Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Replacing Aaron Smith with TJ Perenara put the All Blacks' backline at a massive disadvantage

(Photo by Marty MELVILLE / AFP) (Photo by MARTY MELVILLE/AFP via Getty Images)

There is an argument to be made that Aaron Smith is the best All Black of his time.

Just as there’s a similar argument to be made that he is the best All Blacks’ halfback of all-time.

Speed is the great strength of Smith’s game. Speed of thought, speed of movement and speed of pass. In an era where teams yearn to play at pace and catch defensive lines in disarray, Smith’s skills are a huge advantage to every team he plays in.

Why, then, would you ever replace that guy with TJ Perenara?

I greatly admire Perenara. I haven’t always, but you can’t deny the man’s work-ethic and combativeness. He might not be the most talented player in the world, but few try harder.

Really and truly, though, you are putting the All Blacks’ backs at a massive disadvantage every time Perenara takes the field. His strengths don’t appear to align with the team’s preferred method of play and – at the risk of sounding a halfwit here – surely it makes more sense to have a more Smith-like halfback on the park?

I get this whole idea of teams having finishers or closers and I won’t pretend Perenara hasn’t performed well in that role over the years. Equally, I’d contend Beauden Barrett might have had a better time of it had Brad Weber worn No.9 when the All Blacks met the Wallabies in Brisbane the other night.

Test match rugby is a good product when you’ve got a contest. And again – at the risk of sounding a halfwit – the previous week’s 43-5 victory in Sydney felt a hollow one. Australia were awful that night and beating them didn’t feel like a huge achievement.

The Wallabies’ 24-22 win at Suncorp Stadium exposed a few things about the All Blacks and, in the grand scheme of things, that’s beneficial.

Walkovers won’t win New Zealand the next Rugby World Cup. The players need to face challenges and failures if they’re to improve and the coaches are to sort the wheat from the chaff.

Ian Foster didn’t roll a great starting XV onto Suncorp Stadium and then didn’t appear to have great faith in those on the bench. Despite sapping humidity and a slightly superior foe, Foster persevered with players such as Perenara and people are entitled to be critical of that.

Let’s run through the team that took the park the other night. In the backs, Anton Lienert-Brown, Beauden Barrett and Perenara are proven test performers.

Ardie Savea, Sam Cane, Sam Whitelock, Scott Barrett and Codie Taylor are all test-match quality forwards. That’s eight out of 15, with Damian McKenzie the only bench player you’d mention in the same breath.

Are we actually as good as we like to think we are? Or was this just a poor test 23?

We as fans, and alleged pundits, don’t help. You’d think, for instance, that Akira Ioane produced one of the all-time great 80-minute performances, judging by some of the praise he’s received.

The bar has slipped absurdly low if we’re commending cameos like that.

As good as it was to see a contest on Saturday, so it was to have some consistency. Referee Nic Berry was right to send Ofa Tuungafasi and Lachie Swinton off, just as he was to sinbin Marika Koroibete and Scott Barrett.

If that’s World Rugby’s standard and foul play or high tackles are going to be judged in that fashion, then happy days. Cue the justified howls of outrage, though, when Owen Farrell again escapes punishment for similar.

There was some absolute loads of rubbish talked about intent on Saturday night. And whether, as they love to say in rugby league, high tackles are a bloke’s “go’’ or not.

Again, if that’s World Rugby’s standard and referees are going to stick to it, then that’s a great outcome for the game. We can’t allow tacklers to attack the head of ball runners, no matter whether they intended to or not.

But, hey, how good is a loss? How much are you looking forward to New Zealand against Australia being a rivalry again? How keen are you to see tests against South Africa and England and France on the schedule again?

Sport is better for uncertainty and intrigue and talking points and Saturday night at Suncorp Stadium provided us with plenty. Long may that continue.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Boks Office | Episode 37 | Six Nations Round 4 Review

Cape Town | Leg 2 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 21 minutes ago
How Rassie Erasmus and the Springboks are winning rugby's secret information war

Why and how have the Springboks leaped ahead in terms of innovation? It all comes down to Erasmus and the coaching culture he has built. The Springboks are masters in innovation because they know what winning rugby is and they know that they need to do to evolve and stay ahead. Erasmus chooses to be proactive rather than reactive. He had Nienaber institute his rush and his defensive IP when he joined. He had Felix Jones institute his IP on both attack and defence. When the law changes came in he brought in Tony Brown to add his IP so the Springboks could evolve their attack knowing the same old formula would not work. Now that Flannery has taken the defensive reins, he has been fine tuning Nienaber’s structure and making his own mark. Erasmus doesn’t stand in the way of his coaches. He empowers them and lets them add to the balance. He doesn’t try to dictate, he takes in information and adapts to changes. There is consensus in the group which allows them to all pull in the same direction and allows the Springboks to evolve. He has created a learning environment and succession planning. Stick and Davids are high quality coaches in their own right adding so much value to the set up but imagine the IP they must have gained learning from some of the games leaders in a wide variety of coaching areas. Erasmus has empowered them to succeed. He is now doing the same with Vermeulen and mentoring him. He used Proudfoot and later Human to get an edge in the specialist area of scrummaging and used Walters and Edwards to shape Springbok player conditioning to give them a physical edge and manage the physical needs of the players expertly. Erasmus does not dominate his coaches, he gives them a free hand, he guides them and guides the overall plan. He is a master man manager and motivator and not a dictator. He brings in coaches that add value and who can guide the evolution of the gameplan so that the Boks can win. What sets the Springboks apart is not just the IP they have gained but how they are using it.

10 Go to comments
B
Bull Shark 1 hour ago
How Rassie Erasmus and the Springboks are winning rugby's secret information war

👌


Nice one Nick. I used to think New Zealand were the masters of gleaning information from their coaches from across the globe. And always felt that SA was missing a trick of their own. Until we started exporting coaches much like New Zelaand does.


Rassie will long be remembered for putting the boks back on track and then on top of the pile. A legend for what he has done, love or hate him.


Long may it last, because of course teams have seasons. We’ve seen the ABs and now possibly the Irish seasons change.


I think what you are hitting on for me is that the health of the coaching pipeline, the quality of the coaches being developed is the best indicator of where sustainable results for international teams will come from.


I think England and Australia have some potential in terms of coaches out there and developing. How and if that is ever successfully brought into the national setup in a thoughtful, integrated way stands to be seen.


Because that’s where Rassie (who had cited the ABs in particular in this regard) has actually been his most successful. Making the springboks the ultimate goal, getting the systems to at least work in some synchronous way despite politics and competing interests. And in a country like SA!


When he moves on from coaching the boks, I sincerely hope World Rugby considers him for some role. Or at least - I hope he leads SA rugby. Perhaps as president of SA rugby.


The man’s mouth might not always seen as coming from the right place but his heart is. And he is a true leader.


PS. I don’t see a lot about France in my feed - and I should look more deeply, but while France has resources currently, I’m not sure what their coaching stocks look like and across the globe. Galthie seems like a generational coaching talent.


PPS. It will be interesting to see how many player turned coaches emerge out of this current springbok era. I think there are a few players who show great potential as future coaches. Having experienced Rassie, and possibly being encouraged and influenced in that direction.


Apart form Vermeulen, I suspect Frans Steyn might make a little dent coming out of the Free State. He’s a good man too. And I think he has good game smarts. He leads with heart too.


I have read that Willie le Roux is another potential. Although I think he’s bat sh1t crazy!


I have a feeling Kitschoff might make a move into coaching too. There are a lot of good rugby brains in the player group. The future looks bright for SA in this regard and with Rassie directing things in some further bigger picture role, I think this bodes well for us and sustaining a season of success for the boks.

10 Go to comments
S
Spew_81 1 hour ago
Stat chat: Clear favourite emerges as Sam Cane's All Blacks successor

Do they want to replace Sam Cane and his capabilities? Or do they want something different? What do they want from the loose forward trio?

 

If the All Blacks to want to play their flowing, offloading game. They need more players who can bend/brake tackles and offload. That was one of the weaker aspects of Sam Cane’s game.

 

In 2024 the All Blacks set piece returned to world class. The ruck and maul work was good. The goal kicking and punting was good enough. You would’ve expected an All Blacks team, with those positives, to dominate. But most of the games were uncomfortably close for their liking. Part of the reason is that rush defences are extremely effective at countering the ‘offloading game’.

 

To get the ‘offloading game’ working, they need more power runners. Having a true left wing, Caleb Clark, made a difference. Roigard made a difference at 9. The midfield seems to be under achieving, but the backs aren’t the focus of this article.

 

The front row’s running game is good. As with the locks'; Vaa’i really broke through last year. If Holland gets in, he could reproduce the consistent ‘go forward’ that Retallick delivered; while also having more height and work rate than Tuipulotu.

 

That leaves the loose trio. Savea is a good all around openside. While he’s not the cleanout/tackle/turnover machine that Cane was, Cane did not have Savea’s running game. The question is – does one player have to be the cleanout/tackle/turnover machine – or can it be split between the pack?

 

Sititi is mobile, a solid lineout option, and has openside skills. Vaa’i is mobile and multiskilled for a lock, so is Holland. Finau is a formidable runner and tackler, and is a genuine lineout option. Suafoa has great potential as a blindside/lock reserve. Peter Lakai can cover all three loose roles.

 

So maybe: 4) Vaa’i, 5) Holland, 6) Finau, 7) Savea, 8) Sititi, 19) Suafoa, 20) Lakai?

5 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Northern sides would toil in Super Rugby? The numbers say different Northern sides would toil in Super Rugby? The numbers say different
Search