Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Progression does not mean experience needs to be thrown out the window

(Photo by Getty Images)

There is this trend to muster out the more senior members of the rugby community because they are regarded as ‘superfluous’.

ADVERTISEMENT

The often desperate need for change sometimes overlooks the true value experience can bring.

You will often hear the claim: ‘Your time is up, old codger, it is now our turn.’

Now I am all for ameliorating and fine-tuning to have a better product.

But just because a suggestion comes from a ‘graybeard’, it doesn’t mean his ideas are dated or out of sync with modern trends or needs.

Video Spacer

Andy Rowe turned quizmaster this week as he put Big Jim and Goodey’s knowledge to the test in another quarantine quiz.

Video Spacer

Andy Rowe turned quizmaster this week as he put Big Jim and Goodey’s knowledge to the test in another quarantine quiz.

We experience it in all aspects of everyday life, but more so in the need for revitalization in the rugby industry.

It was played up again this week when respected Springbok and mahatma Dawie Snyman penned a perspicacious and enlightening column for Rugby365.

As usual, there were those applauding and being appreciative of some of his bodacious suggestions – including ‘yellow cards’ for match officials.

And, on the flip side of the coin, there were those who dismissed his contribution as the ramblings of an out-of-touch oddball.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, in a subsequent discussion with Dawie Snyman, it became very apparent that most of the criticism levelled at his suggestions were the result of subjective critique by people who made no attempt to understand or explore the background of his proposals.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B_WXwLWA7B8/

Let me illustrate.

I love nothing more than to sit down for a chat with my colleague Paul Dobson – a decorated and well-respected writer, a man with 50 years of experience in refereeing and rugby.

I learn more from listening to Paul, because of his vast knowledge and background. Because of his wisdom and experiences, I become wiser and more informed.

As they say, listening is learning.

It was a similarly enlightening experience when Dawie Snyman put some context to his suggestions this week.

ADVERTISEMENT

I was well aware of Dawie’s achievements as a player. Those are well documented.

However, his proposals were not the works of a disgruntled former player. He is still very much involved with the mentoring of present coaches, at various levels.

They were the conception of a seasoned and forethoughtful visionary with heaps of very useful experience in the administration of the game – a person willing to share his contemplations and ideas.

Given that Dawie Snyman served in the administration of the game since the mid-1970s – first at Stellenbosch University and later also at the Western Province Rugby Football Union – he has a lot of insight that could be tapped into.

I am not, for one minute, suggesting he should be hauled back onto some or other executive committee.

However, sitting down and listening to ‘experienced’ former administrators like this could not hurt, especially in relation to the ethical side of the game.

This is the primary factor that should guide the game through time.

We are often far too quick to dismiss people because they are ‘old’.

Let’s not forget that Stellenbosch is the biggest ‘club’ in the world – with 1,300 players in its heyday – functioning much like a province or franchise today, with all the various committees and sub-committees.

Making an organisation like that function successfully takes some doing.

Then there is the ‘innovation’ of two referees on the field, which to this day still functions successfully in the Stellenbosch hostel leagues.

So why could it not work elsewhere?

Perhaps, just perhaps, it is – as Dawie said – the attitude adaptation of the vision of those running the game at present.

As that well-documented proverb goes: ‘Where there’s a will there’s a way.’

Maybe if the attitude of players, coaches and referees change, we may not need radical changes to save the game from ruin.

With that in mind, go read Dawie Snyman’s suggestions again.

With the right behaviour and demeanour perhaps the number of disciplinary hearings will decline – just as they did at Stellenbosch University when attitudes and circumstances changed.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 9 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Smith generally isn't well connected to his forward pods; doesn't do a great job of distributing to those around him; and has inferior positional and contestable kicking games than Ford and Fin.


When England have had success over the past few years, its been either through (i) defensive rugby backed up with smart tactical kicking or (ii) high possession attacking phase play based on quick ruck ball. George Ford was key to the implementation of (i) in the RWC, and in the 6N win over Wales, and to the implementation of (ii) in the 6N games against Ireland and France. Smith did great at (ii) when running at tired defenders at the end of the Ireland match, but has never successfully implemented that gameplan from the start of a test because he doesn't distribute or support his forwards enough to create consistent fast ball and build attacks over multiple phases. Instead, his introduction to the starting side has resulted in much more playmaking responsibilities being forced onto whoever plays 9. Alex Mitchell copes ok with that, but I think he looks better with a more involved playmaking 10 outside him, and it really isn't a gameplan that works for JVP or Spencer. As a result of that the outside backs and centres have barely touched the ball when Smith has been at 10.


This might not have been too much of a disaster, as England have seemed to be moving slightly towards the sort of attacking gameplan that France played under Labit and Quins play (I think this was especially their approach when they won the league a few years ago - but its still a part of their play now), which is based on kicking to create broken field rugby. This is (i) a sharp departure from the gameplans that have worked for England in the past few seasons; (ii) bears very little relation to the tactical approaches of the non-Quins players in the England team; and (iii) is an absolute disaster for the blitz defence, which is weak in transition. Unsurprisingly, it has coincided with a sharp decline in England's results.

68 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'They don't give a damn': SBW on the Wallabies during the 'aura' years for All Blacks SBW on the Wallabies mentality
Search