Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Report: All Blacks turn down proposal to play exhibition test against Springboks in Dubai

(Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)

The All Blacks reportedly turned down the chance to play the Springboks in Dubai in what would have been a warm-up clash before South Africa’s three-test series against the British and Irish Lions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Earlier this week, World Rugby confirmed the fixtures of its July test schedule, whereby the All Blacks will host Fiji across two tests on July 10 and July 17, while there are plans to play either Samoa or Tonga in Hamilton or Auckland on July 3.

The Springboks, meanwhile, were confirmed to host Georgia across two tests on July 3 and July 10 before the 2019 World Cup champions square off against the Lions in Johannesburg and Cape Town between July 24 and August 7.

Video Spacer

The Crusaders do it again, David Havili as an All Blacks 12, and who missed the Lions squad? | Aotearoa Rugby Pod | RugbyPass

Video Spacer

The Crusaders do it again, David Havili as an All Blacks 12, and who missed the Lions squad? | Aotearoa Rugby Pod | RugbyPass

However, according to report from the Daily Maverick, SA Rugby was close to coming to an agreement with New Zealand Rugby [NZR] to play a one-off fixture in Dubai to prepare for the Lions tour.

The Daily Maverick reports that NZR seriously considered the offer, but ultimately declined as due to New Zealand’s strict COVID-19 travel restrictions that requires travellers into the country to undergo a 14-day quarantine period in a managed isolation facility.

Had NZR accepted the proposal, the All Blacks would not have been able to fulfil its commitments to play Fiji, which was already on its schedule.

Instead, the Springboks will face Georgia in South Africa for the first time in what will be the two nations’ first meeting since their maiden encounter at the 2003 World Cup in Australia, a match the Springboks won 46-19.

ADVERTISEMENT

With concerns around the competitiveness of the Georgian side ahead of such a significant series against the Lions, SA Rugby also approached Japan about the possibility of a warm-up test, according to the Daily Maverick.

The Brave Blossoms also declined, though, as the Daily Maverick reports they were not eager to travel back to Japan via South Africa due to COVID-19 restrictions.

Jamie Joseph’s side are also set to face the Lions themselves in an historic one-off clash in Edinburgh on June 26.

With both the All Blacks and Japan unavailable to play the Springboks, and the likes of the Wallabies, Los Pumas, England and France all locked in with their own fixtures, SA Rugby considered Georgia as the best available option.

ADVERTISEMENT

Georgia, ranked 12th on the World Rugby rankings, were due to tour South Africa during last year’s July test window, but those plans were scuppered due to the outbreak of the pandemic.

Listen to the latest episode of the Aotearoa Rugby Pod below:

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 5 hours ago
What is the future of rugby in 2025?

Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol! Briiiiiiiiiiiiiiiistol!


It's incredible to see the boys playing like this. Back to the form that saw them finish on top of the regular season and beat Toulon to win the challenge cup. Ibitoye and Ravouvou doing a cracking Piutau/Radradra impression.


It's abundantly clear that Borthwick and Wigglesworth need to transform the England attack and incorporate some of the Bears way. Unfortunately until the Bears are competing in Europe, the old criticisms will still be used.. we failed to fire any punches against La Rochelle and Leinster which goes to show there is still work to do but both those sides are packed full of elite players so it's not the fairest comparison to expect Bristol to compete with them. I feel Bristol are on the way up though and the best is yet to come. Tom Jordan next year is going to be obscene.


Test rugby is obviously a different beast and does Borthwick have enough time with the players to develop the level of skill the Bears plays have? Even if he wanted to? We should definitely be able to see some progress, Scotland have certainly managed it. England aren't going to start throwing the ball around like that but England's attack looks prehistoric by comparison, I hope they take some inspiration from the clarity and freedom of expression shown by the Bears (and Scotland - who keep beating us, by the way!). Bristol have the best attack in the premiership, it'd be mad for England to ignore it because it doesn't fit with the Borthwick and Wigglesworth idea of how test rugby should be played. You gotta use what is available to you. Sadly I think England will try reluctantly to incorporate some of these ideas and end up even more confused and lacking identity than ever. At the moment England have two teams, they have 14 players and Marcus Smith. Marcus sticks out as a sore thumb in a team coached to play in a manner ideologically opposed to the way he plays rugby, does the Bears factor confuse matters further? I just have no confidence in Borthers and Wiggles.


Crazy to see the Prem with more ball in play than SR!

7 Go to comments
J
JW 9 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

In another recent article I tried to argue for a few key concept changes for EPCR which I think could light the game up in the North.


First, I can't remember who pointed out the obvious elephant in the room (a SA'n poster?), it's a terrible time to play rugby in the NH, and especially your pinnacle tournament. It's been terrible watching with seemingly all the games I wanted to watch being in the dark, hardly able to see what was going on. The Aviva was the only stadium I saw that had lights that could handle the miserable rain. If the global appeal is there, they could do a lot better having day games.


They other primary idea I thuoght would benefit EPCR most, was more content. The Prem could do with it and the Top14 could do with something more important than their own league, so they aren't under so much pressure to sell games. The quality over quantity approach.


Trim it down to two 16 team EPCR competitions, and introduce a third for playing amongst the T2 sides, or the bottom clubs in each league should simply be working on being better during the EPCR.


Champions Cup is made up of league best 15 teams, + 1, the Challenge Cup winner. Without a reason not to, I'd distribute it evenly based on each leauge, dividing into thirds and rounded up, 6 URC 5 Top14 4 English. Each winner (all four) is #1 rank and I'd have a seeding round or two for the other 12 to determine their own brackets for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th. I'd then hold a 6 game pool, home and away, with consecutive of each for those games that involve SA'n teams. Preferrably I'd have a regional thing were all SA'n teams were in the same pool but that's a bit complex for this simple idea.


That pool round further finalises the seeding for knockout round of 16. So #1 pool has essentially duked it out for finals seeding already (better venue planning), and to see who they go up against 16, 15,etc etc. Actually I think I might prefer a single pool round for seeding, and introduce the home and away for Ro16, quarters, and semis (stuffs up venue hire). General idea to produce the most competitive matches possible until the random knockout phase, and fix the random lottery of which two teams get ranked higher after pool play, and also keep the system identical for the Challenge Cup so everthing is succinct. Top T2 side promoted from last year to make 16 in Challenge Cup

207 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Initial Immanuel Feyi-Waboso injury update does not sound promising Initial Immanuel Feyi-Waboso injury update does not sound promising
Search