Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Ref Watch: Wayne Barnes' seismic Andrew Porter call

GettyImages-1241930436

Ireland made history by completing a first series win in New Zealand in the most pressurized of environments – to which the cool head and precision accuracy of Wayne Barnes were ideally suited.

ADVERTISEMENT

The veteran Englishman, who took charge of his 99th test match – and third between the All Blacks and Ireland – certainly stepped up to the big occasion to provide a strongly-managed performance in which his usual clarity of decision-making was again very much to the fore.

While Jaco Peyper, Angus Gardner. Paul Williams and Ben O’Keefe all have a good chance of still being around with a whistle in their hand when next year’s World Cup reaches its latter stages, providing England are not involved, for me Barnes is currently a sure-fire pick to take charge of the final.

Video Spacer

Stephen Ferris, have New Zealand rugby lost their aura? | RugbyPass Offload | EP 42

Video Spacer

Stephen Ferris, have New Zealand rugby lost their aura? | RugbyPass Offload | EP 42

The Big Call
This test match, the series and quite possibly New Zealand coach Ian Foster’s job hinged on the 50th minute decision which eventually saw Ireland loose head Andrew Porter shown a yellow card for a head-on-head tackle on Brodie Retallick.

With the hosts throwing everything at Ireland in an effort to get back into contention, TMO Tom Foley drew Barnes’ attention to a tackle that had left the Kiwi lock receiving treatment for a facial injury.

“Green no.1 makes direct head-to-head contact” Foley advised Barnes before showing him the replay.

The man in charge proceeded to explain how he saw the incident with a stage-by-stage commentary before checking that Foley – who will already have viewed several replays before bringing the incident to Barnes’ attention – agreed with his interpretation.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Number one is upright, so we have got foul play,” he began. “It is an absorbing tackle, not a dominant tackle, there is no mitigation, I have a yellow card, do you agree?”

When the TMO concurred, Ireland’s prop was sent to the bin for ten minutes.

As was pointed out by Conor Mcnamara in commentary, the difference between this incident and the one which saw All Black prop Angus Ta’avo red carded seven days earlier was microscopic.

Knowing this, master communicator Barnes made sure that he clearly put the words “absorbing tackle not dominant tackle” into the public domain via the ref mike, to provide defence against the inevitable criticism of lack of consistency which will follow.

Referees are in a really difficult position at the moment, as World Rugby’s head contact protocols require them to make judgements on incidents which are – as Eddie Jones pointed out in the week – essentially accidents.

ADVERTISEMENT

There was clearly no foul play intent present in either tackle, but both players put themselves at risk of being carded by failing to bend into the tackle. This ‘reckless’ approach is what the current interpretation of the regulations seeks to curtail.

Given that Retallick was unable to continue, we can presumably safely assume that a level of force was involved despite the fact that Porter was going backwards when the contact was made.

Was Barnes correct to downgrade to a yellow? Was Peyper correct to show red? For me, under the existing protocol the incidents were so similar that the outcome had to be identical – a red card.

However, the finest of margins separates them, and I find myself in the unusual position of agreeing with Jones’ assessment that World Rugby need to find a path through the huge head contact muddle caused by their efforts to improve safety so we can get back to referees dealing with foul play that involves intent.

Related

Management
There is so much which aspiring officials can take from Barnes’ approach, but without doubt it is his firm but approachable manner which tops the list.

His default mode is extremely relaxed, but on the rare occasion that a player went beyond what he deems to be acceptable, Barnes instantly ups the ante and stamps his authority.

This was very evident in the second quarter when he could clearly hear Porter shouting at him from a distance of around 15 metres while a lineout was forming.

Barnes made a point of stopping the game then walking slowly between both sets of forwards.

“If you want to stand and shout at me I’ll penalise you,” Ireland’s loose head was reprimanded.

“I’ll deal with the gap please.”

Clarity
Barnes’ approach has several tiny elements to it which are extremely clever since they underline his authority and by doing so build player confidence in him.

He is also fully aware that the ref mike allows him to speak to a wider audience and explain what is going on.

When a touch-finder rolled around adjacent to the replacements without the ball making human contact he proactively called: “Ball live,” then once it had been touched – or later in the game when a lineout formed – he advised: “Ball not live.”

Should either side attempt a quick throw it will then be no surprise and there will be less frustration when he whistles to stop play.

In similar vein, in the second half when a loose ball emerged from a tackle and made contact with Tadgh Furlong’s foot as he retreated Barnes quickly told us: “Play on, it’s open play, no offside.”

 Quarter 1Quarter 2Quarter 3Quarter 4
Pens against NZ1232
Pens against Ireland2224

This week’s homework

After the errors made by last week’s officiating team in the wake of the All Blacks simultaneously losing two tight head props to cards, it was very clear that this week’s group had gone through the decision-making tree which assists when the spectre of uncontested scrums arises.

When New Zealand replacement prop Ofa Tu’ungafasi left the field for an HIA early in the second half having recently replaced home no.3 Nepo Laulala, Barnes immediately checked with the fifith official to ascertain that Laulala had been substituted tactically rather than removed due to injury.

Had the latter been the case, he would not have been eligble to return to the field and uncontested scrums would have resulted.

Since Laulala clearly had his leg heavily strapped during the first 40 minutes, he almost certainly departed with a minor leg injury – but providing the All Blacks management on the sidelines officially listed his departure as being tactical that is how it will be treated.

Teamwork
An all-English team worked well together and this smooth communication flow was at times very helpful to the flow of the game.

Ireland’s first try, for example, came from a lineout which followed a penalty called in by TJ Karl Dickson who spotted Sam Cane’s off-the-ball tackle on Josh van der Flier.

What’s in a Name?
Plenty of rugby watchers dislike referees using players’ Christian names, but Barnes does it with effortless ease and to my eyes to the benefit of all involved and without reducing his authority.

When needing to catch attention, especially in general play, Barnes is extremely natural when switching to first-name terms.

“Stay behind Aaron,” he warned New Zealand’s no.9, then later as the hosts sought to restart quickly “Jordie: Whenever you’re ready.”

However, when speaking to the captains, or communicating with the TMO it reverts to “Black no.7 or Green no.3.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

25 Comments
r
robespierre 878 days ago

I thought Barnes did well here. Looking back at the red the previous week, the NZ player steps into the tackle with the Ireland 13 and in fact spins out of it due to the force of his forward movement. Porter stands up to an onrushing Retallick and is justly punished with a yellow for not lowering his height. He didn't step into the tackle with force and that is a crucial difference.

A
Another 882 days ago

Fundamentally, I think that Ireland were the better team by a significant degree on the day, so it that sense it doesn’t matter. However, the ‘what if’ element of what would have occurred if Ireland had been reduced to 14 men for the duration of the rest of the game, in the same manner that NZ were the week before, will always leave a nagging doubt. That is the importance of referring consistency.

L
Laurie 887 days ago

Wayne Barnes makes crucial calls that always seem to go against the allblacks that have a big impact on the result of the game ..its like dejavu with him reffing he knows how to control the results seems bias to me

L
Laurie 887 days ago

What about the Irish offside alot they were rushing up so quick Barnes couldn't keep up ...the head to cheekbone on retallick should have been a red lazy play from the prop to make no attempt to dip or bend in the tackle putting himself at risk of injury aswell ..all I know is the abs will come back stronger and they will be out to prove to the world we are still one of the best teams in the world ...I can see the abs winning this world Cup next year we have the talent to do so with the right players on the paddock

H
Haunui 887 days ago

One week a direct head clash a red ,next week direct head clash a red. The only difference is that the teams are reversed. Bodie Retallick is uprigby and 6'8" . How can you get away with a head high tackle on someone that tall. It was ridiculous.

T
Thevamany 887 days ago

Aren't these the 4 officials on duty during the game when the Red card was given? If so, who failed to give their opinion in which game?

R
Ruaan 887 days ago

I like Barnes, primarily because he communicates well and I can generally follow his line of reasoning. I do think he tries to keep players on the field in foul play situations if absolutely possible, which I guess is another point entirely.

Here's the thing: Weren't the new high tackle protocols originally introduced to also protect the tackler? I mean, they both cop a hit, and I guess they both get their bells rung. So, where does that leave the attacking player as regards body height in the tackle?

And how exactly does the whole 'dominant impact' dynamic make sense? If you've got the tackler standing still but not dipping, with the attacker running into him full pelt, you still have the same risk-to-player problem. Two cars colliding head on is catastrophic, but how much better is a car hitting a wall at full speed?

It just increasingly feels like we're trying to legislate physics here. Massive men, high speed, big collisions, unpredictable movements. Those facts won't change.

C
Choo 887 days ago

In my eyes Barnes is a bigot

M
Michael 888 days ago

Neither hits deserved the Red card - Barnes right, Peyer wrong, what did deserve a Red card was Bundee's hit in the ruck on Ofa - just amazing Cane didnt ask Ref to review.

M
Mike 888 days ago

Good assessment Paul, but you failed to pick up on the fact the All Blacks lost another player to HIA when replacement prop got hit at break down by Bundee Aki hard on defence. The team of 5 missed it and did not even review. As per normal Wayne Barnes is a good ref but makes critical mistakes that have a major influence in a game including Ardie Savea being penalised when the ball was clearly out of ruck and the Irish had no halfback. This was a 7 point turn around and the Irish would have been no good down to 13. Consistency is lost to all when we have to tolerate poor decision making at critical times, when the same refs maintain their position at the top not allowing others through to show their skill set. Time to move on. The English ref's aren't to the standard of Gardner.
The game has to move on, what is happening is not helping the lovers of the game.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’ under Razor Ex-Wallaby explains why All Blacks aren’t at ‘panic stations’
Search