Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Prime Position: No Woman No Try

No Woman No Try Amazon Prime Premiere- Credit: Hera Media

‘No Woman No Try’ releases on 25 March 2022, marking Amazon’s latest addition to a growing bank of sports documentaries. The film follows three female rugby players through the 2020/21 season, pulling back the curtain on the highs and lows of the game. 

ADVERTISEMENT

Director Victoria Rush explains that the idea for the documentary came about in the wake of the 2020 ‘I Am Enough’ movement, a response to Canterbury using models rather than rugby players to showcase their women’s Ireland kit.

Despite massive amounts of social media traction within the women’s rugby community and an apology from Canterbury, Rush felt that the ‘I Am Enough’ movement was stuck in an echo chamber and not making real impact and change.

Video Spacer

Youth Unstoppables – Mastercard

Video Spacer

Youth Unstoppables – Mastercard

Speaking to RugbyPass, Rush says: “We know social media wouldn’t have been big enough on its own, what we created next had to be bigger. It had to be bigger than rugby, it had to be bigger than sport and I had to speak to the collective experiences of women all over the world.

“I felt that the best way for something like this to be seen and heard was a documentary shedding light on the incredible stories of these women in our sport. Breaking down barriers, creating conversations and making stars of female rugby players.”

Shaunagh Brown, one of the players featured in the documentary, is made for the screen; a ball of energy, the England and Harlequins prop cuts a charismatic figure who isn’t afraid to tell it like it is. Speaking on gender stereotypes, Brown is full of no nonsense one liners, noting that she “didn’t stop wearing a dress to go against society”, rather that she “just wanted to hang upside down on monkey bars without showing [her] knickers.” It’s no surprise that Brown’s childhood was full of rough and tumble outdoor play – before rising to rugby stardom in a mere three seasons, Brown also represented England in the hammer throw at the 2014 Commonwealth Games.

https://twitter.com/victoriahrush/status/1499697584788680704?s=20&t=_J1GxyE-KMoMt2Yc_GEFFQ

Next up is Zainab Alema, a growing presence in both social media and the rugby world. The Richmond prop has gone public with her ambition to become the first black Muslim woman to play for England’s Red Roses. Her initial vision was to see a Muslim woman representing her country, but after some reflection the prop decided to dream bigger – why shouldn’t that woman be her?

ADVERTISEMENT

No Woman No Try overlays Alema speaking about her rugby goals (cup of Earl Grey in hand) with footage of the prop’s hard carries – there’s a reason team-mates call her ‘the bulldozer’. Will she make it? We’ll have to wait and see, but that’s not really the point.

Regardless of whether Alema achieves her dreams, having a visible role model not just on the field but in the public eye could be a game changer for other girls and women picking up the oval ball. On finding out that it was “there in black and white” in the lawbook that hijab was allowed on the field, Zainab Alema stepped back into rugby – now she can inspire other women like her to do the same.

On the subject of clothing, let’s turn to Stefania Evans. As well as playing in the Premiership for Richmond, Bristol Bears and now Worcester Warriors, Evans is the founder of the astoundingly popular Ruggette RFC, a rugby apparel brand catering exclusively for women.

Perhaps ‘astoundingly popular’ isn’t quite the right phrase here – 2.7 million women play rugby globally with a rise in interest of up to 45% and yet there is very little provision for women in terms of female-fit kit (as shown by Harlequins’ gaffe this season). Evans speaks about how she is often faced with concerns from buyers around only wanting to buy one fit of shorts for men’s and women’s teams, to which she responds “women have worn the men’s shorts for the last 75 years, why not swap it over for one year and have the men wear women’s fit?”

ADVERTISEMENT

Ruggette has grown exponentially since inception, demonstrating the appetite for smart investments and business opportunity within women’s rugby. First mover advantage will favour those who invest early – women’s sports fans are more likely to purchase products linked to their sport, and make the bulk of household spending decisions. Selling the game day experience is also an area which clubs should work on – as Evans neatly put it “it’s not my uterus’ fault I don’t have a half time show and merchandise on sale”. Shaunagh Brown agrees, asking investors to “give women an opportunity and we will show we are worthy, as we always do.”

Despite the fact that 40% of athletes in the UK are female, they receive only 3% of sports media coverage. The quality of such coverage is objectively poorer than that afforded to their male counterparts. Although some games from the Premier 15s are now shown on BBC iPlayer, the majority require logging in to an obscure website through a complex registration process to access sub-par live streams.

‘No Woman No Try’ is a landmark event in terms of quality footage and production in a film exclusively about women’s rugby. Despite running over 75 minutes, there is the sense that there are still stories left untold, and it would be unsurprising if Amazon were to build on this with an All or Nothing style documentary on a Premier 15s team in future. All in all, ‘No Woman No Try’ showcases the game in all its grit and glory, from the training field right up to Premiership success – and it’s a bloody good watch.

‘How can we support women’s rugby?’, I hear the men reading this ask – and during the film former England and Harlequins wing and rugby pundit Ugo Monye asks this directly, saying that he wants to help grow the game without being called out as ‘woke’.

As it turns out, the answer is simple; watch women’s games, share results and commentary on social media, and turn up for matches. We don’t all need to be shouting from the rooftops with a megaphone (although if you need someone to do this, Victoria Rush will gladly volunteer!)

No Woman No Try is released on Amazon Prime on 25 March 2022.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 36 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"fl's idea, if I can speak for him to speed things up, was for it to be semifinalists first, Champions Cup (any that somehow didn't make a league semi), then Challenge's semi finalists (which would most certainly have been outside their league semi's you'd think), then perhaps the quarter finalists of each in the same manner. I don't think he was suggesting whoever next performed best in Europe but didn't make those knockouts (like those round of 16 losers), I doubt that would ever happen."


That's not quite my idea.

For a 20 team champions cup I'd have 4 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 4 from the previous years challenge cup. For a 16 team champions cup I'd have 3 teams qualify from the previous years champions cup, and 1 from the previous years challenge cup.


"The problem I mainly saw with his idea (much the same as you see, that league finish is a better indicator) is that you could have one of the best candidates lose in the quarters to the eventual champions, and so miss out for someone who got an easier ride, and also finished lower in the league, perhaps in their own league, and who you beat everytime."

If teams get a tough draw in the challenge cup quarters, they should have won more pool games and so got better seeding. My system is less about finding the best teams, and more about finding the teams who perform at the highest level in european competition.

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Would I'd be think"

Would I'd be think.


"Well that's one starting point for an error in your reasoning. Do you think that in regards to who should have a say in how it's setup in the future as well? Ie you would care what they think or what might be more fair for their teams (not saying your model doesn't allow them a chance)?"

Did you even read what you're replying to? I wasn't arguing for excluding south africa, I was pointing out that the idea of quantifying someone's fractional share of european rugby is entirely nonsensical. You're the one who was trying to do that.


"Yes, I was thinking about an automatic qualifier for a tier 2 side"

What proportion of european rugby are they though? Got to make sure those fractions match up! 😂


"Ultimately what I think would be better for t2 leagues would be a third comp underneath the top two tournemnts where they play a fair chunk of games, like double those two. So half a dozen euro teams along with the 2 SA and bottom bunch of premiership and top14, some Championship and div 2 sides thrown in."

I don't know if Championship sides want to be commuting to Georgia every other week.


"my thought was just to create a middle ground now which can sustain it until that time has come, were I thought yours is more likely to result in the constant change/manipulation it has been victim to"

a middle ground between the current system and a much worse system?

57 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Huh? You mean last in their (4 team) pools/regions? My idea was 6/5/4, 6 the max, for guarenteed spots, with a 20 team comp max, so upto 5 WCs (which you'd make/or would be theoretically impossible to go to one league (they'd likely be solely for its participants, say 'Wales', rather than URC specifically. Preferrably). I gave 3 WC ideas for a 18 team comp, so the max URC could have (with a member union or club/team, winning all of the 6N, and Champions and Challenge Cup) would be 9."


That's a lot of words to say that I was right. If (e.g.) Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.


"And the reason say another URC (for example) member would get the spot over the other team that won the Challenge Cup, would be because they were arguable better if they finished higher in the League."

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.


"It won't diminish desire to win the Challenge Cup, because that team may still be competing for that seed, and if theyre automatic qual anyway, it still might make them treat it more seriously"

This doesn't make sense. Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't. Under my system, teams will "compete for the seed" by winning the Challenge Cup, under yours they won't. If a team is automatically qualified anyway why on earth would that make them treat it more seriously?


"I'm promoting the idea of a scheme that never needs to be changed again"

So am I. I'm suggesting that places could be allocated according to a UEFA style points sytem, or according to a system where each league gets 1/4 of the spots, and the remaining 1/4 go to the best performing teams from the previous season in european competition.


"Yours will promote outcry as soon as England (or any other participant) fluctates. Were as it's hard to argue about a the basis of an equal share."

Currently there is an equal share, and you are arguing against it. My system would give each side the opportunity to achieve an equal share, but with more places given to sides and leagues that perform well. This wouldn't promote outcry, it would promote teams to take european competition more seriously. Teams that lose out because they did poorly the previous year wouldn't have any grounds to complain, they would be incentivised to try harder this time around.


"This new system should not be based on the assumption of last years results/performances continuing."

That's not the assumption I'm making. I don't think the teams that perform better should be given places in the competition because they will be the best performing teams next year, but because sport should be based on merit, and teams should be rewarded for performing well.


"I'm specifically promoting my idea because I think it will do exactly what you want, increase european rugyb's importance."

how?


"I won't say I've done anything compressive"

Compressive.

57 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ ‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’ ‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’
Search