Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

RFU should pay up if Borthwick really wants Nick Evans – Andy Goode

(Photo by Alex Davidson/The RFU Collection via Getty Images )

If Steve Borthwick really wants Nick Evans as part of his England coaching team for the Rugby World Cup, he should be there but the RFU needs to pay up. The loan for the Guinness Six Nations was one thing but another similar agreement for the lengthy period spanning the World Cup and all the preparations for it would have been taking the biscuit.

ADVERTISEMENT

Harlequins will have been financially compensated and would be again but another cobbled-together temporary situation shouldn’t be necessary. It isn’t ideal for anyone and a quick glance at Quins’ results since January shows how damaging it has been for them.

They picked up just three points from a possible 30 in the Gallagher Premiership between him being announced as the England attack coach and last weekend’s win over Newcastle.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Perhaps the transition has been managed better at Leicester Tigers, who did suffer badly in the immediate aftermath of Borthwick and Kevin Sinfield’s departures but have since bounced back with six straight league wins since the start of February.

Richard Wigglesworth is joining Borthwick’s England coaching team at the end of this season but he was not released for the Six Nations. Instead, he held the fort impressively at Tigers and they are looking good for the playoffs.

Related

I’m sure Harlequins will recognise that they should have managed Evans’ absence better but they shouldn’t have to endure the same short-term upheaval again and be searching for the best way to just plug the gap until he comes back and gets them ticking over again.

If Borthwick wants Evans, the RFU should pay him out of his contract and get him on board properly. That way Harlequins have certainty and can plan accordingly but it is also in Evans’ best interests and the England players will have greater clarity over the plan moving forwards.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s a tricky job building your coaching team on the hoof while competing in a Six Nations and preparing for a World Cup but we could do with a bit more clarity generally in that area as coaches are signing up but no job titles are being disclosed.

We know Aled Walters will be head of strength and conditioning and Ian Peel is rumoured to be coming in from Saracens as a forwards specialist – but the rest is less clear.

Wigglesworth worked as attack coach under Borthwick at Leicester but his remit with England hasn’t been confirmed and maybe the head coach had other plans for him if he is trying to get Evans involved in the World Cup… and then there is Felix Jones.

He isn’t arriving from the Springboks until after the World Cup but is currently working as their attack coach. He was a defence consultant when he moved there initially but Sinfield has that role locked down with England, so it’s a fair assumption that he will be involved with the attack.

ADVERTISEMENT

Clearly, getting the coaching talent signed up is a good thing but how they all slot together isn’t immediately obvious and Evans deserves to be more than just a stop-gap.

He needs to be trusted and given the reins fully too. The former All Blacks fly-half has done wonders with Quins’ attack in recent years but we didn’t see much of the speed and style they are renowned for with England in this year’s Six Nations.

Related

A bit more pragmatism is probably required at international level and it’s tough to hit the ground running when you are appointed at such short notice, but it’s fair to question whether he was constrained by a bit too much rigidity in the structures put in place by Borthwick.

Evidently, Evans impressed or he wouldn’t be getting approached to continue on at the World Cup but his philosophy is centred around the delivery of lightning quick ball (LQB) to create holes and space out wide.

There isn’t much point in appointing him if you aren’t going to give him the scope to implement that or if the game plan is heading in a different direction.

England had more territory than any other team in this year’s Six Nations but only Italy and Wales scored fewer tries – and as many as eight of the 13 tries they did score started with a scrum or a lineout.

Related

Add to that, their average ruck speed of 3.77 seconds was the slowest in the tournament and they made the fewest linebreaks but kicked more in play than anyone else and it didn’t have the numbers or feel of an Evans attack.

I thought he was a great appointment in January – and I still do – but England shouldn’t be trying to get him on the cheap and destabilising his club in the process. The RFU should pay him out of his contract and allow him to fully focus straight away on the job of finally getting England’s attack to click at the World Cup.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
C
Coach 612 days ago

England need to get rid of Poortvliet first. He is the catalyst that breaks everything down, not up. Slow and cumbersome. Playing against him must be awesome for the opposition. Opposition can have a smoke and a cuppa while he makes up his mind ..

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 46 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

144 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC Leinster player ratings vs Connacht | 2024/25 URC
Search