Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Remembering the dirty tactics that undermined the flair of the France 1999 RWC side

(Photo by Shaun Botterill/Allsport)

While there is an adage that no one remembers who came in second, France made a decent stab of proving the saying wrong in the 1999 World Cup final. Les Bleus produced a performance for the ages in the semi-final against the All Blacks the week before.

ADVERTISEMENT

Their spellbinding display of irrepressible flair shocked the tournament favourites at Twickenham, but it was a game that was still marred by controversy with accusations emerging from the New Zealand camp of biting, gouging, head-butting and even testicle-grabbing. 

To this day, the build-up to any contest between the two – particularly at a World Cup – will see the words ‘filth’ and ‘violence’ resurface.

Video Spacer

Chart-topping book author Ben Mercer guests on The Lockdown, the RugbyPass pandemic interview series

Video Spacer

Chart-topping book author Ben Mercer guests on The Lockdown, the RugbyPass pandemic interview series

The benefit for Australia, who were waiting for France in the final 21 years ago, was that they were well prepared for such underhanded tactics that may have distracted the All Blacks, which saw them squander a 14-point lead. 

Following a tip-off from their traditionally bitter rivals, Australia coach Rod Macqueen and captain John Eales devised a plan to walk off the field if France resorted to such tactics again at the Millennium Stadium. 

It may have been a hollow threat, but it was one that put referee Andre Watson on alert. Unsurprisingly, the Wallabies were met by a barrage of devious tactics by their opponents. 

Hooker Mike Foley, prop Richard Harry and scrum-half George Gregan all claimed that they were gouged and despite Watson’s lectures to French captain Raphael Ibanez, the warning fell on deaf ears.  

ADVERTISEMENT

Looking back on the victory 20 years later in the build-up to the 2019 RWC, RUGBY.com.au detailed what was heard said on Watson’s microphone by Eales, who himself suffered a damaged cornea. 

“I fear for my team’s safety” was one complaint to the South African official, the captain warning “if this continues, we will leave the field – we will just leave the field”.

France’s unswerving commitment to play in such a way was ultimately their undoing though as they conceded 16 penalties in total. Matt Burke kicked 21 points simply though penalties. 

Australia were no saints either in this match, Watson brandished a yellow card to Eales for recklessly entering a ruck. But as is so often the case in rugby (albeit maybe not in the previous weekend’s semi-final), the most ill-disciplined side lost. 

ADVERTISEMENT

After the victory, the accusations of gouging were raised by the BBC. Eales responded: “The French are such a good side, they don’t need to play like that.” It was a typically classy response, particularly in light of how the runners-up chose to behave.

Eales’ crimson right eye as he lifted the Webb Ellis Cup aloft told the story, primarily that France could not get under the skin of the Wallabies in the same way they did against Australia’s rivals across the Tasman Sea. 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

f
fl 17 minutes ago
England name Curry twins, one uncapped player for start in Ireland

1) how is that similar to what Woodward did?


2) Coetzee isn't eligible to play for England, and neither is Tyrone Greene.


3) You've picked a number of players out of position. CCS has barely played lock, Genge is a loosehead, and Stuart and Fasogbon are both tightheads.


4) A lot of these selections are just quite strange. I don't think anyone thinks Fitz-Harding is the best blindside (a position he hasn't played in over a year) in the country, or the best captain in the country. Similarly Kenningham and Coetzee are decent players, but certainly not clear standouts in their positions. That's not to say that you have to select on the basis of common perceptions, but its just not clear if there's any logic to what you've done here. Are you selecting based on form? Or on the basis of a specific tactical approach? Or just picking players almost at random from among the uncapped players in the premiership?


5) Ben Earl has been England's best player for the past few seasons. Leaving him out is very strange.


6) Reading some of your other comments, it seems like you think this English side is too old. I'm surprised you think that because:

i) they are actually quite a young team. The current England squad has 14 players aged 24 and under, which is the same number as the French squad, 2 more than Wales, and 8 more than Scotland. At the other end the England squad includes only 6 players aged 30 and up, which is 2 fewer than France, 4 fewer than Scotland, and 5 fewer than Wales. So of the squads named so far England's is comfortably the youngest.

ii) Naming old squads was exactly what Woodward did. England had a really old team in 2003, so if you want Borthwick "to do what Woodward did" then you should want him to rely more on the old guard.

14 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'One of the vilest acts' - Springbok in spotlight over URC incident 'One of the vilest acts' - Springbok in spotlight over URC incident
Search