Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Speargate: The 2005 scandal that changed the way rugby polices the contact area

GettyImages-53150768

In the history of rugby, no clearout at a ruck has ever been as contentious as the one that gave birth to the infamous Speargate scandal in 2005. Less than a minute into the 2005 British and Irish Lions’ first Test against the All Blacks in Christchurch, captain Brian O’Driscoll was cleared out at the ruck by his opposing outside centre and captain Tana Umaga, alongside hooker Keven Mealamu, in an event that will still leave a bitter taste in the mouth of many from the British Isles.

ADVERTISEMENT

With touch judge Andrew Cole mere metres away, the pair upended the Irishman and drove him head-first into the ground, dislocating his shoulder and ending his tour, only to go unpunished in the match.

For viewers at the time there was not great televisual footage of the offence, largely because this was so late that play, and the attentions of the cameramen, had moved on. The most noticeable thing was O’Driscoll’s cry of pain when landing more than anything visual.

Video Spacer

Dallagio looks back the 1997 tour with Big Jim

Video Spacer

Dallagio looks back the 1997 tour with Big Jim

This is what ultimately proved to be the problem, as, despite Lions coach Sir Clive Woodward reporting Umaga and Mealamu to the International Rugby Board’s citing commissioner, Willem Venter, there was deemed to be insufficient footage, and the pair were cleared. It was only in the succeeding months that more angles emerged which were more incriminating.

Speaking in a press conference the next morning, the Lions centre did not mince words, as the New Zealand Herald reported:

“I have no doubt whatsoever that it was some sort of spear tackle that ended it.

“My real disappointment was that he (Umaga) didn’t come up as I was being stretchered off which I thought would just be a common courtesy between captains, whether he had been involved or not.

“I don’t know whether that shows any element of guilt or not. At the time and post-match when I thought about it, that certainly disappointed me.”

ADVERTISEMENT

There is no greater indicator of the severity of the spear than O’Driscoll seeing it as a positive that he did not break his neck. But needless to say, Woodward was exasperated at the entire ordeal, and lambasted the citing process in a week long onslaught to the press by the Lions team. This was an event that furcated the two opposing camps beyond the simple status of being Test opponents, it created a new level of animosity, which was perhaps magnified by the Lions’ poor showing.

This opened widespread speculation that the All Blacks had targeted the Lions’ captain and talisman, something that the Rugby World Cup winning coach ruled out. He nonetheless described it as a “dreadful foul”, as reported in The Independent.

Umaga and the All Blacks head coach Sir Graham Henry were keen to move on from the issue despite the storm that was created, more or less saying that it was a part of rugby. Of course, from their perspective that is understandable as nothing productive was going to come out of discussing it.

The captain did comment on the position that O’Driscoll had taken though, particularly how he had not gone to see him. The BBC reported in a press conference that Umaga said he had other priorities at the time, saying: “At that stage I had to try and keep (the team) together. It was such a lengthy period, we had to sort some things out that worked for us.”

ADVERTISEMENT

By modern standards there is little or no doubt that both Umaga and Mealamu would see red for inflicting an injury in which it took 25 minutes to relocate O’Driscoll’s shoulder. Furthermore, with greater power to the television match officials today and advancements in technology, it would have been much easier to address the situation on the pitch and for the correct action to be taken.

Lions 2005
Brian O’Driscoll and Clive Woodward (Getty Images)

Even by the standards of 2005, this was still a reprehensible act, although it was not until the amateur footage of the clearout was made public that the IRB condemned it, despite having access to it beforehand.

But what lingers from that fateful night in Christchurch is some of rugby’s biggest ‘what if’ questions. Firstly, what if the Lions were able to keep their captain for all three Tests? Secondly, would the series have panned out in a different way had Umaga and Mealamu been punished in the match, or retrospectively, in the way many from the British Isles deemed justifiable? The All Blacks captain went on to score three tries in the series and was as potent as ever in the midfield.

2005 Lions
Fans hold up A banner showing their feelings over Tana Umaga and Kevin Mealamu’s joint tackle on Brian O’Driscoll (Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

The hosts were by far and away the better team throughout the series, but O’Driscoll was one of the giants of the game at the time and only managed 41 seconds of the entire series. While some may say that his presence, or Umaga’s lack of, would have been inconsequential, we would only need to fast forward twelve years to the Lions’ return to New Zealand to see the impact of a red card.

After dominating the first Test, a 25th minute red card to Sonny Bill Williams in the next meeting for a shoulder charge to the head of Anthony Watson was one of the deciding factors in swinging the match, which ultimately led to a drawn series after a third Test tie.

It is impossible to know whether the permutations of any different decision-making in 2005, but it left plenty of bad blood for years to come. However, it is something that is buried in the past for the two players.

The Ireland legend was quoted in The Irish Times 13 years later: “We parked it a long time ago.

“It was one of those things. Was it unfortunate? Yeah. Should you have dealt with it slightly differently? Yeah. You’ve got to move on. You can’t bring those sorts of things through life.”

The game has progressed in such a way that it is unlikely that there will ever be a situation akin to this one again. There will undoubtedly be decisions by citing panels that some may not agree with, but not where a player like O’Driscoll or coach like Woodward feel so mistreated. It goes to show how much has changed in 15 years.

ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 39 | The Investec Champions Cup is back

Argentina v France | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Men's Match Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | HSBC SVNS Hong Kong 2025 | Women's Match Highlights

Tokyo Sungoliath vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | Japan Rugby League One 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Reds vs Force | Super Rugby W 2025 | Full Match Replay

The Rise of Kenya | The Report

New Zealand in Hong Kong | Brady Rush | Sevens Wonders | Episode 4

The Fixture: How This Rugby Rivalry Has Lasted 59 Years

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
C
Craig 172 days ago

Was a shocking incident even for the time.Don't understand how the officials missed it.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Sally Thompson 1 hour ago
Exeter's Wallabies raid set to continue with two further signings

Services of cryptocurrencies are indispensable for secure transactions and asset management, but the complexity of digital currencies can lead to challenges, especially in recovering lost Bitcoin or other digital assets. Specialized recovery services like Brigadia Tech Recovery become crucial in such critical situations. With the growing adoption of cryptocurrencies, protecting these assets has become paramount to avoid financial loss, security risks, and missed investment opportunities. Reliable solutions are essential, and Brigadia Tech Recovery emerges as a beacon of hope in this context. Brigadia Tech Recovery is renowned for its expertise in recovering lost Bitcoin and digital currencies, setting itself apart as the go-to solution for those grappling with lost funds. My personal experience with Brigadia Tech Recovery highlighted their unmatched proficiency. Despite not reaching out to them initially about my $144,000 in misplaced Bitcoin, they swiftly became the beacon of hope I desperately needed. Their efficiency in recovering my lost funds surpassed other services, emphasizing Brigadia Tech Recovery's position as the unsung hero of cryptocurrency recovery. Their team of experts possesses in-depth knowledge of digital assets, offering hope to individuals seeking to reclaim what is rightfully theirs. With advanced security features and an intuitive interface, Brigadia Tech Recovery ensures enhanced protection and seamlessly guides users through recovery. By providing clear instructions and personalized support, they make the daunting task of Bitcoin recovery hassle-free for investors of all levels. Brigadia Tech Recovery has a new standard in Bitcoin recovery solutions, providing investors with a reliable method to safeguard their digital assets. Their expertise, efficiency, and dedication to user experience establish them as a trusted partner in the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency. For anyone facing the distress of lost funds, brigadia tech remikeable, Stands ready to offer assistance and restore hope in challenging times. I am deeply grateful to know about Brigadia Tech Recovery. To learn more about Brigadia Tech Recovery, contact them

Email:(Brigadia tec hremikeable (@) Proton (.) me)

1 Go to comments
S
Sally Thompson 1 hour ago
Exeter's Wallabies raid set to continue with two further signings

Services of cryptocurrencies are indispensable for secure transactions and asset management, but the complexity of digital currencies can lead to challenges, especially in recovering lost Bitcoin or other digital assets. Specialized recovery services like Brigadia Tech Recovery become crucial in such critical situations. With the growing adoption of cryptocurrencies, protecting these assets has become paramount to avoid financial loss, security risks, and missed investment opportunities. Reliable solutions are essential, and Brigadia Tech Recovery emerges as a beacon of hope in this context. Brigadia Tech Recovery is renowned for its expertise in recovering lost Bitcoin and digital currencies, setting itself apart as the go-to solution for those grappling with lost funds. My personal experience with Brigadia Tech Recovery highlighted their unmatched proficiency. Despite not reaching out to them initially about my $144,000 in misplaced Bitcoin, they swiftly became the beacon of hope I desperately needed. Their efficiency in recovering my lost funds surpassed other services, emphasizing Brigadia Tech Recovery's position as the unsung hero of cryptocurrency recovery. Their team of experts possesses in-depth knowledge of digital assets, offering hope to individuals seeking to reclaim what is rightfully theirs. With advanced security features and an intuitive interface, Brigadia Tech Recovery ensures enhanced protection and seamlessly guides users through recovery. By providing clear instructions and personalized support, they make the daunting task of Bitcoin recovery hassle-free for investors of all levels. Brigadia Tech Recovery has a new standard in Bitcoin recovery solutions, providing investors with a reliable method to safeguard their digital assets. Their expertise, efficiency, and dedication to user experience establish them as a trusted partner in the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency. For anyone facing the distress of lost funds, brigadia tech remikeable, Stands ready to offer assistance and restore hope in challenging times. I am deeply grateful to know about Brigadia Tech Recovery. To learn more about Brigadia Tech Recovery, contact them

Email:(Brigadiatechremikeable (@) Proton (.) me)

1 Go to comments
f
fl 1 hour ago
Why Les Kiss and Stuart Lancaster can lead Australia to glory

“Explain clearly how that’s not an achievement?”

It is an achievement. It is less of an achievement than he managed with Barcelona. You said that ”He has gotten better with age. By every measure.” He hasn’t. Doesn’t mean he isn’t still extremely good though!


”I thought you don’t care what certain managers did 10 years ago…”

are you really this incapable of understanding the context of what I’m saying? My point is that Gatland was a good coach ten years ago, and isn’t a good coach now. So what he did ten years ago is relevant to whether he was good ten years ago - that is pretty basic stuff.

On the other hand, what Les Kiss did ten years ago isn’t relevant to how good he is now, just as what Gatland did ten years ago isn’t relevant to how good he is now.


”So you haven’t watched even a minute of Super Rugby this year?”

I was replying to your comment, given you have the memory of a goldfish and are unable to scroll up, I’m remind you what you said:

“Ireland won a long over due slam in 2009. The last embers of a golden generation was kicked on by a handful of young new players and a new senior coach. Kiss was brought in as defence coach and was the reason they won it. They’d the best defence in the game at the time. He all but invented the choke tackle. Fittingly they backed it up in the next world cup in their 2011 pool match against… Australia. The instantly iconic image of Will Genia getting rag-dolled by Stephen Ferris.”

172 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Why NZR's Ineos settlement may be the most important victory they'll enjoy this year Why NZR's Ineos settlement may be the most important victory they'll enjoy this year
Search