Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Premier Sports set to swoop in for Champions Cup rights

Ross Byrne, left, and Jamie Osborne of Leinster walk out before the Investec Champions Cup final between Leinster and Toulouse at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium in London, England. (Photo By Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

If bookies had been offering odds on where the next rights to broadcast EPCR’s Champions and Challenge Cups were going they’d be closing that window now. Negotiations kicked off this week on heads of agreement for a three years deal for Mickey O’Rourke’s Premier Sports, valued at circa €15m-20m, to step into the space once dominated by heavyweight outfits.

ADVERTISEMENT

O’Rourke would argue that if the Is are dotted and the Ts are crossed then his company will class themselves in exactly that division for rugby, on top of his football interests.

Consider that Premier already have the URC contract, which has a year to run but where the door is already open on what happens next, along with the UK and Irish rights to screen Top 14 games, so adding EPCR to the stable would be a huge step forward.

Video Spacer

How would Super Rugby teams fare in the Champions Cup? | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 8:53
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 8:53
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    How would Super Rugby teams fare in the Champions Cup? | Aotearoa Rugby Pod

    The lads have plenty of big club games to react to this week after finals in Europe and Japan as well as some huge results in Super Rugby Pacific. We start by dissecting the games in Christchurch and Hamilton before casting an eye over the Champions Cup final.

    It will be next month when EPCR expect to make a statement on the result. It’s understood DAZN have been the other interested party but it would be a seismic shift to take Premier out of the picture at this point.

    Their spot on the podium has come in the first place courtesy of TNT’s ambitions in the international game – they already are long-time partners of PRL’s Gallagher Premiership –  and secondly because of O’Rourke’s ability and drive.

    Once it became clear earlier this year that TNT would succeed Amazon as the broadcaster of the Autumn Nations games the picture changed. Those 21 Test matches in November – featuring the top-ranked 12 countries in the rugby world, plus Portugal – will get the full treatment, making them look like part of a branded tournament rather than simply standalone games.

    That runout, if successful, would leave TNT perfectly positioned to chase the rights to World Rugby’s Nations League, which kicks off in 2026. The exact shape of that new competition has yet to be finalised but its value – the calling card for rugby’s global season – will be huge.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    The net effect left the TNT cookie jar virtually empty when it came to feeding EPCR and their Champions and Challenge Cups. At the time EPCR made noises about being happy with the options left to them but it has taken O’Rourke’s interest to calm them down.

    The challenge for a man widely respected in the broadcasting business would be to cover the tournaments in a way that doesn’t leave subscribers feeling production values have slipped. From the days of Sky, and then BT Sport – TNT’s previous incarnation – European rugby has benefitted from a full-court press in its coverage and presentation.

    First, O’Rourke has to get the fine print sorted out. Given his record of getting deals done, you’d understand why bookies would consider this home and hosed.

    Related

     

    ADVERTISEMENT
    Play Video

    South Africa vs Black Ferns XV | Women's International | Full Match Replay

    Play Video

    Namibia vs United Arab Emirates | Asia/Africa Rugby World Cup Play-off | Full Match Replay

    Play Video

    Lions Share | Episode 5

    Play Video

    Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

    Play Video

    Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

    Play Video

    The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

    Play Video

    KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

    Play Video

    New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    1 Comment
    H
    Hellhound 374 days ago

    As of this season, the South African teams will be fully going for the European Championships, becoming full partners, unlike last season where the URC was the main priority. As a Bulls fan, I'm extremely excited.

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Long Reads

    Comments on RugbyPass

    J
    JW 33 minutes ago
    New Zealanders may not understand, but in France Test rugby is the 'B movie'

    But he was wrong, he had to take back what he said. But maybe this only happened because he came out and was honest with his initial plans?


    He’s simply in a position where he should be far more professional.


    I don’t really follow much media, especially SM, but again, I’ve not seen anyone complaining. Plenty of ridicule and pointing out things like it being disrespectful to the game, but as far as the English language goes, that’s not complaining. Nick Bishop for instance hasn’t been complaining, he’s simply saying Galthie made a bad decision for France’s prospects (which when the common reply is ‘thats how it is’).


    Complaining would be views expressing that the FFR should have put the tour back a week so that all T14 finalists could attend. Complaining would be saying they’ve been robbed of seeing the worlds best stars. Complaining would be saying players can simply take extra weeks off from T14. I’ve only seen advice and suggestions that these are things France need to look-at-for-the-future.


    Basically I tried to communicate with French fans because they don’t understand what’s being communicated. ALL reactions I have seen shared here by French supports have all seemed way over the top compared what I’ve seen expressed about this tour.

    the players are expected to play in too many matches, for too many minutes, and need more rest and recovery time.

    This is the message I have been sharing. So something needs to happen, whether thats France pull out of more Internationals or rest players from more domestic games, who knows, but I also don’t think what they have now is working. It’s obviously much better than 3-4 years ago, but they appear to want to work even harder at it like you say. Personally I’ve only seen LNR be reasonable, I hear much less of their other internationals being denied/influenced not to play, so I imagine that they will give even further (as I can’t really see France pulling out the other international windows as well).

    147 Go to comments
    J
    JW 1 hour ago
    'The Wallabies only have themselves to blame': How the Lions sunk Australia in Melbourne

    Cameron Woki picked at the base of a ruck and jumped/dived over. That would clearly now be penalised.

    But the Sheehan try is different to my eye. It starts from a tap penalty, he drives forward, the two WB defenders go low for a tackle in the assumption Sheehan will go to ground. He does not, but seeing the hole now left dives through it. In this case surely there is zero danger there.

    World Rugby’s terminology/interpretation recently (shared again after this) is that it’s ok to hurdle/dive (that includes over, say a ruck, which we have seen this many times even in this years SR) to score a try, but it’s not (OK) to avoid a tackle. I can’t remember the one you describe (which may have been where their clarification came from) but that would sound OK. Sheehan definitely was playing the rope-a-dope and dived to avoid being tackled (can’t call it tackled really, just blocked/stopped lol), so shouldn’t have been awarded (I wasn’t aware of this last definition so just thought it was a very smart move). Was it premeditated? I’m not sure, but he could definitely have collected someones head if that was the case. And I guess even if he saw the space, I guess it’s not something they can allow as others might try it and get it terribly wrong?


    Well summed up Miz. I have been thinking the whole situation of events that lead to this type of sneaky move is the problem, particularly as it relates to the difficulty and effort defenders now go to stop such situations (like say Slippers try), where players go extremely low to drive from meters out (and in most cases plays just trying to dive under). It’s also ugly business seeing attempt after attempt to go in under the tacklers, especially with them not really being able to perform a ‘tackle’ at all. I would simply give the defenders their goal line. All they need is some part of the body on or behind, and this will stop the play (being the fuel to this fire) from being attempted I reckon.

    39 Go to comments
    LONG READ
    LONG READ ‘There are coaches who make you believe in yourself more than ever. Steve is one of those’ ‘There are coaches who make you believe in yourself more than ever. Steve is one of those’