Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Queensland Maroons player ratings vs NSW | State of Origin II

(Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

Billy Slater’s Queensland side headed to Perth looking to seal the series after their Game I victory in Sydney.

ADVERTISEMENT

Two big plays from Kalyn Ponga leading to Queensland tries looked to have laid the platform for the Maroons night but the Blues were able to strike back each time to take a 14-12 halftime lead.

In the second half it was all New South Wales as the Blues rolled to a massive 44-12 victory at Optus Stadium in Perth.

Here’s how the Queensland players rated in Game II of State of Origin:

1 Kalyn Ponga – 8

One of Queensland’s best, brilliant in attack as a delightful pass created the opening try and his speed made the Maroons’ second, but he lacked helpers as NSW rolled through a lacklustre defence.

2 Selwyn Cobbo – 2

It was the roughest of nights for the young winger, making four errors including bouncing a grubberkick where he easily could have scored a try in the first half.

3 Valentine Holmes – 4

On hand for Munster’s try with a nice assist but it was an otherwise muted night, missing five tackles while only completing seven.

4 Dane Gagai – 3

ADVERTISEMENT

Reasonably invisible display in attack, only producing 35m and lacking any flashy moments.

5 Murray Taulagi – 4.5

Quiet first half and dropped a high ball early in the second stanza, although he did churn out 94m with the ball.

6 Cameron Munster – 4

Was on the scene to capitalise on a Ponga line break with a try, but just couldn’t create his usual magic and came up with three errors.

7 Daly Cherry-Evans – 5

Had some moments and did what he could via foot with 427m kicking, but lacked the required punch to lead his side back into the contest.

ADVERTISEMENT

8 Lindsay Collins – 4.5

Got through a tonne of defensive work with 30 tackles while he only missed two, but only made seven runs after missing some time with a head injury assessment.

Related

9 Ben Hunt – 4

Solid early in laying the foundation for Harry Grant’s entrance off the bench, although really did little more than that.

10 Josh Papalii – 4

Made three runs for 25m in a 17-minute stint to start the game and then sat on the bench for nearly the next hour before returning for the last few minutes.

11 Kurt Capewell – 3

Five runs for 27 minutes is all he had to show for the night, as one of a number of quiet Maroons.

12 Felise Kaufusi – 5

Opened the scoring with a bustling run that saw him beat two defenders, but did 10 minutes in the sin bin for a cynical hold close to his own line and NSW immediately scored in his absence.

13 Tino Fa’asuamaleaui – 3.5

Started well with the sort of bruising runs you’d expect from him, but disappeared as the Blues took over.

14 Harry Grant – 3

Entered on 23 minutes but couldn’t exert his influence like he did in Game One and missed six missed tackles.

15 Jai Arrow – 3.5

Went off soon after entering the fray for a head injury assessment and only had five runs for the game.

16 Patrick Carrigan – 7

Came off the bench to again give the Maroons a huge energy boost, not putting a foot wrong and making 33 tackles.

17 Jeremiah Nanai – 2.5

Didn’t enter until the second half and barely featured when he did, aside from missing four tackles.

-Alex Mitchell/AAP

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 2 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

1 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
J
JW 12 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I had a look at the wiki article again, it's all terribly old data (not that I'd see reason for much change in the case of SA).

Number Of Clubs:

1526

Registered+Unregistered Players:

651146

Number of Referees:

3460

Pre-teen Male Players:

320842

Pre-teen Female Player:

4522

Teen Male Player:

199213

Teen Female Player:

4906

Senior Male Player:

113174

Senior Female Player:

8489

Total Male Player:

633229

Total Female Player:

17917


So looking for something new as were more concerned with adults specifically, so I had a look at their EOY Financial Review.

The total number of clubs remains consistent, with a marginal increase of 1% from 1,161 to 1,167. 8.1.

A comparative analysis of verified data for 2022 and 2023 highlights a marginal decline of 1% in the number of female players, declining from 6,801 to 6,723. Additionally, the total number of players demonstrates an 8% decrease, dropping from 96,172 to 88,828.

So 80k+ adult males (down from 113k), but I'm not really sure when youth are involved with SAn clubs, or if that data is for some reason not being referenced/included. 300k male students however (200k in old wiki data).


https://resources.world.rugby/worldrugby/document/2020/07/28/212ed9cf-cd61-4fa3-b9d4-9f0d5fb61116/P56-57-Participation-Map_v3.pdf has France at 250k registered but https://presse-europe1-fr.translate.goog/exclu-europe-1-le-top-10-des-sports-les-plus-pratiques-en-france-en-2022/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=wapp has them back up at 300k registered.


The French number likely Students + Club, but everyone collects data different I reckon. In that WR pdf for instance a lot of the major nations have a heavily registered setup, were as a nation like England can penetrate into a lot more schools to run camps and include them in the reach of rugby. For instance the SARU release says only 29% of schools are reached by proper rugby programs, where as the 2million English number would be through a much much higer penetration I'd imagine. Which is thanks to schools having the ability to involve themselves in programs more than anything.


In any case, I don't think you need to be concerned with the numbers, whether they are 300 or 88k, there is obviously a big enough following for their pro scenes already to have enough quality players for a 10/12 team competition. They appear ibgger than France but I don't really by the lower English numbers going around.

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING ‘It’s about his career’: Why NRL star Payne Haas could jump codes ‘It’s about his career’: Why NRL star Payne Haas could jump codes
Search