Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Premiership club boss backs radical 'one host' Six Nations idea

(Photo by Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)

Exeter boss Rob Baxter has outlined that staging the upcoming Six Nations in one country to ensure that spectators could attend the matches could be far more preferable than the deflating prospect of the games going ahead behind closed doors – as happened in the 2021 championship. The half-dozen Six Nations unions took a massive financial hit by going ahead with the tournament last year as scheduled.

ADVERTISEMENT

No fans were present at the 15 games in a competition won by Wales and while the outlook greatly improved after that with the recent Autumn Nations Cup matches hosting capacity crowds at places such as Twickenham, Murrayfield, the Principality, Aviva Stadium and Stade de France, fresh pandemic restrictions have led to concerns that the upcoming 2022 Six Nations will be severely affected by crowd attendance and travel red tape. 

Crowd capacity at live sports events in France, Ireland, Scotland and Wales has been severely cut in recent weeks, with the latter two countries having to essentially close their doors completely to spectators at club matches (the limit is 500 in Scotland, 0 in Wales). It has sparked fears regarding the stadium capacities for Six Nations matches in February and March. 

Video Spacer

England’s Lewis Ludlam guests on RugbyPass Offload

Video Spacer

England’s Lewis Ludlam guests on RugbyPass Offload

There have already been reports that the WRU are checking out the possibility of staging its home matches in England as there have been no restrictions in that country regarding attendances at live sports events and it has now generated speculation that the Six Nations could potentially mirror the Rugby Championship and have the tournament hosted in a single country, namely England. 

The 2020 Tri-Nations was staged in Australia in front of spectators as was the majority of the 2021 Rugby Championship and the idea that England might potentially host all 15 games in the 2022 Six Nations received the support on Wednesday of Rob Baxter, the boss of the Exeter Chiefs who will likely be in the running to succeed Eddie Jones as England coach following the 2023 World Cup. 

In contrast to the restrictions affecting rugby in neighbouring countries, Exeter just last weekend played host to a record Sandy Park attendance and with stadiums in England set to remain open to full capacity and not be subjected to crowd restrictions, Baxter reckoned the idea that England could stage the entire Six Nations would be far better than the prospect of matches going ahead elsewhere behind closed doors or being postponed.  

“The broader view would be that it should be played across the countries because that is very much the rugby view but if they just want to cancel the tournament (or play it behind closed doors), it will mean that income across all the home unions will be severely disrupted and that will have a knock-on effect greater than the professional game… the repercussions will be greater than that. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“It isn’t for me to decide where a tournament should happen. It should be a broader discussion but I would think with the problem we have had with Covid recently, the unions are stretched on income and revenue already. With every sporting body, revenue is the biggest thing that has been damaged so anything that can keep revenue online has got to be preferable to binning things for a season. It has got to be. We have all got to find a way to keep going and keep revenue coming in, the same in any business you have got to explore those options.

“From a rugby perspective, the whole beauty of the Six Nations has been that change of environment, that change of potential weather conditions, that change in the whole situation is what has been fantastic about the Six Nations historically. It’s interesting, isn’t it? The game that comes to mind the most for various reasons, especially for me as an Englishman, is England going really well in the tournament and then being derailed at the last by going to play Scotland or Wales or Ireland.

“Those are the great challenges, that is what makes the Six Nations a great competition to win. You see French teams, one week they can beat anybody in the world in Paris and then the next week it doesn’t go quite so well in Cardiff. Those are the things that you see and that is the beauty of the tournament. That is from a rugby perspective which is what I am sure we all want to see happen. 

“That said, we can’t all sit here and pretend the world is in an ideal place at the moment and the reality is that if a tournament can go ahead with crowds that financially will help all the unions carry on and thrive and gain enough money to carry on their rugby programmes. 

ADVERTISEMENT

“You need to remember for the national bodies their responsibility for the game goes beyond professional sport, they go down right to grassroots rugby, so if playing the tournament provides a level of income that cancelling it or no crowds or however you want to look at it would break, then you look at the next-best scenario. If the next best scenario is to play it in one country but you can have sell-out crowds and you can raise some revenue and you can keep that income going through all the bodies, then that has got to be better than cancelling it.”

Before the Six Nations is due to start, the Champions Cup is supposed to complete its pool schedule but that is in jeopardy due to the red tape introduced pre-Christmas by the French government and resulted in the postponement of numerous round two games.  

Asked if the one-country host idea might be a way for the EPCR to complete its 2021/22 tournament, Baxter added: “Because of those travel regulations, because of the spread of the tournament, would it be possible? I don’t know. With the Six Nations, you could in theory create a bubble in one country and the tournament gets done in one block with no further travel. I don’t think you can see the (European) tournament out without that travel in between.”      

 

ADVERTISEMENT

KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

Lions Share | Episode 4

Zimbabwe vs Namibia | Rugby Africa Cup Final | Full Match Replay

USA vs Fiji | Women's International | Full Match Replay

Tattoos & Rugby: Why are tattoos so popular with sportspeople? | Amber Schonert | Rugby Rising Locker Room Season 2

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
L
LY 1295 days ago

England really is that afraid of playing away matches.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NH 1 hour ago
'The Wallabies need to convert much better - or Melbourne could be much worse'

Nice one as always Brett. I think the stats hide a bit of the dominance the lions had, and they would look alot worse in that first half when the game was more in the balance. You mention it here but I think it hasn’t been talked about enough was the lineout. The few times the wallabies managed to exit their half and get an opportunity to attack in the 1st half, the lineout was lost. This was huge in terms of lions keeping momentum and getting another chance to attack, rather than the wallabies getting their chance and to properly ‘exit’ their half. The other one you touch on re “the will jordan bounce of the ball” - is kick chase/receipt. I thought that the wallabies kicked relatively well (although were beaten in this area - Tom L rubbish penalty kicks for touch!), but our kick receipt and chase wasn’t good enough jorgenson try aside. In the 1st half there was a moment where russell kicked for a 50:22 and potter fumbled it into touch after been caught out of position, lynagh makes a similar kick off 1st phase soon after and keenan is good enough to predict the kick, catch it at his bootlaces and put a kick in. That kick happened to go out on the full but it was a demonstration on the difference in positioning etc. This meant that almost every contested kick that was spilled went the way of the lions, thats no accident, that is a better chase, more urgency, more players in the area. Wallabies need to be better in who fields their kicks getting maxy and wright under most of them and Lynagh under less, and the chase needs to be the responsibility of not just one winger but a whole group of players who pressure not just the catch but the tackle, ruck and following phase.

17 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us

Thanks for the further background to player welfare metrics Nick.


Back on the last article I noted that WR is now dedicating a whole section in their six-point business plan to this topic. It also noted that studies indicated 85-90% of workload falls outside of playing. So in respect to your point on the classification of ‘involvements’ included even subs with a low volume of minutes, it actually goes further, to the wider group of players that train as if they’re going to be required to start on the weekend, even if they’re outside the 23. That makes even the 30-35 game borderline pale into insignificance.


No doubt it is won of the main reasons why France has a quota on the number of one clubs players in their International camps, and rotate in other clubs players through the week. The number of ‘invisible’ games against a player suggests the FFRs 25 game limit as more appropriate?


So if we take it at face value that Galthie and the FFR have got it right, only a dozen players from the last 60 international caps should have gone on this tour. More players from the ‘Scotland 23’ than the more recent 23.


The only real pertinent question is what do players prefer more, health or money? There are lots of ethical decisions, like for instance whether France could make a market like Australia’s where their biggest rugby codes have yearly broadcast deals of 360 and 225 million euros. They do it by having a 7/8 month season.

68 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why New Zealand learned more from their July series than France Why New Zealand learned more from their July series than France