Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rachael Burford: 2021 is the year for women's rugby

New RugbyPass columnist, Rachael Burford (Getty Images)

2021 is set to be a monumental year for women’s rugby. We have the Women’s Six Nations in February, Sevens at the Olympics this summer, and then the biggest event of all: Rugby World Cup 2021. It’s a great time to start a column about women’s rugby, and I hope to bring my experience in both the grassroots and elite game to my biweekly articles. I have played elite rugby and premiership rugby for over ten years in England, and I now run Girls Rugby Club, an international pathway and platform to connect the 2.7 million girls who play rugby globally.

ADVERTISEMENT

I want to use this column to tackle the biggest issues in both grassroots and elite women’s rugby, and bring things to the attention of those who might not realise the dedication of the women and girls who play rugby, and the challenges they face on and off the pitch.

I started playing rugby when I was just six years old, and I have had an incredible career, including playing in four Rugby World Cups: 2006, 2010, 2014, and 2017, and two Sevens World Cups in 2009 and 2013.

Video Spacer

Full rugby doc: Going Pro – Saracens Women

Video Spacer

Full rugby doc: Going Pro – Saracens Women

I’ve played for England both before and after professional contracts were introduced. Professionalism started in 2014, when the women’s Sevens side received full-time contracts until 2016, in the run-up to the Rio Olympic Games. Then, the England Women’s 15s side was granted professional contracts for one year (between September 2016 and August 2017) in the run up to the 2017 Rugby World Cup. At this time, the Sevens players also had part-time contracts. Following the 2017 Rugby World Cup the 15s contracts ended, but the Sevens players got full-time contracts.

Then, in a landmark moment for women’s rugby, England Rugby granted 28 full-time contracts, and seven part-time contracts, to the England Women’s 15s squad in January 2019, while the Sevens players remained on their full-time contracts. For over ten years, I’ve been there for the highs and lows of elite women’s rugby in England, and I’m excited for what the next year holds.

As every year does, we start with the Women’s Six Nations tournament. There has been some speculation that the Women’s Six Nations won’t go ahead, but in my opinion it will, because there are Rugby World Cup qualifier games that need to take place for Ireland, Scotland and Italy. They might have to move the fixtures to April, but I’m in no doubt that they will go ahead somehow, as we want teams to play for the opportunity to compete at the Rugby World Cup, and not let it be decided by current rankings. It will be a really important tournament to build up momentum for women’s rugby at the start of this year, to grow the fanbase before the Rugby World Cup.

England will be aiming for a Grand Slam win of course, and if they win it will be their third in a row. But I doubt that’s even on the minds of the players. Instead, they will be thinking about each game as it comes, and trying to build on past performance. The Six Nations could be the last opportunity for each player to make their mark on the team, and put their hand up as someone who wants a place in the World Cup squad, if there are no friendlies before the Rugby World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

Every player will be aware of that and will want to give their absolute best performance. When I was on the lead up to Rugby World Cups, I would countdown each game I had left before the World Cup started, as I saw every second in games and training as an opportunity to prove I deserved a place in the team. The team will be aware that they have five games to play before the Rugby World Cup, and the excitement will build the closer they get to the tournament.

England have traditionally had a really strong balance of both experienced and young, fresh talent in the squad, but the scales are now turning more to the younger players. That might sound worrying for fans, but the England squad is definitely in good hands. Players like Zoe Harrison and Helena Rowland are both coming in at fly-half, and both are so young and talented. It’s scary how young they are, Zoe is 22 and Helena is just 21, yet both are stars to watch on the pitch. Helena has made her mark in 15s and Sevens, and may also play for Team GB at the Olympics this summer.

Katy Daley-McLean has just retired from her spot at fly-half, so there are big boots to fill for both Zoe and Helena, but I have no doubt they will rise to it. Are they there yet? Probably not, but if the younger players were smart, as I’m sure they were, they would have used every opportunity to learn from Katy. She is such a student of the game and she always wants to help people understand rugby the way she does.

I actually wonder whether England should employ Katy Daley-McLean as a mentor for the fly-halves coming through before the Rugby World Cup, as she has so much experience in that position. They’ve done it in the men’s game, Dylan Hartley has done some work with the hookers, and Jonny Wilkinson still works with the kickers. It would be great if Katy could come back and impart some of her wisdom on to the fly-halves coming through.

ADVERTISEMENT

The advantage that the younger girls have is that they are so fearless. They don’t know what it’s like to play at a Rugby World Cup, but that might actually work in their favour, because they are not fearful of facing opponents like New Zealand. When you prepare for a Rugby World Cup, you just have to focus on you and what you do best, which is the best way to be. In 2014 I think we really mastered that. The team went into a ‘bubble’, before ‘bubbles’ were even a thing! We limited the outside distractions we had to an absolute minimum, and just focused on our game and team. We had such unity and clarity in the squad: we were on a mission to win the Rugby World Cup and that’s exactly what we did. I remember at half time in the final against Canada, we all looked at each other, and I just felt this enormous sense of control. Anything they did, we knew exactly how to respond.

We won that game 21-9 and it was simply the best feeling ever. That culture we had developed of focus, determination and spirit translated into our game and we were focused until the final whistle. Then, we celebrated. All of our hard work and years of training had resulted in a Rugby World Cup winners medal. It felt magical!

In the 2017 final, we just let the game slip away from us. We had a hold of the game at first, and I remember watching Lydia Thompson score a try in the first half and feeling confident. It was such a high-scoring game, but eventually the whistle blew, and New Zealand celebrated a 41-32 win. We were utterly gutted. We had sacrificed so much to get there. We were on temporary full-time professional contracts that we knew would be up at the end of the tournament.

women's rugby
New Zealand Black Ferns celebrate their victory during the Women’s Rugby World Cup 2017 Final between England and New Zealand at the Kingspan Stadium in 2017 (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

Since then, women’s rugby has grown at an incredible pace. I’ve watched first-hand as the audiences for our games get bigger and bigger. Last Autumn, the England v France games on BBC Two reached a peak audience of 800,000. People have started to watch women’s rugby on mainstream, prime time television. The game is just getting bigger and bigger, and 2021 is going to be a really exciting year for the sport.

Before the Rugby World Cup, we have Sevens at The Olympic Games, which will be another great way to showcase women’s rugby. Sevens is a whole different world and everything about the game is a whirlwind. It’s a faster game with quick tries, which means that it is great for spectators. I can imagine young people watching it and rushing down to their local rugby club to sign up. The effects that having the Six Nations, the Women’s Six Nations, a Rugby World Cup and Sevens on television this year will be phenomenal for grassroots rugby – both boys and girls. That’s not to forget the British and Irish Lions tour either. On that note, I hope that one day soon, there will be a women’s British and Irish Lions tour. It would be a great advert for the women’s game!

This exciting year of rugby has come at the right time too, as grassroots players have dropped off since the coronavirus pandemic. All the women’s rugby on television this year will have a really positive impact on the grassroots game, I have no doubt. I always say: ‘if you can’t see it, you can’t believe it, you can’t be it.’ Young girls now have role models to look up to in women’s rugby, and the platform it will been given in 2021 is phenomenal. Whatever obstacles 2020 may have put in the way for women’s rugby, 2021 is here to surpass them all. It’s an exciting, jam-packed year of women’s rugby, and I can’t wait to write about it.

Check out the Girls Rugby Club website HERE.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 9 minutes ago
France outwrestle All Blacks in titanic Test for one-point win

Yeah nar I pretty much agree with that sentiment, wasn't just about the lineout though.


Yeah, I think it's the future of SR, even TRC. Graham above just now posting about how good a night it was with a dbl header of ENGvSA and NZvFrance, and now I don't want to kick SA or Argentina out of TRC but it would be great if in this next of the woods 2 more top teams could come in to create more of these sort of nights (for rugby's appeal). Often Arg and SA and both travel here and you get those games but more often doesn't work out right.


Obviously a long way off but USA and Japan are the obvious two. First thing we need to do is get Eddie Jones kicked out of Japan so they can start improving again and then get a couple of US teams in SRP (even if one its just a US based and augmented Jaguares).


It will start off the whole conferences are crap debate again (which I will continue to argue vehemently against), but imagine a 6 team Pacific conference, Tokyo Sunwolves (drafted from Tokyo JRLO teams), Tokyo All Stars (made up of best remaining foreign players and overseas drafts), ALL Nihon (best of local non Tokyo based talent, inc China/Korea etc, with mainland Japan), a could of West Coast american franchises and perhaps a second self PI driven Hawai'i based team, or Jagaures. So I see a short NFL like 3 or 4 month comp as fitting best, maybe not even a full round, NZvAUSvPAC, all games taking place within a 6hr window. Model for NZ will definitely still require a competitive and funded NPC!


On the Crusaders, I liked last years ending with Grace on the bench (ovbiously form dependent but thats how it ended) and Lio-Willie at 8. I could have Blackadder trying to be a 7 but think balance will be used with him at 6 and Kellow as 7. Scott Barrett is an international 6 sized player. It is just NZ style/model that pushes him into the tight, I reckon he'd be a great loose player, and saders have Strange and Cahill as bigger players (plus that change could draw someone like Darry back). Same with Haig now, hes not grown yet but Barrett hight and been playing 6, now that the Highlanders have only chosen two locks he'll be playing lock, and that is going to change his growth trajectory massively, rather than seeing him grow like an International 6.

59 Go to comments
T
Tom 26 minutes ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

Interesting post. I realise that try was down to Marcus Smith not Slade, this is why I mentioned that England's attack is completely reliant on Smith working miracles. Just wanted to highlight that Slade's little touch was classy and most English players would have cocked it up. Earl has gas, he's very athletic but Underhill is nailed on at 7 in my eyes though. They both need to be on the pitch so we need a tall 6 or 8 to complement them which we have in CCS and potentially Ollie Chessum. We also have young Henry Pollock who may be the 7 by the world cup.


The whole attack needs an overhaul but Richard Wigglesworth our attack coach was a very limited scrum half who excelled at box kicking and had no running game. Spent most of his career with Saracens who mauled, defended and set pieced their way to victory.... Which might have been ok if Felix Jones hadn't quit and been replaced by a guy who coaches Oyonnax who have one of the worst defences in the French 2nd division. I'm not too emotionally invested in England right now because this coaching setup isn't capable of winning anything.


England had no attack when they were winning under Eddie either. They battered teams with huge dominant tackles and won from pressure. The last time England had any creativity in attack was the Stuart Lancaster/Mike Catt era. They played some fantastic attacking rugby but results were mediocre, lots of 2nd place finishes in the 6N although it felt like we were building something special until we got brutally dumped out of our home world cup in the pool stage.

8 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
England player ratings vs South Africa | 2024 Autumn Nations Series

As has been the way all year, and for all England's play I can remember. I missed a lot of the better years under Eddie though.


Lets have a look at the LQB for the last few games... 41% under 3 sec compared to 56% last week, 47% in the game you felt England best in against NZ, and 56 against Ireland.


That was my impression as well. Dunno if that is a lack of good counterattack ball from the D, forward dominance (Post Contact Meters stats reversed yesterday compared to that fast Ireland game), or some Borthwick scheme, but I think that has been highlighted as Englands best point of difference this year with their attack, more particularly how they target using it in certain areas. So depending on how you look at it, not necessarily the individual players.


You seem to be falling into the same trap as NZs supporters when it comes to Damien McKenzie. That play you highlight Slade in wasn't one of those LQB situations from memory, that was all on the brilliance of Smith. Sure, Slade did his job in that situation, but Smith far exceeded his (though I understand it was a move Sleightholme was calling for). But yeah, it's not always going to be on a platter from your 10 and NZ have been missing that Slade line, in your example, more often than not too. When you go back to Furbank and Feyi-Waboso returns you'll have that threat again. Just need to generate that ball, wait for some of these next Gen forwards to come through etc, the props and injured 6 coming back to the bench. I don't think you can put Earl back to 7, unless he spends the next two years speeding up (which might be good for him because he's getting beat by speed like he's not used to not having his own speed to react anymore).

8 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: Rugby Australia face losing centre star Fissler Confidential: Wallabies facing losing centre star to France
Search