Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ref Watch: The hand of Beauden Barrett

Beauden Barrett /PA

While New Zealand eventually beat heavily-weakened Wales by a near record-breaking margin, Wayne Pivac’s team stayed in the contest for around an hour.

ADVERTISEMENT

During this time two decisions by referee Mathieu Raynal came under close scrutiny with plenty of Welsh fans joining respected former players Michael Lynagh and Brian Moore in questioning the calls.

RugbyPass refereeing and laws expert Paul Smith has taken a closer look at the two incidents.

Video Spacer

Dan Biggar | All Access | Why the Autumn Series is the most brutal in rugby

Dan Biggar | All Access | Why the Autumn Series is the most brutal in rugby
We were lucky enough to speak with Dan Biggar on All Access with Jim Hamilton in association with Amazon Prime this week. Wales is set to embark on a tough Autumn Nations Series against South Africa, Australia and New Zealand.
Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 29:37
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 29:37
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    Dan Biggar | All Access | Why the Autumn Series is the most brutal in rugby

    Beauden Barrett deliberate knock-on

    What happened?

    Early in the match Wales countered from deep and released Owen Lane down their right wing.

    He made 30 metres to the halfway line before looking to offload to Johnny Williams on his inside shoulder.

    Beauden Barrett
    (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

    New Zealand’s fly-half anticipated the pass and lunged at it with his right hand, knocking the ball forwards to the ground.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    After consulting his touch judge and TMO Brian MacNeice Raynal awarded a penalty to Wales but took no further action.

    How Wayne Pivac saw it

    Wales head coach first responded to the suggestion that the outcome would have been different had the offence been committed by anyone other than the All Blacks.

    Wayne Pivac
    Wayne Pivac /PA

    “I don’t know if you can say that,” he said.

    Moving to the decision he added: “But certainly (since) the Barrett knock-on stopped the overlap we’d expect a penalty and yellow card if that was one of our players.”

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Paul Smith’s Analysis

    The first thing to clarify – based on some social media reaction – is that a one-handed knock-on is not automatically considered deliberate. That said, the use of one hand does sway the decision towards a penalty rather than a scrum since it is clearly easier to catch the ball using both hands.

    To award a penalty the referee has to consider if the offending player has “a realistic chance” of regathering the ball before it hits the ground or another player. In this instance, given the distance the ball travelled away from him, Barrett clearly deserved to be penalised.

    Moving to the question of a yellow card award, it is again worth clarifying that there is no directive stating that a deliberate knock-on automatically results in a sin bin.

    When considering this option, as with any other technical offence, the officials must next decide whether the offence is cynical and if it stops a dynamic phase of play and reduces attacking options. Where the offence takes place is also relevant – a card is more likely in the defensive 22 than in midfield since a lot less has to subsequently occur for points to result from the illegally-ended move.

    This knock-on took place 50 metres from the All Blacks’ try-line. Having watched multiple replays it is apparent that another defender was only a few metres behind Barrett which removes any possibility of a penalty try award.

    However, New Zealand’s no.10 had no chance of recovering the ball before it hit the ground and his action did end a dynamic attack which could have further developed against broken-field defence.

    On balance Barrett can therefore be considered fortunate not to have seen yellow – although it is not 100 per cent clear cut.

    Nepo Laulala yellow card

    What happened?

    Shortly before half-time Ross Moriarty carried into contact and anticipating the arrival of tacklers Laulala and Ethan Blackadder he stooped forwards from the waist which meant he led with his head.

    Blackadder bent to make the first hit but was unable to get below Moriarty’s upper body and as a result clipped the right side of his head.

    This bounced the Welsh flanker slightly towards Laulala who immediately attempted a second tackle – also from a slightly bent position – but again not low enough to avoid a much more significant contact with the left side of Moriarty’s head.

    Neither New Zealand player attempted to wrap their arms until significantly after the contact.

    Moriarty was forced to leave the field as a result of the collision.

    Raynal’s attention was drawn to the incident by his fellow officials and after review he showed a yellow card to Laulala for a “no-arms tackle.”

    Paul Smith’s Analysis

    World Rugby’s process for making head contact decisions requires the officials to consider if there is contact, how significant it is then whether any mitigating factors exist.

    In dealing with Laulala, Raynal and Macneice followed this protocol to the letter.

    The head contact was substantial, but given that Moriarty arrived at the contact point with his head just above waist level it was clearly difficult for the Kiwi prop to get low enough to make a legal tackle.

    The Welsh flanker’s head was also some distance ahead of his legs and lower body and a split second prior to Laulala making contact his running line was slightly shifted by the contact with Blackadder.

    A yellow card is therefore entirely justified.

    The question of whether Blackadder should also have been carded for failing to use his arms in the tackle is an interesting one.

    The level of force appeared less significant, which combined with the height issue and head-lead situation provided Raynal with enough mitigation to downgrade the offence to just a penalty.

    Had Blackadder’s tackle not been immediately followed by a more damaging illegal contact he may have faced closer scrutiny – but based on this mitigation the outcome may well have been the same.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Hong Kong SVNS | Day 1

    Behind the Scenes with the Australian Rugby Sevens Team in Hong Kong | HSBC SVNS Embedded | Episode 9

    The Rise of Kenya | The Report

    New Zealand in Hong Kong | Brady Rush | Sevens Wonders | Episode 4

    When the referee is put in an impossible position? | Whistle Watch

    The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

    Boks Office | Episode 38 | Six Nations Round 5 Review

    Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    10 Comments
    L
    Lmaris 1244 days ago

    Since the 2nd offense was worse and yellow carded the initial offense couldn't ALSO be yellow carded? This makes no sense whatsoever. Just yet another in a long line of bending the laws into origami to protect All Blacks.

    J
    Jeffrey 1244 days ago

    Both AB were legal. Welsh player led with his head which was at least 2 feet ahead of his hips. Both AB had shoulders at hip height. They could not go any lower and stay on their feet.

    C
    Camiel 1245 days ago

    Regarding the no hands tackle both players of the All Blacks went into the tackle not using their hands, or no intention of doing so. Both should have been yellow carded.

    Load More Comments

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Features

    Comments on RugbyPass

    e
    eandrew7 2 hours ago
    Crusaders vs Moana Pasifika: New best 10 in Super Rugby contender, Superman Savea

    I live in Dubai, a city epitomizing luxury, innovation, and rapid growth. Known for its iconic skyline, cutting-edge technology, and thriving economy, Dubai attracts people from all over the world, creating a melting pot of cultures and opportunities. With its growing real estate market, it has also become a hotspot for investors seeking profitable ventures. However, despite all its appeal, Dubai is not immune to the risks that come with the digital age, including online scams. Unfortunately, I learned this lesson the hard way when I fell victim to a fake online real estate investment scheme.I had come across an online platform that promised high returns from real estate investments in Dubai. The website appeared professional, with attractive visuals and solid claims of lucrative deals. Enthusiastic about the opportunity, I decided to invest a considerable amount of money AED 300,000. The platform made everything seem so legitimate, with detailed reports, customer support, and even seemingly real testimonials. As someone who lives in Dubai and is familiar with the local real estate market, I believed this was a solid investment opportunity.However, things began to take a turn for the worse after I made the transfer. At first, the returns appeared on the platform, but when I tried to withdraw some funds, I encountered strange delays. Soon, the website started malfunctioning, and the support team became unreachable. My investment appeared to have disappeared, and I realized that I had been scammed. It was a crushing experience to lose such a significant amount of money, and I felt both helpless and frustrated. Determined not to give up, I searched for ways to recover my funds and came across Trust Geeks Hack Expert Website, www://trustgeekshackexpert.com , a reputable company specializing in tracking down online fraud and helping victims get their money back. I contacted their team, and they took immediate action, carefully investigating the fraudulent platform I had invested in. Within a short period, Trust Geeks Hack Expert successfully tracked the fraud and managed to recover my AED 300,000.Dubai is an exciting place to live and invest, but this experience taught me a valuable lesson about the importance of being cautious when it comes to online investments. The city's dynamic nature and rapid growth also attract scammers who try to take advantage of people like me. Thanks to the diligent efforts of Trust Geeks Hack Expert, I was able to recover my funds and learn to be more careful when navigating online investment opportunities. for assistance, Email: info@trustgeekshackexpert.com (TeleGram Trustgeekshackexpert) & what's A p p  +1 7 1 9 4 9 2 2 6 9 3

    2 Go to comments
    R
    RedWarriors 3 hours ago
    'We had a good plan, we saw the opportunity to beat the Sharks': Leo Cullen

    I think Leinster had a plan to win both matches.

    The defensive pressure was impressive and it made things hard for sharks with the greasy ball. That’s not an academy team though, a lot of those guys have two SA tours under their belt and a load of Leinster caps. There were a few new caps but so few as to not effect the system. Gunne was a first start but he has had a good few appearances and is a talent in play and attitide.


    Sharks reaction to some early errors seemed to shout “Here we go again”.

    As good as Leinster played and as hard as they made it, I assumed that Sharks would have the quality to find a way. Leinster slowed the rucks just enough to cause Sharks some issues and overruns etc.

    The great Eben Etzebeth was missing and he is clearly great in motivating and driving a team as well as in play. Some thing more than Etzebeth missing. The Leinster players not playing today will be cheering and sucking energy from that performance as much as if they were there. That’s the spirit in the club. Anyone can see how bonded and loyal Snyman, Barrett and Slimani are in a small period of time. I think Leinster have a special setup up there, but Sharks are definately below average in belief, confidence and spirit based on Saturday.

    Obviously a straight forward kick for a draw was available at the end but I don’t think that would have been acceptable and Sharks must go for the win at home.


    Note: Zebo said in coverage that if Erasmus has the reigns with Sharks they would be no1 in URC and Champions Cup ‘By a distance’. I don’t agree with that ofcourse but in between sucking up to Erasmus he is clearly pinpointing what he believes is a coaching issue.

    4 Go to comments
    LONG READ
    LONG READ The technical tweaks that could send Wales back to rugby's top table The technical tweaks that could send Wales back to rugby's top table
    Search