Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

RA chairman and CEO seemingly at odds over Giteau Law changes

Samu Kerevi of the Wallabies looks on after losing the Bledisloe Cup decider. (Photo by Anthony Au-Yeung/Getty Images)

While it was reported last week that Rugby Australia chief executive Andy Marinos was in favour of expanding the Giteau Law to allow the Wallabies to pick a greater number of overseas players, chairman Hamish McLennan has doused speculation that the change could see a huge influx of foreign-based players to the test side.

ADVERTISEMENT

“When you look at the pool of talent from which we are selecting in comparison to our biggest rivals; be it New Zealand, be it South Africa, be it Argentina, be it England – they have access and the ability to choose their very best players no matter where they’re playing,” Marinos told the Sydney Morning Herald.

“We do need to look into eligibility. I’m not saying it’s going to be alpha and omega. But it will certainly bring a lot more experience and a lot more depth across the board.”

Video Spacer

North American rugby is on the up.

Video Spacer

North American rugby is on the up.

Currently, the Wallabies are able to select two players who are based overseas who have already clocked up 60 tests for the side. They are also able to bring in two additional foreign-based players, regardless of their number of caps.

In the current squad for the Rugby Championship, midfielders Duncan Paia’aua and Samu Kerevi are the two additional players, while 70-cap flyhalf Quade Cooper was also a late addition to the team but qualifies for selection under the Giteau Law.

Marinos’ comments suggested that RA could be looking to open the gates for any foreign-based players to represent the Wallabies but chairman McLennan has ruled that out.

Speaking on Stan Sports’ Rugby Heaven show, McLennan said that RA didn’t want to open the floodgates, allowing for local players to head offshore en masse.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We’re not heading to open slather,” he said. “We’re just looking at how we can tweak and refine the current Giteau Law as it stands.

“Eligibility is really around are there one or two players out there that we can bring in and/or see how we can improve the player squad for a World Cup tournament.

“So we’re not going to move to the South African model at all. But like all things, it’s open to debate and we’re turning over every stone at Rugby Australia and have done for the past year. So the time is now for us to look at it.”

Of course, the current rules already allow for ‘one or two players’ to join the Wallabies – which begs the question of what exactly RA are hoping to accomplish with any changes.

ADVERTISEMENT

McLennan affirmed that the impact on Super Rugby would be seriously considered before any adjustments to the eligibility rules were made.

“We do think that at some point in the next couple of weeks we’ll get that tournament finalised so we want to have a good local culture and stop our teams losing great players overseas en masse.

“I mean I’m a free marketeer by trade and if people do want to go overseas, whether it be to France or Japan or UK then so be it. But I think for us and our model and what we’re trying to achieve, we want to keep as many of the good players here locally playing in Super Rugby… If you look at the local competition in South Africa it’s been decimated so we don’t want to move to that model whatsoever.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?

Also a Bristol fan and echo your sentiments.


I love watching Bristol but their approach will only get them so far I think. Exeter played like this when they first got promoted to the prem and had intermittent success, it wasn't until they wised up and played a more balanced game that they became a consistently top side.


I really want Bristol to continue playing this brand of rugby and I don't mind them running it from under their posts but I don't think they need to do it every single time. They need to be just a little bit more selective about when and where on the pitch they play. Every game they put themselves under so much needless pressure by turning the ball over under their posts trying to do kamikaze moves when it's not required. By all means run it from your goal line if there is a chance for a counter attack, we all want to see Bristol running in 100m tries from under their posts but I think until they learn when to do it and when to be pragmatic, they are unlikely to win the premiership.


Defense has been a real positive from Bristol, they've shown a lot of improvement there... And I will say that I think this kamikaze strategy they employ is a very good one for a struggling side and could be employed by Newcastle. It's seems to have turned around Gloucester's fortunes. The big advantage is even if you don't have the biggest and best players, what you have is cohesion. This is why Scotland keep battering England. England have better individuals but they look muddled as a team, trying to play a mixed strategy under coaches who lack charisma, the team has no identity. Scotland come out and give it full throttle from 1-15 even if they struggle against the top sides, sides like England and Wales who lack that identity drown under the relentless will and synergy of the Scots. If Newcastle did the same they could really surprise some people, I know the weather is bad up there but it hasn't bothered the Scots. Bristol can learn from Scotland too, Pat is on to something when he says the following but Scotland don't play test matches like headless chickens. They still play with the same level of clarity and ambition Bristol do but they are much better at picking their moments. They needed to go back to this mad game to get their cohesion back after a couple of seasons struggling but I hope they get a bit wiser from matches like Leinster and La Rochelle.


“If there’s clarity on what you’re trying to do as a team you can win anything.”

2 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search