Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rassie Erasmus names his biggest achievement in rugby

(Photo by Michael Steele/World Rugby via Getty Images)

Rassie Erasmus has named his biggest achievement in rugby – and it isn’t winning the Rugby World Cup with South Africa. The South African director of rugby has had his autobiography, which was published just before the start of Rugby World Cup 2023, translated into English and it is now on the shelves in the UK and Ireland ahead of the traditional Christmas uptick in book sales.

ADVERTISEMENT

For sure, the 300-page-plus publication titled ‘Rassie – Stories of Life and Rugby’ is a breezy read, starting off with his upbringing in Despatch in the Eastern Cape and continuing right through until prior to the start of Rugby World Cup 2023, which the Springboks won in France to clinch back-to-back titles for the first time.

Despite all his achievements on the international stage as a player and coach, Erasmus stated in the book’s closing chapter that his biggest achievement in the game was the creation in South Africa a decade ago of the elite player development pathway which widened the net on the players that were scouted.

Video Spacer

RWC Final – New Zealand v South Africa

Watch highlights, reaction and more to the RWC Final at RugbyPass TV

Watch Free

Video Spacer

RWC Final – New Zealand v South Africa

Watch highlights, reaction and more to the RWC Final at RugbyPass TV

Watch Free

Reflecting on his career, Erasmus concluded: “My biggest achievement has been the creation of the EPD pathway. I get immense pleasure from watching young players, who might otherwise not have had opportunities, become Springboks and play in a World Cup final.

“I remember going to Border with Jacques (Nienaber) to help their coach in 2013 and we saw this young centre, Lukhanyo Am. I told Jacques we had to keep him on our radar. Six years later, he was winning the World Cup. Those are the moments that stay with me.

“I often get accused of being a political animal, doing the bidding of my political masters, because of the way I handled transformation and selected my Springbok teams. Let me be very clear – not once in my Springbok coaching career has anyone ever told me who to select based on political considerations.

“My selections have been my free choice, in consultation with my assistant coaches. I can almost hear people who want to believe I play political games shouting ‘Bulls***’ when they read this. I can’t change their minds.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I’ve tried, but I realise some people don’t want to know the facts. I’m being honest when I say I made Siya (Kolisi) captain and picked a group of young black players against England (in 2018), not because I had to make up quota numbers but because they were the right players for the job. And without question, they all proved themselves worthy of their selection.

“I did the groundwork to fix rugby all those years ago with the introduction of the EPD pathway. When it started producing fruit, I didn’t have to worry about transformation targets because the right players were ready for the big time.

“Transformation is not a matter of white player out, black player in. It’s about fair and equal opportunities, but first we had to create those opportunities.”

Erasmus added: “I take great pride in watching how rugby has changed from being supported by a minority of people in South Africa to a sport embraced by all its people. Rugby has shown how South Africans, no matter what race we are, what language we speak, or what background we come from, can all work together. We can beat countries more powerful and richer than ours if we stand together and use all our resources.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I look back on my rugby life, with its achievements and its mistakes, with a degree of satisfaction. I played in big Test matches and I coached in even bigger ones. I hope my lasting contribution is having provided opportunities to people who stepped up and took them. Anyone can play rugby if they are just given the chance.

“You can be a boy from Bishops in Cape Town, Grey College in Bloemfontein, or Paul Roos Gym in Stellenbosch. You can be a boy from Hoërskool Brackenfell near Kraaifontein, Jim Mvabaza Senior Secondary in King William’s Town (now Qonce), or Ntyatyambo Primary in Zwide. Or you can be a boy from Hoërskool Despatch in Despatch.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

71 Comments
J
Jon 402 days ago

Confirming Despatch is a shit-hole—congrats Rassie on getting out

B
Bob Marler 402 days ago

There’s a Kant in our midst. A big one. Massive one. What a Kant.

N
Nigel 402 days ago

No mention of his clown of the decade award for his cry baby social media bleats I take it.

N
Nigel 402 days ago

Good to see that World Rugby have admitted that Smith's try should have been allowed to stand (the knock on which occurred 4 phases before the try cannot be sanctioned in terms of their rules which allows officials to go back only two phases). In addition they admit that the officials got it wrong in not awarding NZ a penalty for de Klerk's refused to put the ball in a stable scrum. Any true SA rugby fan should be hanging their heads in embarrassment now.

P
Philou 402 days ago

Liam, please put in diacritics where necessary. It’s ‘Hoërskool’, not ‘Hoerskool’. The latter would translate as ‘prostitute school’. Sigh, it looks like more people need Afrikaans lessons.

N
Ninjin 402 days ago

Best coach in the world!

D
David 402 days ago

What a Champion! Sorry, Double Champion!!

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 4 hours ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Yep, that's exactly what I want.

Glasgow won the URC and Edinburgh finished 16th, but Scotland won the six nations, Edinburgh would qualify for the Champions Cup under your system.

It's 'or'. If Glasgow won the URC or Scotland won the six nations. If one of those happens I believe it will (or should) be because the league is in a strong place, and that if a Scotland side can do that, there next best club team should be allowed to reach for the same and that would better serve the advancement of the game.


Now, of course picking a two team league like Scotland is the extreme case of your argument, but I'm happy for you to make it. First, Edinbourgh are a good mid table team, so they are deserving, as my concept would have predicted, of the opportunity to show can step up. Second, you can't be making a serious case that Gloucester are better based on beating them, surely. You need to read Nicks latest article on SA for a current perspective on road teams in the EPCR. Christ, you can even follow Gloucester and look at the team they put out the following week to know that those games are meaningless.


More importantly, third. Glasgow are in a league/pool with Italy, So the next team to be given a spot in my technically imperfect concept would be Benneton. To be fair to my idea that's still in it's infancy, I haven't given any thought to those 'two team' leagues/countries yet, and I'm not about to 😋

They would be arguably worse if they didn't win the Challenge Cup.

Incorrect. You aren't obviously familiar with knockout football Finn, it's a 'one off' game. But in any case, that's not your argument. You're trying to suggest they're not better than the fourth ranked team in the Challenge Cup that hasn't already qualified in their own league, so that could be including quarter finalists. I have already given you an example of a team that is the first to get knocked out by the champions not getting a fair ranking to a team that loses to one of the worst of the semi final teams (for example).

Sharks are better

There is just so much wrong with your view here. First, the team that you are knocking out for this, are the Stormers, who weren't even in the Challenge Cup. They were the 7th ranked team in the Champions Cup. I've also already said there is good precedent to allow someone outside the league table who was heavily impacted early in the season by injury to get through by winning Challenge Cup. You've also lost the argument that Sharks qualify as the third (their two best are in my league qualification system) South African team (because a SAn team won the CC, it just happened to be them) in my system. I'm doubt that's the last of reasons to be found either.


Your system doesn't account for performance or changes in their domestic leagues models, and rely's heavily on an imperfect and less effective 'winner takes all' model.

Giving more incentives to do well in the Challenge Cup will make people take it more seriously. My system does that and yours doesn't.

No your systems doesn't. Not all the time/circumstances. You literally just quoted me describing how they aren't going to care about Challenge Cup if they are already qualifying through league performance. They are also not going to hinder their chance at high seed in the league and knockout matches, for the pointless prestige of the Challenge Cup.


My idea fixes this by the suggesting that say a South African or Irish side would actually still have some desire to win one of their own sides a qualification spot if they win the Challenge Cup though. I'll admit, its not the strongest incentive, but it is better than your nothing. I repeat though, if your not balance entries, or just my assignment, then obviously winning the Challenge Cup should get you through, but your idea of 4th place getting in a 20 team EPCR? Cant you see the difference lol


Not even going to bother finishing that last paragraph. 8 of 10 is not an equal share.

126 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian? Does the next Wallabies coach have to be an Australian?
Search