Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Regardless of the France result Razor's All Blacks have proved something

Ofa Tuungafasi #17 of New Zealand celebrates with teammates at the final whistle after the team's victory during the Ireland V New Zealand Autumn Nations Cup rugby match at Aviva Stadium on November 08, 2024, in Dublin, Ireland. (Photo by Tim Clayton/Corbis via Getty Images)

I’ve seen enough to judge this All Blacks season a success, regardless of what happens against France.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s a belated success, but a success nonetheless.

The positive results help, but it’s more the way the team is now playing which encourages me most.

To my untrained eye, the All Blacks started this campaign by playing in the same ineffective way as their predecessors. They sought to be brilliant – and to blow teams off the park – without ever earning the right to.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

If head coach Scott Robertson and his team had brought any new ideas to the table, they weren’t evident.

I see the team’s win over Australia in Sydney as a tipping point. Having raced out to an early lead, the All Blacks were simply awful in the second half.

First five-eighth Damian McKenzie lost his starting role after that match and the game plan was simplified significantly.

And, why not? After all, the strength of the team this year has been its forward pack.

They performed well enough against South Africa, for instance, to have won both tests in the republic. It was only the scatterbrained backs that let them down.

ADVERTISEMENT

This team might run in the future but, for now, they’re content to walk. To do the simple things accurately and to eliminate the margin for error.

It’s not thrilling, but it’s working.

Fans had yearned for change, following the Ian Foster years, and in the tests subsequent to Sydney, against Australia, England and Ireland, they saw it.

So much so that McKenzie could resume duties at first-five without disrupting or undoing all the progress that had been made.

That’s huge. That suggests that the team has a coherent and cohesive method of playing, which everyone has bought into. The individual personnel might change, but the collective performance doesn’t.

ADVERTISEMENT

France might turn around and beat the All Blacks now. Who knows? That’s the beauty of a head-to-head contest.

But recent All Black teams had nothing to fall back on when the going got hard. They had little structure or substance and did desperate, irrational things in an attempt to play their way out of trouble.

We’re not seeing that now.

Ireland assumed they could bully the All Blacks in Dublin. They set their stall on exerting pressure and waiting for the All Blacks to fold in the face of it.

When that didn’t work, Ireland became the team that ran out of ideas.

That’s hugely heartening, even unexpected.

Many of us had come to the sad conclusion that the All Blacks had decided it was beneath them to be anything other than brilliant.

Assistant coach Scott Hansen said as much, when asked about Harry Plummer and the game plan implemented by the Blues this season.

Yes, it worked, Hansen said but, no, it wasn’t the type of footy the All Blacks wanted to play and, therefore, Plummer wasn’t the kind of first five-eighth the team needed.

Well, I’d wager Sydney changed that thinking. I think everyone involved with the team was so thoroughly embarrassed by that second half, that they finally accepted change had to come.

That signifies a successful campaign in my book.

Watch the exclusive reveal-all episode of Walk the Talk with Ardie Savea as he chats to Jim Hamilton about the RWC 2023 experience, life in Japan, playing for the All Blacks and what the future holds. Watch now for free on RugbyPass TV

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

11 Comments
T
Tk 4 days ago

Razor's ABs are certainly on the improve, as expected after a total change in coaches, philosophy and systems added to world cup cycle player retirements. However we still need to find new players at 10, 12 & 13. BB and DMac are both amazing with ball in hand but are not world class game drivers, Jordie is playing well but should have stayed at 15, Reiko could have been an all time great wing but is no more than an average centre. After being spoilt for years with Carter, Nonu and Smith we haven't really replaced any of them yet. We have a very good pack with options, 3 good young 9's and a plethora of outside backs in the team or emerging. 10, 12 & 13 will be our Achilles heel unless we start throwing players in. Dare I say Jacomb, AJ Lam and Proctor....?

L
LW 6 days ago

France were always going to be the toughest, and they are the team we haven't been able to beat. Ireland have moments but are overated frankly, no success in the actual pressure tournaments shows exactly how good they have really been.... paper tigers. France haven't won the WC but they have still been the bogey team for the ABs forever. Huge game.

B
BA 5 days ago

Last 2 times we been bit off our preferred front rows we got bullied a lil bit don’t see that happen now might even reverse that

A
Another 6 days ago

The Blues strategy - ongoing pick and drive - isn't what the All Blacks team is currently employing. They haven't changed their tactics, they have just strengthened the personnel - especially from the bench. Players returning from injury - Jordan Tuipolutu, Roigard have changed the form of the team.

B
BA 5 days ago

To me looks like they really trying to mix it up a bit in fact most teams seem to be doing that

G
GrahamVF 6 days ago

While the All Blacks look a much better side than the one that went down at home to Argentina, the success of the tour cannot be judged on two games. England ara mediocre side which lost to a side which got thumped by more than 30 points four times in the rugby championship. The value of the Irish win is much bigger but it will be put in perspective by the Ireland Argentine game this weekend. Ireland are nowhere near the team that won 17 tests in a row having only scraped a five out of nine wins in including wins over Italy and Wales starting with the WC QF. Scotland are a way better team than England as their comprehensive win last time out showed. The game against France is vital for the AB's to judge their progression.

B
BA 5 days ago

Nah bro they both good wins against good teams

H
Head high tackle 6 days ago

Graham, if you cant celebrate the wins whats the point of playing the game? I think most would have happily taken 3 from 4 on this tour and winning would be icing but losing just 1 test is still Cake. Its been a season of lost opportunity no matter the result. 3 tests and no real gains from a experience for the newbies perspective. I do get that winning is everything but a few more squad members getting bigger minutes would have been great. Either way, providing the B side doesnt lose to Italy it will be a OK year.

B
Bull Shark 6 days ago

Agreed. I simply can’t repeat myself enough. France are the toughest assignment this year. I think they’ve been preparing well for the 6 Nations. And I think they’ll be delighted to have the all blacks to test where they are.


There’s also a bit of an itch to scratch - a dominant win in front of their home crowd, against a top team.

G
GL 6 days ago

It would be simpler if you just admit that you were wrong vs re-writing your previous columns.


The backs alone did not lose the games, that is why the current bench is different!

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call Michael Hooper reacts to Scott Barrett’s controversial late-game call
Search