Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rassie Erasmus: Why Boks dropped Joseph Dweba

(Photo by Richard Huggard/Gallo Images)

Joseph Dweba has started in three Tests at hooker this year, but he has been ‘relegated’ to the South Africa ‘A’ team for the year-end tour.

ADVERTISEMENT

Malcolm Marx, 28 with 55 Test caps, and Mbongeni Mbonambi (31 and 52 Tests) are the two frontline hookers.

Deon Fourie, 36 and three caps, is listed as a utility forward that covers both looseforward and hooker.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Dweba (27, four Tests) and Andre-Hugo Venter (uncapped Stormers front row forward) are the specialist hookers in the ‘A’.

Erasmus confirmed that Fourie was selected ‘ahead’ of Dweba in the pecking order for hookers.

“We had opportunities during the Rugby Championship,” he said of Dweba – who started in the losses to New Zealand (23-35) at Ellispark and Australia (17-25) in Adelaide.

It was obvious there are aspects of his game that requires attention – especially the lineouts.

It was also glaringly obvious in the Stormers’ 31-22 come-from-behind win over the Lions at Ellis Park this past weekend that his set-piece game needs some improvement.

The Stormers were trailing 10-22 when Jean-Jacques Kotze replaced the Bok at hooker early in the second half.

ADVERTISEMENT

Once the line-outs were sorted, the Stormers produced a shut-out of the Lions.

“People will say you need to give guys an opportunity and see where they are at,” Erasmus said, adding: “They must grow and get better from there.

“Deon Fourie is a real option to take to the World Cup, just like Schalk Britz was [in 2019].

“We have three hookers in Malcolm [Marx], Bongi [Mbongeni Mbonambi] and Deon [Fourie].

“Deon scrums and also do line-outs and mauling at hooker for us at the moment.”

Related

He explained that the SA ‘A’ team has two hookers – Dweba and Andre-Hugo Venter, with Bulls youngster Jan-Hendrik Wessels that was selected as a loosehead prop, but can also fill in at hooker.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We have good stock at hooker for the six games [on tour],” the DoR said of the encounters against Ireland, France, Italy and Ireland – with midweek matches against Munster and the Bristol Bears for the SA ‘A’ team.

Dweba will have the two midweek matches to show what improvements he has made to the obvious shortcomings in his game.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
B
Bobbyboi 779 days ago

Dweba isn't even the best hooker at the Stormers

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 10 minutes ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

Well I was mainly referring to my thinking about the split, which was essentially each /3 rounded up, but reliant on WCs to add buffer.


You may have been going for just a 16 team league ranking cup?


But yes, those were just ideas for how to select WCs, all very arbitrary but I think more interesting in ways than just going down a list (say like fl's) of who is next in line. Indeed in my reply to you I hinted at say the 'URC' WC spot actually being given to the Ireland pool and taken away from the Welsh pool.


It's easy to think that is excluding, and making it even harder on, a poor performing country, but this is all in context of a 18 or 20 team comp where URC (at least to those teams in the URC) got 6 places, which Wales has one side lingering around, and you'd expect should make. Imagine the spice in that 6N game with Italy, or any other of the URC members though! Everyone talks about SA joining the 6N, so not sure it will be a problem, but it would be a fairly minor one imo.


But that's a structure of the leagues were instead of thinking how to get in at the top, I started from the bottom and thought that it best those teams doing qualify for anything. Then I thought the two comps should be identical in structure. So that's were an even split comes in with creating numbers, and the 'UEFA' model you suggest using in some manner, I thought could be used for the WC's (5 in my 20 team comp) instead of those ideas of mine you pointed out.


I see Jones has waded in like his normal self when it comes to SH teams. One thing I really like about his idea is the name change to the two competitions, to Cup and Shield. Oh, and home and away matches.

41 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’

"Yes I was the one who suggested to use a UEFA style point. And I guessed, that based on the last 5 years we should start with 6 top14, 6 URC and 4 Prem."

Yes I am aware that you suggested it, but you then went on to say that we should initially start with a balance that clearly wasn't derived from that system. I'm not a mind reader, so how was I to work out that you'd arrived at that balance by dint of completely having failed to remember the history of the competition.


"Again, I was the one suggesting that, but you didn't like the outcome of that."

I have no issues with the outcome of that, I had an issue with a completely random allocation of teams that you plucked out of thin air.

Interestingly its you who now seem to be renouncing the UEFA style points system, because you don't like the outcome of reducing URC representation.


"4 teams for Top14, URC and Prem, 3 teams for other leagues and the last winner, what do you think?"

What about 4 each + 4 to the best performing teams in last years competition not to have otherwise qualified? Or what about a UEFA style system where places are allocated to leagues on the basis of their performance in previous years' competitions?

There's no point including Black Lion if they're just going to get whitewashed every year, which I think would be a possibility. At most I'd support 1 team from the Rugby Europe Super Cup, or the Russian Championship being included. Maybe the best placed non-Israeli team and the Russian winners could play off every year for the spot? But honestly I think its best if they stay limited to the Challenge Cup for now.

41 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ ‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’ ‘The problem with this year’s Champions Cup? Too many English clubs’
Search