game and Finn Russell has not recovered from a concussion suffered on club duty. That’s eight near-certain starters – effectively half a team – unavailable to Gregor Townsend and a barrage of their rivals already on the treatment table. It is a brutal position and an epic test of Scotland’s resources.

Most grievous of all is the loss of Russell, who sustained the head injury playing for Racing 92 on Sunday. This is a troubling scenario for Scotland. Russell knows the mountain of Euros he pockets comes at a physical price – Racing want their handsomely-paid superstar on the field. But when player welfare is, apparently, everyone’s number-one priority, pitching him into a Top 14 match after back-to-back Tests, six days before his next international, hardly seems humanitarian. Greig Laidlaw played 80 minutes for Clermont last weekend too and mercifully for Scotland emerged intact.

Continue reading below…
Watch: Scotland captain Greig Laidlaw ahead of Saturday’s Six Nations Test with France.

Video Spacer

Townsend has fine alternatives to most of his sidelined contingent – Blair Kinghorn for Hogg, Nick Grigg for Jones, Bradbury for Wilson – but he doesn’t have another 10 of Russell’s brilliance just now. Pete Horne, who gets the nod, is a clever and underrated deputy, but he is better deployed at inside centre and not in Russell’s class as a play-maker. He hasn’t played a Test at fly-half since November 2017 and has started only two of his 39 caps in the pivot position. Adam Hastings is the long-term rival to Russell but he is still very raw and his Glasgow form of late has been decidedly flaky. Chucking him into the fray in front of 80,000 would have been an exceedingly bold call. As BBC analyst Colin Gregor put it, Townsend must find a way of replacing the irreplaceable.

France may be a basket-case, but Scotland have their challenges too. They have a riveting squad with talents everywhere and if they are ever going to realise their potential – if they are ever going to amount to anything – these are the matches they have to nail. Even with that injury list, even without Russell, Townsend fields a strong line-up. If they can’t win in Paris now, when will they?

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 22 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Like I've said before about your idea (actually it might have been something to do with mine, I can't remember), I like that teams will a small sustainable league focus can gain the reward of more consistent CC involvement. I'd really like the most consistent option available.


Thing is, I think rugby can do better than footballs version. I think for instance I wanted everyone in it to think they can win it, where you're talking about the worst teams not giving up because they are so far off the pace we get really bad scoreline when that and giving up to concentrate on the league is happening together.


So I really like that you could have a way to remedy that, but personally I would want my model to not need that crutch. Some of this is the same problem that football has. I really like the landscape in both the URC and Prem, but Ireland with Leinster specifically, and France, are a problem IMO. In football this has turned CL pool stages in to simply cash cow fixtures for the also ran countries teams who just want to have a Real Madrid or ManC to lose to in their pool for that bumper revenue hit. It's always been a comp that had suffered for real interest until the knockouts as well (they might have changed it in recent years?).


You've got some great principles but I'm not sure it's going to deliver on that hard hitting impact right from the start without the best teams playing in it. I think you might need to think about the most minimal requirement/way/performance, a team needs to execute to stay in the Champions Cup as I was having some thougt about that earlier and had some theory I can't remember. First they could get entry by being a losing quarter finalist in the challenge, then putting all their eggs in the Champions pool play bucket in order to never finish last in their pool, all the while showing the same indifference to their league some show to EPCR rugby now, just to remain in champions. You extrapolate that out and is there ever likely to be more change to the champions cup that the bottom four sides rotate out each year for the 4 challenge teams? Are the leagues ever likely to have the sort of 'flux' required to see some variation? Even a good one like Englands.


I'd love to have a table at hand were you can see all the outcomes, and know how likely any of your top 12 teams are going break into Champions rubyg on th back it it are?

120 Go to comments
f
fl 3 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Right, so even if they were the 4 worst teams in Champions Cup, you'd still have them back by default?"

I think (i) this would literally never happen, (ii) it technically couldn't quite happen, given at least 1 team would qualify via the challenge cup, so if the actual worst team in the CC qualified it would have to be because they did really well after being knocked down to the challenge cup.

But the 13th-15th teams could qualify and to be fair I didn't think about this as a possibility. I don't think a team should be able to qualify via the Champions Cup if they finish last in their group.


Overall though I like my idea best because my thinking is, each league should get a few qualification spots, and then the rest of the spots should go to the next best teams who have proven an ability to be competitive in the champions cup. The elite French clubs generally make up the bulk of the semi-final spots, but that doesn't (necessarily) mean that the 5th-8th best French clubs would be competitive in a slimmed down champions cup. The CC is always going to be really great competition from the semis onwards, but the issue is that there are some pretty poor showings in the earlier rounds. Reducing the number of teams would help a little bit, but we could improve things further by (i) ensuring that the on-paper "worst" teams in the competition have a track record of performing well in the CC, and (ii) by incentivising teams to prioritise the competition. Teams that have a chance to win the whole thing will always be incentivised to do that, but my system would incentivise teams with no chance of making the final to at least try to win a few group stage matches.


"I'm afraid to say"

Its christmas time; there's no need to be afraid!

120 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death' Jamie Cudmore: I want to help rescue Canada from a 'slow agonising death'
Search