Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

‘Bunch of psychos’: Aussie weighs in on possible nickname for sevens ‘sisterhood’

Madison Ashby of Australia runs the ball during the 2024 Perth SVNS women's Cup Semi Final match between Australia and USA at HBF Park on January 28, 2024 in Perth, Australia. (Photo by Paul Kane/Getty Images)

The Matildas, Jillaroos and Australian Diamonds are all iconic names that represent the rapidly growing popularity of women’s sports in the Land Down Under. They’re icons of Aussie sport.

ADVERTISEMENT

But the Australian women’s sevens team are an anomaly of sorts. Just like their countrymen in the same sport, they are not known by anything beyond that drawn-out phrase.

The opportunity to play for Australia is a lifelong dream for all athletes who call this country home, and that should by no means be omitted. But there’s merit in a nickname.

Related

Video Spacer

Madison Ashby after Australia’s win set up a quarter-final with New Zealand | Perth SVNS

Video Spacer

Madison Ashby after Australia’s win set up a quarter-final with New Zealand | Perth SVNS

Whether it’s to promote a sense of popularity, possibly patriotism or familiarity, these names allow all supporters to identify with something more than just ‘Australia’.

Arch-rivals New Zealand are known as the Black Ferns Sevens – an expansion of the Black Ferns moniker for the 15s side – so the Aussie could rightly go by the Wallaroos Sevens.

As the team that sits atop the women’s SVNS Series standings, and with their 2016 Olympic triumph still inspiring young girls today, a team name could propel this team to the top of Australian sporting fandom along with the Matildas and the Australian cricket team.

Australian sevens star Madison Ashby, who was once identified as a 13-year-old hopeful for the 2016 Olympics in Rio, has weighed in on the debate with a couple of ideas.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Psychos, nah,” Ashby told RugbyPass while laughing. “We are a bunch of psychos but I’m not sure yet, that’s a team discussion, we’re a sisterhood.

“If we want to be known by anything it’s family. We’re very family-orientated.

“We just celebrated my birthday on Tuesday and cause my family couldn’t make it, my team made me feel very homey – surprised me with dinner, lots of presents.

“Definitely family.”

If you were there at Perth’s HBF Park last weekend, you know how much this team means to rugby fans in Australia. The crowd was loud, crowd and passionate as they cheered on the golden girls.

Australia reached their third final in as many tournaments this season after recovering from a shock pool stage defeat to Great Britain.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rising star Teagan Levi was sent off during that match, and older sister Maddison also saw red less than 24 hours later in the thrilling quarter-final win over New Zealand.

But after making the final, the Aussies fell short of expectations after falling to the fighting Irish 19-14. But still, the women in gold still sit atop of the overall series standings after winning Cup finals in Dubai and Cape Town in December.

Related

“Losing at home always hurts,” captain Charlotte Caslick told reporters on Sunday evening.

“I think the emotional toll and the lack of discipline really let us down. Regardless of the result, we know we have a lot to work on.”

The Australian women’s sevens side will look to bounce back when they take the field at SVNS Vancouver in February.

SVNS Vancouver gets underway on February 23 to 25. Those interested in watching some of the world’s best rugby while enjoying the best party in town can get tickets HERE.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 59 minutes ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Set pieces are important and the way teams use them is a great indication of how they play the game. No team is showcasing their revolution more than the Springboks. This year they have mauled less and primarily in the attacking third. Otherwise they have tended to set like they are going to maul and then play around the corner or shove the ball out the back. They arent also hitting the crash ball carrier constantly but instead they are choosing to use their width or a big carrying forward in wider areas. While their maul is varied the scrum is still a blunt instrument winning penalties before the backs have a go. Some teams have chosen to blunt their set piece game for more control. The All Blacks are kicking more penalties and are using their powerful scrum as an attacking tool choosing that set piece as an attacking weapon. Their willingness to maul more and in different positions is also becoming more prominent. The French continue to play conservative rugby off the set piece using their big bruisers frequently. The set piece is used differently by different teams. Different teams play different ways and can be successful regardless. They can win games with little territory and possession or smash teams with plenty of both. The game of rugby is for all types and sizes and thats true in the modern era. I hope that administrators keep it that way and dont go further towards a Rugby League style situation. Some administrators are of the opinion that rugby is too slow and needs to be sped up. Why not rather empower teams to choose how they want to play and create a framework that favours neither size nor agility. That favours neither slow tempo play or rock n roll rugby. Create a game that favour both and challenge teams to execute their plans. If World Rugby can create a game like that then it will be the ultimate winner.

34 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
'Let's not sugarcoat it': Former All Black's urgent call to protect eligibility rules

Yep, no one knows what will happen. Thing is I think (this is me arguing a point here not a random debate with this one) they're better off trialing it now in a controlled environment than waiting to open it up in a knee jerk style reaction to a crumbling organtization and team. They can always stop it again.


The principle idea is that why would players leave just because the door is ajar?


BBBR decides to go but is not good enough to retain the jersey after doing it. NZ no longer need to do what I suggest by paying him to get back upto speed. That is solely a concept of a body that needs to do what I call pick and stick wth players. NZR can't hold onto everyone so they have to choose their BBBRs and if that player comes back from a sabbatical under par it's a priority to get him upto speed as fast as possible because half of his competition has been let go overseas because they can't hold onto them all. Changing eligibility removes that dilemma, if a BBBR isn't playing well you can be assured that someone else is (well the idea is that you can be more assured than if you only selected from domestic players).


So if someone decides they want to go overseas, they better do it with an org than is going to help improve them, otherwise theyre still basically as ineligible as if they would have been scorning a NZ Super side that would have given them the best chance to be an All Black.

147 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'One of the deadliest wingers in rugby' has decided his future 'One of the deadliest wingers in rugby' has decided his future
Search