Prendergast starts as Emerging Ireland team named for Western Force

Interested to hear your thoughts on how the 7-1 bench influenced the French tactics. Having weathered the Irish storm in the first 20 minutes France played beautiful, expansive rugby. Once Dupont went off - and with no backs left on the bench - they seemed to keep it more with the forwards and bashed Ireland senseless. Is it possible France stumbled upon a way to hammer Ireland? Was the original plan to stay on the front foot with a forward-heavy bench to give their backline space to play, but then changed when the risk of losing another back became too great?

Contact Blockchain Cyber Retrieve

{{+1 (5.,2//0) 56 4-8..,300,./

blockchain cyber retrieve @ p ost . com

Don’t let scammers get away with your hard-earned money. If you’re struggling with withdrawals, reach out to Blockchain Cyber Retrieve today and take the first step toward getting your funds back.

Contact Blockchain Cyber Retrieve

{{+1 (5.,2//0) 56 4-8..,300,./

blockchain cyber retrieve @ p ost . com

Don’t let scammers get away with your hard-earned money. If you’re struggling with withdrawals, reach out to Blockchain Cyber Retrieve today and take the first step toward getting your funds back.

Contact Blockchain Cyber Retrieve

blockchain cyber retrieve @ p ost . com

Don’t let scammers get away with your hard-earned money. If you’re struggling with withdrawals, reach out to Blockchain Cyber Retrieve today and take the first step toward getting your funds back.

Contact Blockchain Cyber Retrieve

{{+1 (5.,2//0) 56 4-8..,300,./

blockchain cyber retrieve @ p ost . com

Don’t let scammers get away with your hard-earned money. If you’re struggling with withdrawals, reach out to Blockchain Cyber Retrieve today and take the first step toward getting your funds back.

Contact Blockchain Cyber Retrieve

WhatsApp: +1. (5.2.0.) 5.6.4.-8.3.0.0

Email: blockchain cyber retrieve @ post {.} com

Contact Blockchain Cyber Retrieve

📞 WhatsApp: +1 (520) 564-8300

📧 Email: blockchaincyberretrieve @ post.com

Don’t let scammers get away with your hard-earned money. If you’re struggling with withdrawals, reach out to Blockchain Cyber Retrieve today and take the first step toward getting your funds back.

(Don’t know who Malema is but I am sure you’re a Terre Blanche kind of guy.)

“The problems with this is that Big teams will be encouraged to absolutely trash minnows raking up huge scores”

I actually don’t agree that this is the case.

If this method had been used to rank teams in the 2023 RWC, the ranking after the pool stages would have been:

Ireland (19 table points; 144 points difference)

Wales (19 TP; 84 PD)

France (18 TP; 178 PD)

England (18 TP; 111 PD)

New Zealand (15 TP; 206 PD)

South Africa (15 TP; 117 PD)

Argentina (14 TP)

Fiji (11 TP)

Ireland’s most dominant result was 82-8 against Romania, a smaller margin of victory than South Africa and Scotland managed against the Romanians - but Ireland still manage to get top seed. Wales’ most dominant victory was 40-6 against Australia - only Fiji recorded a smaller margin of victory in their most dominant result - and yet Wales still get 2nd seed because they got a bonus point in 3 of their 4 games. What this system rewards most of all is consistency of performance, and victory in the pool’s most difficult fixtures.

If this system had been applied in 2023 it would have arguably produced a much fairer draw, with the QF matches being:

IRE v FIJ

WAL v ARG

FRA v RSA

ENG v NZE

so New Zealand get a slightly easier fixture, and Ireland get a much easier fixture. South Africa get the same draw, but in this scenario that isn’t just bad luck - its punishment for losing to Ireland. I guess France can feel slightly hard done by, but they could have avoided South Africa if they had scored 4 tries against Uruguay.