Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Wrong place, wrong time: Red Roses rotten final a case of 'black magic'

(Photos by MARTY MELVILLE/AFP via Getty Images and Greg Bowker/Getty Images)

The cruel beauty of sport was on show in the World Cup final as the energetic and loveable Black Ferns pulled off a fairytale win while the equally classy Red Roses were left with heartbreak.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pulsating, dramatic, gut-wrenching, miraculous, unfair, are all valid descriptions of the final. Superlatives to describe the spectacle don’t do the game justice.

The Red Roses were incredibly heroic and magnanimous in defeat and given an awful reminder that life is unfair. Things go wrong and all the planning in the world can’t help.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

They were dealt a bad hand, a fate-altering moment of epic proportion when Lydia Thompson collided with Portia Woodman.

World Rugby’s window-dressed solution to the concussion problem handed the Black Ferns a golden reprieve and evened up a contest that would not have been, with a 15 on 14 contest for most of the night.

Perhaps it was written in the stars. The Black Ferns were just a team of destiny and this is how they were going to pull it off. Fate conspired to make it happen.

Caroline Drouin’s sprayed penalty and then Thompson’s red were acts of divine influence. At the spiritual home of New Zealand Rugby, don’t discount it.

ADVERTISEMENT

The pre-match haka ritual from the Black Ferns is a challenge to the opposition, but it is also a call to the ancestors to help win the battle. It seems they were listening above Eden Park.

No one wants to see Portia Woodman left in the state she was. But a red card for an execution error does not, nor ever will, fix the problem.

This is the twisted outcome you get from poor policy that has yet to prove that it makes the game any safer.

A punishment previously reserved for malicious foul play has been ransacked for a virtue signalling crusade. We want a safer game, but hard line punishments for genuine mistakes do nothing for that cause.

ADVERTISEMENT

Prohibition has never worked in society, and even less so when there is no intent in the act.

If every player could suddenly execute the tackle safely, they surely would. The fact is, they can’t. It is not a controllable event at high speeds and errors will occur.

Players are only human and should be treated as such, even the so-called perpetrators who become the scapegoat in this deluded exercise.

One team is left materially disadvantaged as a result, on Saturday it was the Red Roses in the biggest game of their lives no less.

Losing Thompson was absolutely critical for the Roses a number of reasons, aiding the Black Ferns in untold ways.

Aside from the attrition factor that would play an inevitable part, the weakest vulnerability for the Roses just got magnified tenfold.

The Ferns were always going to target the fringes of the Roses, where they had leaked tries in previous clashes, now England were down a winger on the edge.

When Stacey Fluhler rounded the corner past centre Emily Scarratt less than twenty seconds into the second half, she ran through the ghost of Thompson’s vacant channel.

Fluhler needed every millimetre of grass down that vacant channel, firstly to get around Scarratt and then to score once Renee Holmes gave her the return pass.

It was a spine tingling moment of magic from the Black Ferns which set Eden Park into delirium, erasing a huge deficit on either side of halftime to shock the Roses.

It was also largely possible due to Thompson’s absence.

Again, perhaps it was all just the hand of destiny paving the way for the Ferns to do the impossible. The Ferns had the wherewithal to take advantage.

England’s own attacking game seemed to be derailed once they lost their winger. In the early stages with Hollie Aitchison at 12 the Roses had a playmaking link to release their own outside backs.

With their first raid out to the left barely two minutes into the game saw speedster Abby Dow chow down metres along the left flank with a pinpoint pass from Aitchison sweeping out the back in the movement.

Moments later fullback Ellie Kildunne glided over on the opposite corner as England went wide back to the other side.

Once they lost Thompson, there was no desire, nor reason to use width. They had to preserve energy for the uphill battle ahead and an expansive Roses’ game from that point was not on the table.

Having a playmaker at 12 in Aitchison was rendered useless. England’s options were limited and the Ferns knew that.

New Zealand played the contest far more intelligently in the second half after erasing the sizeable deficit, as halfback Kendra Cocksedge took control of the decision-making and plugged the corners to turn the England pack around.

With a lone defender in the backfield and one less member of the Roses back three to cover that space, Cocksedge made the right decisions to kick and Thompson’s absence was put under the spotlight further.

The Ferns pinned the Roses deep and forced them to exit frequently, knowing they would never run it wide, even in midfield zones.

England’s maul started to falter midway through the second half as the Ferns bench helped disarmed it for the first time with a key sack turnover around halfway.

Another try down Thompson’s flank came when reserve prop Krystal Murray barged through England’s halfback coming across in cover. Cocksedge had spotted a four on one down the under-resourced short side.

The home side turned their building territorial advantage into three second half tries, the last of which was a stunning piece of play from the Black Ferns midfielders.

The space in behind England’s line continued to appeal, with Theresa Fitzgerald threading a perfect grubber in behind.

Guess where? In behind the missing Thompson’s right wing spot with fullback Kildunne up in the line defending. Another piece of Fluhler magic later, the Ferns had the lead again for the last time.

To even be in with a chance to win at the end shows how good of a side England are. However, everyone knew the rolling maul was coming. Joanah Ngan-Woo’s hand will be revered in Ferns’ lore for disrupting that line out.

England beating the Black Ferns in front of a packed Eden Park, on New Zealand soil, in a World Cup final?

Related

It may have been what should have happened based on current records, stats and form. On probability it should have happened. But to any Kiwi, it just never sounded right. Some way, some how, the Ferns would win.

Desperate to restore their mana, with the support of the country finally behind them, they became a team of destiny and the impossible was made possible by belief and aided by perhaps by what you call divine intervention or ‘luck’.

An uncontrollable force that plays a part in everything. The Ferns asked the ancestors above for it when they did their haka, in an indirect sense, and they got it when Thompson was red carded.

If you try to explain the outcome of this game by rhyme or reason, you will be lost. It is easier to be guided by mythology here to make sense of it.

The Red Roses didn’t deserve the ending they got, they were just in the wrong place at the wrong time for a dose of ‘black magic’.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

9 Comments
S
Sam 753 days ago

Portia Woodman was statistically comfortably the best attacking player at the tournament. She led literally almost every offensive stat they keep a record of at the point she was injured.

Not only that she was in full flight potentially on her way to scoring at the time.

Try "Argentina only won because so and so was sent off for taking Messi out of the game" and you realise just how arrogant and stupid that part of this article sounds.

G
Grant 766 days ago

Great article. I regularly took my family to Super rugby games but stopped a couple of years ago. The main reason is the stop start nature of the game increasing and the outcome being determined by red cards - very frustrating to spend a few hundred dollars to see your team lose because a player made an error. It was poor and rookie play by the English player and in this case deserved a red card IMO, but obviously changed the outcome.

v
viv 766 days ago

Irrespective of the score the Red Roses have confirmed that they are the best womens rugby union team at the moment. No other team could have played 60 minutes and lost by only three points.

S
Stephen11 766 days ago

This is up there with the worst rugby pieces I've ever read.

S
Saint 767 days ago

I must say I love whiny articles from disillusioned writers.

All this talk about how the penalty was too severe for a blatantly face to face contact is a joke.

Those are the rules , deal with it

Also England being down a player, especially a world class player is not the only news , she knocked out in my opinion one of the best players in Portia. Both teams lost great players !!!

The game was still beyond great in the end.

P
Peter 768 days ago

Teams need to be able to cope with the loss of a player - remember Australia beating England while down a man, it is not impossible. Also remember it was 14 on 14 for 10 minutes and England just kept plugging away with their one dimensional rolling maul strategy. From the few moments when England moved the ball their backs looked very capable and it was a pity that they were basically unemployed for most of the game. Surely the England Head Coach is not going to win the coach of the year award.

T
Tom 769 days ago

Well I don't understand this article at all. For one, calling that tackle an "execution error" is ridiculous. She ran, up right, head first, into an upright player. There was no attempt to execute a good, technical tackle. There was only pure recklessness and a complete disregard for her own and the other players safety.

"If every player could suddenly execute the tackle safely, they surely would"

No they wouldn't. What are you talking about? Hurting another player is an incentive. Players regularly engage in dangerous play that is outside of the rules.

"Prohibition has never worked in society, and even less so when there is no intent in the act."

Leaving out the fact that this rule is not at all prohibition, this line by itself makes little sense. Society (if we are gonna do this) is run by rules/laws that prohibit and discourage certain behaviours to prevent harm through intentional and accidental acts.

The red card was a massive shame. It was also one of the more reckless and dangerous tackles I've seen that left one player prone for many minutes. I don't want the ref to judge on intention, it invites inconsistency.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 16 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

147 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

147 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave? Will Bristol's daredevil 'Bears-ball' deliver the trophy they crave?
Search