Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Pumas player ratings vs All Blacks | Rugby Championship

Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images

An untidy test match in pristine Christchurch conditions wrapped up with the visiting Argentinians securing their first ever victory on New Zealand soil, as well as reaffirming their position atop the Rugby Championship leaderboard.

ADVERTISEMENT

The hero of the day was undeniably the Pumas’ defence. Their accuracy was matched only by their physicality as they made executing a rapid line-speed against the All Blacks look like a practice drill. The All Blacks were persistent in their phase play and made some progress down the field but it was the Pumas who looked the more composed team, rolling with the punches until an inevitable All Blacks mistake.

Argentina entered this game with the best set-piece statistics in the Rugby Championship but that was the one area where – at least for the majority of the match – NZ had the advantage. The scrum and the lineout were both huge strengths for the All Blacks, a positive sign for new forwards coach Jason Ryan.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Unfortunately for the All Blacks, their discipline did not compliment their set piece, giving Emiliano Boffelli plenty of opportunity off the tee. The winger took every opportunity given to him, ending the game six from six on penalties and one from one on conversions. Those points accumulated alongside a single try to Juan Martin Gonzalez Samso was enough to secure a 25 – 18 victory.

How the triumphant Pumas rate?:

1. Thomas Gallo – 4/10
The Argentinian scrum was well and truely demolished, to the extent rarely seen between tier one nations. Showed good mobility and efficiency around the breakdown.

2. Julian Montoya – 6.5
Was a strong leader and put in a big shift, but was also at the centre of a troublesome scrum, a shaky line out and a retreating rolling maul. Made a lot of tackles.

3: Joel Sclavi – 4
Ethan de Groot was all over him at scrum time. Gave away the penalty which lead to the All Blacks first try.

ADVERTISEMENT

4. Matias Alemanno – 6.5
Showed up all over the place on defence, including an impressive desperation tackle on Richie Mo’unga.

5. Tomas Lavanini – 7.5
Contributed physicality and experience. Stayed out of trouble.

Related

6. Juan Martin Gonzalez Samso – 8
When the commentary team mistakenly calls you Pablo Matera, it’s safe to say you’re making good plays. Has a natural knack for being in the right place at the right time, reflective of his effort around the park.

7. Marcos Kremer – 9
Was the only player on the field who won every physical encounter he was involved in. Not just dominant and consistent, but timely. Was given the Ardie Savea assignment and did as well as anyone could; he had the All Blacks No 8 wrapped up the second he caught the ball throughout the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

8. Pablo Matera – 8.5
Running, tackling, passing, kicking… This man is a threat in every facet of the game.

9. Gonzalo Bertranou – 7.5
Argentina’s game management was sublime, playing on top of the All Blacks in short bursts and wasting no time when front-foot ball was disrupted.

10. Santiago Carreras – 8.5
Incredible kicking throughout the match, getting maximum meters with every penalty and controlling the territorial game well.

11. Lucio Cinti – 6
Chased well, had limited opportunities. Contributed well to removing Will Jordan’s impact from the game.

12. Matias Orlando – 6
Was outmuscled consistently on both sides of the ball. Showed plenty of fight and work rate but was on the wrong side of momentous plays. Used his speed well to get in the way of the All Blacks’ backline play and force the first receiver to take the tackle when they were looking to spread the ball wider.

13. Matias Moroni – 7
Operates well within David Kidwell’s defence, playing just outside more physical defenders and contributing to the tackle but quickly returning to the defensive line. Was also exposed physically at times.

14. Emiliano Boffelli – 8.5
Converted all seven of his kicks from the tee, applying scoreboard pressure. His effort in contesting the kick-off led to Gonzalez’s try, stopping any momentum the All Blacks were hoping to build off their own try moments earlier.

Related

15. Juan Cruz Mallia – 6.5
Had a few kicks that were beyond his chasers, yet not as territorially advantageous as he perhaps would have liked. Carreras seemed to manage most of the backfield play.

Reserves:

16. Santiago Socino – N/A
Played well in all of his 60 seconds on the park.

17. Marco Vivas – N/A
Went charging into tackles fearlessly, going very low.

18. Eduardo Bello – N/A
Michael Cheika was looking for some scrum stability off the bench, he did not get it.

19. Guido Petti – 7
Timely line out steal. Was strong in his tackles, often holding players up for long enough to stunt momentum and give his team time to set their defence.

20. Santiago Grondona – N/A
The replacement forwards did bring some success with the rolling maul off the line out.

21. Tomas Cubelli – 7.5
Was a real turnover threat when he came on. Managed to get the ball out of the scrum quick enough.

22. Thomas Albornoz – N/A

23. Santiago Condero – N/A

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
C
Chris 848 days ago

I must say I’m impressed at how Michael Cheika has matured as a coach. His passion clearly resonates with this team. I think they will be a surprise package at the RWC.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 1 hour ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

1 Go to comments
J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
J
JW 11 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

207 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search