Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

REPORT: South Africa's Rugby Championship hopes dealt a blow in pulsating Australia draw

Jesse Kriel gets ready to pounce for South Africa

South Africa’s hopes of challenging New Zealand for the Rugby Championship were dealt a blow after a thrilling contest against Australia finished 23-23 in Perth.

ADVERTISEMENT

Having lost twice to the All Blacks in their opening two matches of the tournament, Australia’s chances of winning the title were already scarce but the Springboks made the trip with two wins to their name against Argentina.

It looked a tall task to get a third win as tries from Kurtley Beale – his third of the Championship – and Tatafu Polota-Nau had Australia 20-10 ahead amid wet conditions at nib Stadium.

The momentum swung dramatically back in the visitors’ favour, though, as two Elton Jantjies penalties either side of a converted Malcolm Marx score had the away side leading and dreaming of just a second away win in nine contests against the Wallabies.

But Bernard Foley tied things up once again and, despite a late Springboks push for the line, the match finished all square.

South Africa now travel to New Zealand knowing realistically they must avoid defeat if they are to have a chance of winning the title, while Australia host Argentina looking for a morale-boosting win.

Slippery conditions made for an ugly start with both sides guilty of errors, but Jantjies’ boot put South Africa on the board before Foley responded in kind for the hosts.

ADVERTISEMENT

The match burst into life in the 25th minute, though. Australia lost the ball at the breakdown and Jesse Kriel ultimately ended up collecting his own kick after Michael Hooper and Raymond Rhule clashed shoulders and went to ground during a footrace.

It was a short-lived lead as the Wallabies hit straight back. Israel Folau won the ball back from a short kick-off and Beale collected a poor pass from the breakdown before brilliantly hitting the gap.

Jantjies missed the chance to put the Springboks back in front off the tee, but Foley was on target on the stroke of half-time and Australia stretched the lead after the break when Polota-Nau dotted down from a brilliant driving maul.

Jan Serfontein almost bagged a brilliant breakaway try as the momentum swung in South Africa’s favour, with a Jantjies penalty cutting the deficit before Marx grounded from a rolling maul.

ADVERTISEMENT

Jaco Kriel failed to benefit from a poor Folau error by knocking on before the line, but from the following scrum South Africa earned a penalty from which Jantjies kicked them into the lead.

Foley levelled again with a 30-metre effort shortly after, but Australia remained on the back foot and had to charge down a last-gasp drop-kick attempt from Jantjies in a frantic finish.

ADVERTISEMENT

Cape Town | Leg 1 | Day 2 | HSBC Challenger Series 2025 | Full Day Replay

Gloucester-Hartpury vs Bristol Bears | PWR 2024/25 | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 36 | Six Nations Round 3 Review

Why did Scotland's Finn Russell take the crucial kick from the wrong place? | Whistle Watch

England A vs Ireland A | Full Match Replay

Kubota Spears vs Shizuoka BlueRevs | JRLO 2024/2025 | Full Match Replay

O2 Inside Line: This Rose | Episode 3 | France Week

Watch now: Lomu - The Lost Tapes

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 27 minutes ago
English rugby pundits and fans really need to get a grip

However I think the “if their opponents had scored more points then England would have lost” retrospective is pointless at best and silly at worst.

I completely understand your view on this but England were the worst team in both games and if we're letting the result detract from the evaluation of the performance then we're doing ourselves a disservice. England fans should not get excited because we scraped two fortunate wins, it was a swing in variance and long term that variance will come crashing down on England because they did not play well. Ifs and buts aside I don't think anyone thinks England are better than either France or Scotland. The performance is what matters, results follow performances in the long run.


You could for sure argue that the games they lost they could have won if the bounce of a ball went differently. In none of those narrow loses did England feel considerably the better team and there weren't moments you'd chalk up to massive amounts of fortune. In the two narrow loses they very much felt like the worst team and there were many moments where the rub of the green went England's way. Ultimately, they've had an uptick in variance which will average itself out to more losses because they're not good. These two results don't mean anything has been fixed. As I say, performances are what I'm looking for, not results, the results come if the performances are good and right now the performance in every game has more or less been dire.

4 Go to comments
R
RedWarriors 49 minutes ago
France change two for Ireland but stick with 7-1 bench tactic

I saw Ben Kayser saying the French players would be livid and motivated due to the Ringrose ban etc. Galthie and Ntamack know the exact reason why the bans differ and one must assume the French squad does also. Galthie is playing silly buggers.


As the red card for Ringrose fell right before a fallow week, he WAS released by Leinster who provided accompanying substantiation. Precedent shows club matches are included in bans in such cases. For Galthie/France alone precedents are Atonio (2023), Haouas (2023), and Danty (2024). Club matches counted for bans.


Ntamack was different because France were due to play a match the following week (versus England). Therefore Galthie COULD NOT release Ntamack. In the written decision, Galthie tried to argue that Ntamack would be released after England but had to admit that a lot depended on outcome of England match which was unknowable. On top of that Ntamack was the starting outhalf for France.

The precedents for the Ntamack situation are O’Mahony (2021) where club games did not count, and Willemse (2024) where Willemse had a 10 match ban reduced to 4 and club matches DID count for the suspension.


So Galthie has had three cases like Ringrose (Atonio, Haouas, Danty) with same outcome as Ringrose. He had one previous case like Ntamack where he succeeded, but he was aware of and even mentioned the O’Mahony case where all the ban was for International matches.


In a nutshell. Why were those players allowed club matches to count? Because they WERE released for the club games.

Why did club matches not count for O’Mahony and Ntamack? Because they WERE NOT released for the club games which meant they could not reach the evidential threshold required.


Why is he demanding a World Rugby inquiry when he knows the reasons for such decisions, has known for years, has benefitted for years? France know this and Ireland knows this.

Dupont and the French team are honorable. This wont sit well with them. I would argue this is a bigger motivator for Ireland than for France.


Conclusion: Galthie is under serious pressure to win this match

31 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Will Vern Cotter succumb to second season Blues in Auckland? Will Vern Cotter succumb to second season Blues in Auckland?
Search