Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Remarkable Canada 'relish in the disregard the game often pays them'

Paige Farries of Canada and Alysha Corrigan of Canada celebrate winning the Rugby World Cup 2021 New Zealand Quarterfinal match between Canada and USA at Waitakere Stadium on October 30, 2022 in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Hannah Peters - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images)

England or New Zealand for the title? Or maybe even France?

The conversation dominating the ongoing women’s World Cup has largely been focused on those three teams, with their players hogging much of the limelight and profile as the competition reaches its conclusion.

ADVERTISEMENT

There is of course one other team in the mix, but outside of the Auckland bubble, many would be hard pressed to pick Canada out of a line-up as title contenders.

Having topped their pool with three wins and three bonus points, and efficiently dispatched the USA last weekend, it’s somewhat remarkable that Canada continues to fly under the radar, particularly when to know anything about Canadian women’s rugby is to know that their success is one of the most remarkable stories in the game.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Quick research highlights that the barriers Canada have to overcome to even get on the field are manifold and complex.

Take the fact that the country is massive (it’s quicker to get from London to the east of Canada than it is to travel east to west internally), add in a diverse climate which covers large parts of the country in snow for most of the year and throw in the need to navigate several time zones and a bilingual population and you’ve hardly got the recipe for success for a sport which is as chronically underfunded as Canadian rugby is.

But its women’s team has been a success.

World Cup finalists in 2014, they have rated amongst the world’s leading teams for two decades, and though no one fancies them to beat England this weekend, the fact that it is also quite possible, speaks to the tenacity of a team who relish in the disregard the game often pays them.

Star fullback Elissa Alarie, one of three players left at the World Cup who has played every minute of every game, believes all of it gives the team strength.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I do think dealing with all of those challenges translates to performance and it does unite us. When you have to fight on and off the field it just brings you together. This has been part of our culture for a long time and we are not the first team to go through it. Our alumni has fought as well in the past and we have them to thank for getting rid of the pay to play model here for example and for progressing lots of other vital areas for us. We’re trying to do the same for the next generation.”

Alarie is referring to a situation where Canadian players for so long had to pay to represent their country.

Former captain Leslie Cripps, who played in three World Cups, recalls well how difficult the model was.

“It was really tough. You were always having to firstly negotiate to get off work and then find the money to play. We had to do a lot of fundraising ourselves. One way we did this was through posing for what was a tasteful but still semi-naked calendar and then we had to sell them.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It was awful. I hated it. We used to be sent the calendars to sell, and I was in England then and I used to just send the money back myself and keep them all. I was an adult, trying to sell semi-naked calendars of my team to my co-workers. It was just ridiculous.”

There was often sympathy levelled at Rugby Canada, who have scant finance to invest in their women’s programme, but Cripps recalls some appalling inequities where the men’s team – largely unsuccessful by comparison, were held in far higher esteem.

“I remember being at a Nations Cup in Vancouver once and the men and the women were staying in the same hotel. The women had to pay $500 to play in the tournament and the men were being paid $500 to play in it. It was the same tournament, in Canada at the same hotel. We actually had to move out at one point to stay somewhere cheaper. We were joking around asking if we could just give our money directly to the men. Things have obviously improved a lot but that was tough.”

In the lead up to the World Cup in New Zealand, the Canadian players determined that they would find a way to spend more time together, despite not having much money to do so.

Alarie picks up the story.

“Our coach put on the board how many days teams like France, England and New Zealand would be spending together before the World Cup and we were miles behind.

“We brainstormed and we came up with a plan to fundraise and be together. We were five in an apartment, finding rooms here and there and we managed to extend loads of our existing plans. When we had the Italy game in Victoria we said OK how long before this game can we realistically show up. Most people took a leave of absence to do things like this, and it’s been a huge personal sacrifice, but the benefits have been enormous.”

Francois Ratier, who coached Canada to the World Cup final in 2014, believes that the challenges the team has historically faced has had some upside.

“We have always had to fight for everything and with that comes huge sacrifices for everyone involved. The upside of this is that of course it builds resilience in the team and among the coaches and gives everyone a real togetherness, but there is obviously a downside too. It can be frustratingly difficult for example to plan in between major events and that lack of control can be exhausting.”

To England this weekend, and Canada are facing a remarkably similar opponent.

Both teams have impeccable set piece credentials, and both have ruthlessly used their driving maul to score tries.

Alarie thinks though that they can surprise England.

“We know England very well and we do have similarities, but I am not sure that they know us well yet. We have evolved a lot in the past year. If we can bring everything together, we have an underdog mentality that is a big asset to us.”

As for going under the radar, she adds that that suits the team well.

“Not being talked about has been fuel on the fire. Even before the World Cup started, you hear the conversations about the teams and it’s rarely about us. Yet here we are trucking away and at a World Cup semi-final. We feel we’ve had a secret power in our team, and we’re now getting a chance to express it and show the world.”

Whatever happens this weekend, the game in Canada is at a turning point. With more and more rivals turning professional, and with strong club leagues being established, Canada is in danger of being left behind. So, what next?

“The girls deserve so much.” Cripps adds.

“The best-case scenario is that there would be parity between the men and women and that in Canada games would be easy to find and get to. The game there needs to be marketed better – I want to see us celebrating success and celebrating the profile of these amazing athletes. There are other issues like properly paying our coaches too – there’s a lot to do.

Ratier agrees that progress must be made.

“Whatever happens this weekend I hope we can see a strong focus and strategy to support the country’s top players as well as building our club game. We need it.”

Can Canada beat England this weekend?

“Yes,” Cripps replies without hesitation.

Ratier holds back initially and says his team needs to do “something special” to win it, before adding- Canada will hope prophetically.

“We’ve not had an upset at this World Cup yet, so perhaps it’s time.”

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 25 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

"has SA actually EVER helped to develop another union to maturity like NZ has with Japan," yes - Argentina. You obviously don't know the history of Argentinian rugby. SA were touring there on long development tours in the 1950's

We continued the Junior Bok tours to the Argentine through to the early 70's

My coach at Grey High was Giepie Wentzel who toured Argentine as a fly half. He told me about how every Argentinian rugby club has pictures of Van Heerden and Danie Craven on prominent display. Yes we have developed a nation far more than NZ has done for Japan. And BTW Sa players were playing and coaching in Japan long before the Kiwis arrived. Fourie du Preez and many others were playing there 15 years ago.


"Isaac Van Heerden's reputation as an innovative coach had spread to Argentina, and he was invited to Buenos Aires to help the Pumas prepare for their first visit to South Africa in 1965.[1][2] Despite Argentina faring badly in this tour,[2] it was the start of a long and happy relationship between Van Heerden and the Pumas. Izak van Heerden took leave from his teaching post in Durban, relocated to Argentina, learnt fluent Spanish, and would revolutionise Argentine play in the late 1960s, laying the way open for great players such as Hugo Porta.[1][2] Van Heerden virtually invented the "tight loose" form of play, an area in which the Argentines would come to excel, and which would become a hallmark of their playing style. The Pumas repaid the initial debt, by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park, and emerged as one of the better modern rugby nations, thanks largely to the talents of this Durban schoolmaster.[1]"


After the promise made by Junior Springbok manager JF Louw at the end of a 12-game tour to Argentina in 1959 – ‘I will do everything to ensure we invite you to tour our country’ – there were concerns about the strength of Argentinian rugby. South African Rugby Board president Danie Craven sent coach Izak van Heerden to help the Pumas prepare and they repaid the favour by beating the Junior Springboks at Ellis Park.

149 Go to comments
J
JW 6 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

149 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks' 'Springbok Galacticos can't go it alone for trophy-hunting Sharks'
Search