Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Revealed: How the new All Blacks XV will impact eligibility

(Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

When New Zealand Rugby (NZR) unveiled the new second-tier All Blacks side earlier in the week, wider responses were mixed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Some saw the new squad as an extra carrot to dangle in front of developing players in order to keep them in the country and groom them for greater things.

Others questioned the watering-down of the All Blacks brand – which already includes the national side, the Maori All Blacks and the All Blacks Sevens sides – and whether the new team was simply a commercial exercise that will also prevent foreign sides from benefitting from NZ-produced players.

The reality likely falls somewhere in the middle.

Absolutely, the new All Blacks XV will generate revenue growth for NZR – but it’s difficult to argue that’s a bad thing, at least from New Zealand’s point of view.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

And there’s no question that a new squad will help give players that are not quite ready for the big leagues the taste of international rugby.

The bigger concern, especially from non-New Zealanders, is how the new side could affect players that leave NZ but still want to play international football for another national side which they qualify for.

Each national union can nominate a second side to capture player eligibility. For some years, New Zealand operated a New Zealand A side (which later was rebranded to the Junior All Blacks) which would tie players to NZ for the international game. That side hasn’t played a fixture in over 10 years.

ADVERTISEMENT

The new All Blacks XV will likely replace the Junior All Blacks as New Zealand’s second team and capture players’ eligibility in the future – which could harm Pacific Island and other foreign nations.

RugbyPass understands, however, that the new side won’t tie players to New Zealand – at least in 2020.

Under the World Rugby regulations, a nation can, on an annual basis, change their second nominated side. The NZR have not elected to make this change – at least for 2020 – which means that any players who represent the All Blacks XV this season will still be able to play for a foreign nation in the future.

Whether this is intentional on NZR’s behalf or the union simply ran out of time to make the change is unknown. It’s also unknown whether the All Blacks XV will become New Zealand’s next senior representative team in the future or if the (effectively non-existent) Junior All Blacks will continue to hold that mantle.

ADVERTISEMENT

This will come as a relief to many around the world as it will mean players who never quite reach the heights of running out for the All Blacks  (but still come agonisingly close) will still have the opportunity to play for another national side down the line.

WATCH: Check out all of the incredible action coming up in March on RugbyPass

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 2 hours ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath Fissler Confidential: One England international in, one out for Bath
Search