Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Rennie's Law: Five ex-Wallabies who could return under Dave Rennie's proposed eligibility changes

(Photo by Matt Roberts/Getty Images)

The prospect of more offshore-based Wallabies donning the green and gold of Australia has taken a step closer to coming to fruition in the wake of Dave Rennie’s comments made on Monday.

ADVERTISEMENT

In what could prove to be a groundbreaking move, the incoming Wallabies head coach said he is open to altering the Giteau Law.

Named after former Wallabies star Matt Giteau, the rule allows Australian players with 60 or more test caps and seven years of service in the domestic game who are now based overseas to be eligible for international selection.

Video Spacer

Chiefs fans reaction vs Blues

Video Spacer

Chiefs fans reaction vs Blues

Rugby Australia first introduced the law five years ago to make Giteau and Drew Mitchell – both of whom were playing club rugby for Toulon in France, which initially ruled them out of Wallabies contention – available for the 2015 World Cup.

The move worked wonders for the side then-coached by Michael Cheika, as the duo played pivotal roles in guiding Australia through an unexpectedly successful campaign that saw them top the ‘Pool of Death’ and finish runners-up to the All Blacks.

The Giteau Law has since been used in the ensuing years to make a raft of overseas-based Australians – such as Sekope Kepu, James Horwill, Will Genia, Adam Ashley-Cooper and Tatafu Polota-Nau – eligible for Wallabies selection.

Players with under 60 caps who have played club rugby abroad – like Nic White, Matt Toomua and James O’Connor – have also become eligible for the Wallabies in the past after signing deals that will see them return to Australian Super Rugby in future years.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fronting media in a video conference earlier today, Rennie said he is eager to reassess the Giteau Law, though.

The outgoing Glasgow Warriors boss outlined he didn’t want to scrap the ruling entirely to let all offshore-based players eligible for the Wallabies, as South Africa did in the lead-up to their World Cup success in Japan last year.

He said that would devalue the domestic product in Australia as the nation’s top players would move away to “chase the big money knowing they can still play for their country”.

The two-time Super Rugby-winning former Chiefs coach revealed he is “not a big fan of trying to pluck guys out of France”, and instead wanted to shift the focus of the Giteau Law closer to home.

ADVERTISEMENT

Toying with the idea of a revamped Super Rugby competition that would include franchises from New Zealand and Australia, as well as Top League clubs from Japan, Rennie suggested that Australians playing in that competition, but for Kiwi or Japanese teams, could still be available for Wallabies selection.

“We’ve certainly got players playing in that (Top League) competition and whether that would make them eligible for selections (is worth considering) because you can compare apples with apples,” he said.

“If we had a Wallaby playing for the Blues, for example, we get to see him playing against the best Aussies.

“From a selection point of view that makes sense.”

By keeping Australian players in contention for international rugby by letting them play for offshore clubs in a competition that still involves Australian teams would open up numerous options selection-wise for the new Wallabies boss.

There are plenty of former Wallabies and uncapped Australians signed with wealthy clubs in Japan, but have made themselves unavailable for international rugby in doing so as they haven’t met the 60-cap threshold under the current ruling.

The concept of capped Wallabies playing Super Rugby in New Zealand isn’t that uncommon either, but it makes those less experienced players – from an international standpoint – just as ineligible as those playing in Japan.

Rennie’s new law change suggestions would blow those barriers out of the water, though, which could markedly strengthen his upcoming Wallabies squads.

While there are some players signed with Japanese clubs who are still eligible under the current Giteau Law rules – including Bernard Foley, Quade Cooper and Adam Ashley-Cooper – there are others who would benefit from an alteration to the law.

They don’t include the Panasonic Wild Knights’ David Pocock and Genia of the Kintetsu Liners, as they have both announced their retirements from the international game, but here are five ex-Wallabies who could be in line for a test re-call if the ‘Rennie Law’ is implemented.

Samu Kerevi (Suntory Sungoliath)

One of Australia’s key players at the 2019 World Cup, former Queensland Reds midfielder Samu Kerevi has cut short his promising international career far earlier than most would have liked in favour of the financially-rich Top League.

Making his debut for the Wallabies against England in 2016, the barnstorming 26-year-old played the last of his 33 tests against the same opposition the the 40-16 World Cup quarter-final defeat in Oita last October.

(Photo by Matt Roberts/Getty Images)

Three months later, he made his Top League debut for Suntory Sungoliath, scoring a try in their 26-19 loss to the Toshiba Brave Lupus in Tokyo.

Among the world’s best ball-carriers from the midfield, Kerevi would be a valued asset in the Australian No. 12 jersey, where he would thrive alongside the likes of fellow centres James O’Connor, Jordan Petaia and Tevita Kuridrani.

Sean McMahon (Suntory Sungoliath)

The Wallabies were dealt a hefty blow when it was announced in 2017 that upcoming loose forward Sean McMahon would be taking his talents to Japan after he signed a deal with Suntory Sungoliath.

The ex-Melbourne Rebels youngster has been a highly-regarded prospect ever since he burst onto the international scene following his test debut against Wales in 2014 as a 20-year-old, and would still be a shoe-in selection for the Wallabies.

Sean McMahon
(Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

In what may be a positive sign for Rugby Australia, a deal was struck between the governing body and Suntory late last year to allow McMahon to play for the national sevens side as he eyed a place at the now-postponed Tokyo Olympics.

Rennie would be eager to strike a similar agreement to allow the 26-test star to play for the Wallabies once again, as he would create a formidable loose forward trio with any one of Michael Hooper, Isi Naisarani, Pete Samu, Liam Wright, Rob Valetini or Harry Wilson.

Christian Lealiifano (NTT Communications Shining Arcs)

The decision to sign a well-paid deal with NTT Communications Shining Arcs ahead of the 2020 Top League season was a richly-deserved one for Christian Lealiifano, who completed a comeback of miracle proportions last year.

Diagnosed with leukaemia four years ago, the ex-Brumbies playmaker recovered within a year and made his first Wallabies appearance since 2016 when he took to the field against Argentina in the Rugby Championship last July.

(Photo by Dan Mullan / Getty Images)

His fairytale rise to the World Cup came to an end in the quarter-final defeat to England, seemingly bringing the curtain down on the 31-year-old’s 26-test career.

That might not be the case should Rennie’s amendments be made to the Giteau Law, though, which could see Lealiifano – who still has plenty to offer – reinstated into the national set-up alongside fellow pivots Matt Toomua and Noah Lolesio.

Mike Harris (Toshiba Brave Lupus)

It’s been a long time between drinks for former Wallabies playmaker Mike Harris, who last represented his adopted nation in 2013.

The New Zealand-born five-eighth, who can fill either the No. 10 or No. 12 jerseys, has since enjoyed a journeyman-like career since he played the last of his 10 tests, turning out for the Reds, Rebels, North Harbour and Lyon.

(Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Now at the Toshiba Brave Lupus, where he has been since 2018, Harris could come into contention for a Wallabies re-call for the first time since 2016 under Rennie’s recommendations.

That may be a tough ask given the likes of Lealiifano, Toomua, Lolesio, O’Connor and Kerevi would be pushing for places in his positions, but the 31-year-old would nevertheless be available for selection if required.

Jermaine Ainsley (Highlanders)

Following in the footsteps of Australian-born one-cap All Blacks prop Tyrel Lomax, Melbourne Rebels front rower Jermaine Ainsley has penned a two-season deal to join the Highlanders from 2021.

The transfer means the 24-year-old tighthead prop will return to his hometown region, having been born and raised in Otago before jetting off to Western Australia after completing his schooling at Otago Boys’ High School.

(Photo by Brook Mitchell/Getty Images)

However, the flip side of that deal means the three-test Wallaby will be ineligible for an international call-up for the next two seasons under the current Giteau Law, which may be detrimental to his chances of playing at the 2023 World Cup in France.

Rennie’s law changes would alleviate those concerns, though, and the experience Ainsley would bring back from New Zealand would undoubtedly add quality to Australia’s propping stocks, which already boasts the services of Taniela Tupou, Allan Alaalatoa, Scott Sio and James Slipper.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Young Highlanders tested by Jamie Joseph's preseason Jamie Joseph testing young Highlanders
Search