Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Recent history suggests you’ll want to watch the Super Rugby playoffs this weekend

Big hits, sweet tries – it’s finals time

While a lot of the talk about the Super Rugby playoffs has been the annual rehash about how unfair they are, it’s worth remembering something else about the four match ups we’ll being seeing this weekend – they’re all historically likely to be incredibly good games.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let’s have a look at the highlights from the recent past to get a gauge on what we can expect this weekend:

Brumbies v Hurricanes

You can actually go all the way back to the early days of Super Rugby to find a parallel with the first of the playoffs. In the 1997 semi final there was a Barrett starting for the Hurricanes – yes, that’s Beauden and Jordie’s dad Kevin at blindside flanker. Fast forward 21 years to the last time the Brumbies played the Canes and both of the Barrett boys starred in a 56-21 win in Napier. OK, it was a blow out, but the Brumbies managed to produce one of the tries of the season to baby-face halfback Joe Powell. Hurricane centre Vince Aso ran in a hat-trick that night, however they’ll have to do without him in this game because he’s out injured.

Crusaders v Highlanders

The Southern Classic has probably been the most appointment worthy viewing fixture of Super Rugby in recent years (at last if you’re a Crusaders fan with the ability to withstand cardiac arrest), and it only takes a look back to the 2015 game in Dunedin to find overwhelming evidence of that. That night the Crusaders triumphed 32-30, but it all came down to the last play of the game, when a controversial TMO decision disallowed a Patrick Osborne try. The two sides played another couple of barnburners this season, firstly with the Crusaders coming back from a heavy deficit to win in round 2, then Mitchell Hunt broke the Highlanders’ hearts in round 15 with an unplanned, off balance, but still perfect drop goal.

Lions v Sharks

Two of the traditional big dogs of South African rugby go at each other again in Johannesburg for the second time in a week. Admittedly, the last game wasn’t one that will stick in the memory – mainly because the Sharks were more than happy to lose that fixture, with the result of a win being a trip to Christchurch to face the Crusaders. Things were different back in round 6, when both teams ran it up and down the field in a game that eventually ended 34-29 to the Lions. The match wasn’t sealed until the dying stages, when Jaco Kriel latched onto a good kick return to score the winner in the corner.

Chiefs v Stormers

If people didn’t know who Dillyn Leyds was before the Stormers beat the Chiefs back in round 7, they certainly did after he threw the most outrageous try assist of the year in that game. It also included another try of the year candidate when Toni Pulu finished off a 95 metre move that Damian McKenzie started after fielding a pretty good downfield kick. McKenzie even set up Pulu for another memorable score in a first half that featured 42 points. This isn’t the only recent high scoring affair between the two teams, back in 2013 they went down to the wire in Cape Town – the Stormers won that one too, 36-34.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Does South Africa have a future in European competition? Does South Africa have a future in European competition?
Search