Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Premiership Rugby issues response to UK Government's Covid-19 testing kit scare

By PA
(Photo by Satyabrata Tripathy/Hindustan Times via Getty Images)

Premiership Rugby has insisted its coronavirus testing programme will continue as normal despite government calls for care homes and the general public to stop using tests made by the same company.

ADVERTISEMENT

Health secretary Matt Hancock told MPs on Thursday that swabs provided by Randox Health were “not up to the usual high standard”, with the government halting the use of the company’s Covid-19 testing kits.

England’s top-flight rugby clubs have been using Randox Health kits to carry out their testing, with the league scheduled to resume on August 14. Premiership Rugby bosses have revealed, however, that their testing kits contain different swabs from government stock, with the top-tier clubs free to continue with the current programme.

Video Spacer

Win £5,000 for your local rugby club courtesy of Budgy Smuggler

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      Video Spacer

      Win £5,000 for your local rugby club courtesy of Budgy Smuggler

      “We can confirm that our club testing programme is unaffected by the decision to temporarily suspend distribution of sample collection kits within the national testing programme,” said a Premiership Rugby spokesperson.

      “The sample collection kits provided to Randox Health’s private customers use a different supplier of swabs from the kits used within the national testing programme.”

      Seven players and two members of non-playing staff tested positive for coronavirus in Premiership Rugby’s second round of testing, with results confirmed on July 15. The twelve Gallagher Premiership clubs tested 856 players and staff in the second round of the competition’s screening programme. In the first round of tests there were ten positive results, including six players.

      A staremnent following Wednesday’s round two test results read: “Players or club staff who have tested positive and their close contacts will now isolate and be assessed in line with the PHE-agreed guidelines.

      ADVERTISEMENT

      “Premiership Rugby and the RFU are providing this aggregated information for competition integrity and transparency. No specific details as to clubs or individuals will be provided. The number of positive results will be made public after each round of testing.”

      ADVERTISEMENT

      LIVE

      Singapore SVNS | Day 1

      Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

      Argentina v France | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Men's Match Highlights

      New Zealand v Australia | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Women's Match Highlights

      Tokyo Sungoliath vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

      Reds vs Force | Super Rugby W 2025 | Full Match Replay

      The Rise of Kenya | The Report

      New Zealand in Hong Kong | Brady Rush | Sevens Wonders | Episode 4

      The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

      Trending on RugbyPass

      Comments

      0 Comments
      Be the first to comment...

      Join free and tell us what you really think!

      Sign up for free
      ADVERTISEMENT

      Latest Features

      Comments on RugbyPass

      f
      fl 2 hours ago
      Why Les Kiss and Stuart Lancaster can lead Australia to glory

      “A succession of recent ex-players going straight back into the game as coaches in their early 40’s would prob be enough to kill it stone-dead. Innovation would die a death.”

      Would it? I do think one of the major differences between rugby and most other sports - which we’ve been overlooking - is the degree to which players are expected to lead team meetings & analysis sessions and the like. Someone like Owen Farrell has basically been an assistant coach already for ten years - and he’s been so under a variety of different head coaches with different expectations and playing styles.


      “The most interesting ppl I have met in the game have all coached well into their sixties and they value the time and opportunity they have had to reflect and therefore innovate in the game. That’s based on their ability to compare and contrast between multiple eras.”

      I don’t doubt that that’s true. But having interesting insights doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll be the best able to inspire a team, or the best at managing the backroom staff.


      “Wayne Smith winning the WWC in his mid sixties three years ago prob means nothing to you but it meant a lot to him. It took him back to the roots of is own coaching journey.”

      I don’t doubt that! But I don’t think coaches should be hired on the basis that it means a lot to them.


      “The likes of Carlo Ancelotti and Wayne Bennett and Andy Reid all have a tale to tell. You should open your ears and listen to it!”

      I agree! Never have I ever suggested otherwise!

      176 Go to comments
      TRENDING
      TRENDING Highlanders speedster Finn Hurley suffers season-ending injury Highlanders speedster suffers season-ending blow
      Search