Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Quickest red cards in rugby union history

(Photo by Brendan Moran/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

With the game of rugby generating stronger and faster athletes every year, the game has had to adapt with stronger measures to ensure that player safety is put at the forefront. What this means is that we are seeing more and more sanctions and sending-offs than ever before.

ADVERTISEMENT

When a player gets sent off it gives a clear advantage to the opposing team because it opens up space where it would not have been before. We are currently looking at a quicker game now than ever seen in the past, which means that with a player advantage that extra little bit of space can make all the difference.

If you look back at games from many years ago, you will see plenty of tackles that in today’s game simply would not be allowed. For example, it would not have been unheard of for players to stamp on the opposition in a ruck or figuratively take a player’s head off in a spine-tingling tackle and face no repercussions.

In today’s game, we hear the word ‘mitigation’ a lot, which can be the difference between a caution, a yellow card, and a red card. Mitigation is essentially working out if the resulting punishment can be reduced based on the circumstances that lead to the illegal act. For example, if a player were to connect around the neck during a tackle, the mitigation would be how intentional it was and what level of danger was determined.

Yellow cards are a lot more common than red cards since players are now better trained and instructed to keep to the letter of the law. A high tackle for example may be mitigated down to a yellow card if the tackled player was slipping during contact, or if the offending player showed no high level of danger within the tackle.

A red card however is distributed when a high level of danger is seen by the officials, with no other mitigating factors being present.
A red card can be damning for the affected side at any stage of the match, although, the earlier on in the game it is, the longer the handicap has to take effect. Take a look at the quickest-ever red cards in rugby union history.

Marika Korembeti – 4 minutes 27 seconds

After France had taken an early lead against Australia, Marika Korembeti decided to put in a statement hit on the opposition. Unfortunately for Kormembeti, his hit was misplaced as it was deemed that his shoulder made clear contact with the head of the opposition player.
Due to the high level of danger from Korembeti, as he charged from a distance and was always rising in the tackle, it was determined that there was no mitigation so a straight red card was given.

Jared Payne – 4 minutes 8 seconds

Jared Payne was chasing a high ball, attempting to get underneath it as he collided with the opposition player. Despite his captain insisting that he had his eyes on the ball, the referee made the decision to give a red card because of the high level of danger and the lack of care provided.

Charlie Ewels – 1 minute 22 seconds

A different challenge but the same outcome for Charlie Ewels on this occasion. A head-on-head collision saw no mitigating circumstances, causing the England player to leave the field just beyond the first minute.
Ireland went on to become deserved winners in this game, as they took advantage of England’s tired legs during the last quarter of the game.

Nick wood – 1 minute 12 seconds

The previous red cards could all be argued in part to be ‘accidental’ in nature, on this occasion however there was no excuse for Nick Wood in this reckless act. Even die-hard Gloucester fans would be hard-pressed to defend Wood’s actions as he stamped on the head of the Saracens player within the first minute.

Dan Evans – 37 seconds

One of the most bizarre red cards you are ever likely to see, Dan Evans catches the ball and raises his leg to protect himself in typical fullback fashion. What is out of the ordinary however is the extension of his leg, which causes his boot to fly into Teddy Thomas’s face. Evans saw red as his actions were determined to be ‘reckless’, in the quickest sending-off in rugby history.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 59 minutes ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

on the article "Why defensive aggressor Felix Jones will drive new-look England" I said:


"Look at the kick:pass ratio from England’s games under Borthwick:

Italy 20:100

Argentina 50:100

South Africa 53:100

Fiji 24:100

Samoa 22:100

Chile 12:100

Japan 25:100

Argentina 55:100

Fiji 30:100

Ireland 21:100

Wales 24:100

Wales 13:100

Ireland 26:100

France 22:100

Wales 26:100

Italy 23:100

Scotland 18:100

The average is 27:100

The average in games we have won is 28:100

The average in games we have lost is 26:100, but these averages are skewed by the fact that we have tended to kick less and pass more against worse sides

The average in games where we have beaten current top 10 sides is 35:100

The average in games where we have beaten current top 8 sides is 39:100

The average in games where we have beaten current top 7 sides is 53:100

The average in games where we have lost to teams currently ranked lower than us is 20:100"


on the article "Four talking points after England's narrowest-ever win over Italy" I said:


"Look at the kick:pass ratio from England’s last 8 games

Italy 20:100

Argentina 50:100

South Africa 53:100

Fiji 24:100

Samoa 22:100

Chile 12:100

Japan 25:100

Argentina 55:100

So (1) England spread it wide more yesterday than against anyone bar Chile, and (2) all of england’s best performances have been when we kick loads, and in every match where we kick loads we have had a good performance."


"In particular you're neglecting the impact of the type of D Felix Jones was trying to introduce, which demanded most of England's training energy at the time."


I'm not, actually, I'm hyper aware of that fact and of its impact. I think it is because of the defence that England's new attack faltered so much for the first three games, something you ignore when you try to judge England's attack in the six nations by taking an average of either the trys scored or the rucks completed over the whole tournament.


"International coaches don't just pick those styles like sweets from a sweet shop!"

Yeah, I know. England's defence wasn't exactly the same as SA's, but it was similar. England's attack did rely on turnovers more than the Irish system did, but it was still pretty similar to it, and then shifted to something similar-but-not-identitcal to the Labit/Nick Evans systems, which are themselves similar but not identical.

102 Go to comments
f
fl 2 hours ago
The Fergus Burke test and rugby's free market

"So who were these 6 teams and circumstances of Marcus's loses?"


so in the 2023 six nations, England lost both games where Marcus started at 10, which was the games against Scotland and France. The scotland game was poor, but spirited, and the french game was maybe the worst math england have played in almost 30 years. In all 3 games where Marcus didn't start England were pretty good.


The next game he started after that was the loss against Wales in the RWC warmups, which is one of only three games Borthwick has lost against teams currently ranked lower than england.


The next game he's started have been the last 7, so that's two wins against Japan, three losses against NZ, a loss to SA, and a loss to Australia (again, one of borthwicks only losses to teams ranked lower than england).


"I think I understand were you're coming from, and you make a good observation that the 10 has a fair bit to do with how fast a side can play (though what you said was a 'Marcus neutral' statement)"


no, it wasn't a marcus neutral statement.


"Fin could be, but as you've said with Marcus, that would require a lot of change elsewhere in the team 2 years out of a WC"


how? what? why? Fin could slot in easily; its Marcus who requires the team to change around him.


"Marcus will get a 6N to prove himself so to speak"


yes, the 2022 six nations, which was a disaster, just as its been a disaster every other time he's been given the reigns.

224 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ The future of rugby: Sale and Leinster mount the case for the defence The future of rugby: Sale and Leinster mount the case for the defence
Search