Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ref Watch: Ireland dodged a bullet in the scrum

Referee Mathieu Raynal (Getty Images)

Mathieu Raynal is the last top French official standing following the retirements of Jerome Garces, Romain Poite and Alexandre Ruiz and his appointment to last summer’s third test between South Africa and the British & Irish Lions showed the esteem in which he is held by World Rugby’s refereeing bosses.

ADVERTISEMENT

That day the 40-year-old did a fine job in the most testing of circumstances – following Rassie Erasmus’ video demolition of first test ref Nic Berry – but when he reviews his performance in the thunderous England v Ireland Six Nations encounter it is likely that he will be less satisfied.

The Big Call
Having the fastest sending off in international rugby history on your refereeing CV is probably a useful ticket to the post-career after-dinner speaking circuit, but also an incredibly difficult situation for any official to be faced with.

Video Spacer

Freddie Burns and Ollie Lawrence join the podcast! | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 24

With Max unavailable this week, Freddie Burns steps into the breach to join Ryan and special guest Ollie Lawrence. Freddie gives us his take on Leicester’s strong start to the season and what makes him the ultimate stand-in superstar. Ollie talks us through his relationship with Eddie Jones and how his career could easily have taken a different turn. We get the guys’ best MLR impressions and Freddie asks the question every rugby player poses when watching football.

Video Spacer

Freddie Burns and Ollie Lawrence join the podcast! | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 24

With Max unavailable this week, Freddie Burns steps into the breach to join Ryan and special guest Ollie Lawrence. Freddie gives us his take on Leicester’s strong start to the season and what makes him the ultimate stand-in superstar. Ollie talks us through his relationship with Eddie Jones and how his career could easily have taken a different turn. We get the guys’ best MLR impressions and Freddie asks the question every rugby player poses when watching football.

As the TV commentators immediately noted, a red card was the only possible outcome under the head contact protocols with which we have all become so familiar in recent years.

To his credit, once alerted to the situation by TMO Marius Jonker, Raynal worked methodically through the incident to establish beyond doubt that there had been direct head contact, that force was present and that there was no mitigation.

The ‘rugby’s gone soft’ mob who fill social media will doubtless wade in, but this is exactly the type of tackle which World Rugby’s working party aim to eradicate, and the fact that James Ryan was concussed and forced to immediately leave the field tells its own story.

Under trials in the Southern Hemisphere Ewels would have received a 20-minute yellow card before being replaced by (presumably) Joe Launchbury, and England being forced to play 78 minutes with 14 men may accelerate this debate north of the equator.

ADVERTISEMENT

Red Cards and the Refereeing Psyche
What non-referees will not appreciate is the extent to which the whistler’s focus on the job in hand is under threat following an incident like this so early in a game.

It is extremely difficult not to continually replay the incident in your mind while wondering if you could have done anything different to prevent the red card – although having the chance to review it on the big screen would allay the referee’s worst fears that a mistake might have been made.

As a result concentration on the rest of the game can be difficult, while a whole new dynamic is created as a result of the sending off. Pre-match planning often goes out of the window for both teams and the officials as the contest takes on a very different hue to that anticipated.

This was very much the case at Twickenham, but to Raynal’s credit his concentration appeared unaffected.

ADVERTISEMENT

Tiny Margins
Maro Itoje put in a huge shift for England and was twice at the centre of crucial calls which for me the officials got right.

His 12th minute slap on Jamison Gibson-Park which caused the ball to go forward caused a James Lowe try to be ruled out via TMO review. The key points here are that Itoje only played the Irish no.9 after he had lifted the ball from the ground and made contact with his wrist rather than the ball itself – since it went forward it would otherwise have been a deliberate knock-on and probably a yellow card would have followed given the incident’s proximity to the home line.

In similar vein, Itoje reached through a forest of bodies to grab Gibson-Park’s wrist after he lifted a ball from a ruck close to England’s line in the second half. By lifting the ball the ruck was over, and in effect Itoje was making a tackle which since he was on his feet and onside was entirely legal despite him still being part of the breakdown.

Scrum Carnage
The biggest area which Raynal will retrospectively view with concern was his handling of the scrum.

England fed ten set-pieces in total with two being reset. Of the remaining eight, the first ended in an Ireland penalty after which the hosts were awarded a free kick and six penalties.

The majority of these came as a result of Ireland going backwards on their tight-head side in scrums which wheeled.
The first question a referee asks himself in this situation is whether the wheel has been caused by instability in the initial engagement, in which case slowing things down and working with the front rows usually provides a solution.

Once he is happy that this is not the case, the next aspect to look at is whether one team is stepping backwards rather than driving forwards as law requires. This manoeuvre – known as a whip wheel – also can be accelerated by the loose had going across the scrum at an angle, and is illegal.

Finally, this leaves him with the option to either reset the scrum if he is unsure who is at fault or penalise the team he believes are failing to deal with the pressure being applied – in this case Ireland.

As Lawrence Dallaglio observed in commentary, French referees are trained to reward the pack which is going forwards, and this is what Raynal consistently did.

So far so good, but we then have to ask why, once Tadgh Furlong had been penalised four times for the same offence, Raynal took no further action to deal with this repeat infringement prior to his award of the sixth penalty in the 59th minute.

At this point Ireland were finally given a formal warning which, with only one further scrum taking place from which the visitors’ replacement front row won clean ball late in the game, then never developed into the yellow card which Engand will believe their scrum dominance earned.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
J
James 983 days ago

Agree with most of this.

On the red - absolutely, the decision was right - but maybe a fairer outcome would be 20/30 mins without that player, and a replacement.

I do question the scrum decision process though - either England should have been penalised not driving straight, or Ireland should have been warned earlier for repeated penalties.

How many other games has there been a 15-8 penalty count with no yellows?!

J
John 983 days ago

From where l was sitting and watching post scrum close ups, England's loose prop, Genge, kept going into Furlong at an angle after the initial drive, hence the delay in the wheel. Its all very well saying French refs favour the scrum that's going forward but if they are managing to do it illegally, as l maintain, then the scrum that's going backwards should get the penalty. Another case of inconsistancy in Test refereeing, l'm afraid.

M
Michael 985 days ago


"> ¨0¨"
However when Raynal took Furlong and Genge aside he said to Genge "you are sidestepping a little bit" up until this point nearly every scrum had been for wheeling. So the ref had witnessed an initial impact, a wheeling scrum with no significant forward movement and the loosehead side stepping in this situation but still felt the scrum was being wheeled legally?

R
Roy 985 days ago

So if we agree with you, we are just a mob? You're right and we're all idiots?

I can't speak for the mob but personally don't like that the rule change has the right intentions but some of the implications are damaging the game in the short term

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 1 hour ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Where? I remember saying "unders"? The LNR was formed by the FFR, if I said that in a way that meant the 'pro' side of the game didn't have an equal representation/say as the 'amateur' side (FFR remit) that was not my intent.


But also, as it is the governing body, it also has more responsibility. As long as WR looks at FFR as the running body for rugby in France, that 'power' will remain. If the LNR refuses to govern their clubs use of players to enable a request by FFR (from WR) to ensure it's players are able to compete in International rugby takes place they will simply remove their participation. If the players complain to the France's body, either of their health and safety concerns (through playing too many 'minutes' etc) or that they are not allowed to be part in matches of national interest, my understanding is action can be taken against the LNR like it could be any other body/business. I see where you're coming from now re EPCR and the shake up they gave it, yes, that wasn't meant to be a separate statement to say that FFR can threaten them with EPCR expulsion by itself, simply that it would be a strong repercussion for those teams to be removed (no one would want them after the above).


You keep bringing up these other things I cannot understand why. Again, do you think if the LNR were not acting responsibly they would be able to get away with whatever they want (the attitude of these posters saying "they pay the players")? You may deem what theyre doing currently as being irresponsible but most do not. Countries like New Zealand have not even complained about it because they've never had it different, never got things like windfall TV contracts from France, so they can't complain because theyre not missing out on anything. Sure, if the French kept doing things like withholding million dollar game payments, or causing millions of dollars of devaluation in rights, they these things I'm outlining would be taking place. That's not the case currently however, no one here really cares what the French do. It's upto them to sort themselves out if they're not happy. Now, that said, if they did make it obvious to World Rugby that they were never going to send the French side away (like they possibly did stating their intent to exclude 20 targeted players) in July, well then they would simply be given XV fixtures against tier 2 sides during that window and the FFR would need to do things like the 50/50 revenue split to get big teams visiting in Nov.

307 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Why World Cup winner doesn’t blame All Black for leaving New Zealand Why World Cup winner doesn’t blame All Black for leaving New Zealand
Search