Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Referee Mathieu Raynal has admitted he got scrums wrong

Jonathan Sexton of Ireland in conversation with referee Mathieu Raynal as they leave the pitch at half-time of the Guinness Six Nations Rugby Championship match between England and Ireland (Photo By David Fitzgerald/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Matchday referee Mathieu Raynal has admitted he got the scrums wrong during England and Ireland’s Round 4 Guinness Six Nations clash last weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both sides were left miffed around Raynal’s handling of the scrums. Eddie Jones had claimed after the match that England’s scrum dominance was not rewarded, while many in Ireland claimed that England had been scrummaging illegally and got away with it.

“I’m a bit disappointed the referee didn’t allow us to scrum fully. That would be my only complaint – we were not allowed to play advantage away from the scrum. We got four scrum penalties and there was no sign of a yellow card,” Jones said. “We want to have a powerful scrum and if World Rugby want to have the scrum in the game they have got to allow the strong scrums to dominate. We are disappointed we didn’t get more out of that.”

Farrell on the other hand had said that Ireland would ‘liase with the right channels’ over England’s alleged illegality.

The debate around the set-piece continued this week, with former players and referees all giving their two cents on the matter, with some claiming that England loosehead Ellis Genge was wheeling.

Retired refereeing great Nigel Owens wrote “It [the scrum] hasn’t been refereed strong enough and is taking too much time to set up especially after a reset. We haven’t seen any game where the scrum has been an important area of attack or shown clear dominance by a team. We saw that with England against Ireland, although I thought a couple of those decisions should have gone Ireland’s way. I think refereeing of the scrum needs to be worked on, but players need to bring a better attitude to it as well.”

Related

Now, according to the Ireland camp, Raynal has issued a mea culpa to them over the set-piece behind closed doors.

ADVERTISEMENT

“There were a lot of talking points and lessons learned from the weekend,” said Ireland No.8 Jack Conan.

“The referee has come back and said a few decisions went against us when they shouldn’t have.

“But that’s rugby and those things happen. It’s always a good learning curve and we’ll be better for it.”

“I know the lads in the front row pride themselves around their bits in the scrum so they were pretty disheartened about it.”

Ireland now host Scotland in the Aviva Stadium, while simultaneously hoping England can upset Fabien Galthie’s Les Bleus at the Stade de France.

ADVERTISEMENT

“But it will just make us better this weekend for it and I think they are excited for the challenge and to right the few wrongs from Twickenham and end on a high.”

 

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search