Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

RFU statement: 2022/23 annual report, operating profit of £4m

(Photo by Alex Davidson/RFU for Getty Images)

The RFU have praised robust financial management for delivering an operating profit of £4m for 2022/23, even though that figure is £11m less than the previous year. The governing body of rugby in England published its accounts for last season on Friday, explaining that increased revenues than in 2021/22 enabled it to pay off all the debt accumulated in the years impacted by covid.

ADVERTISEMENT

A statement read: “The RFU 2022/23 annual report shows significantly higher reported revenues for the year at £221.4m (£189.1m in prior year), increased investment in rugby at £99.4m (£77.4m in previous year) and an operating profit of £4m (£15m in previous year).

“During the year all debt from covid-impacted years has been paid off and the RFU has £24.9m in cash and £25m in deposits. Exceeding targeted profits to reserves, the union ended the financial year with a strong P&L reserve of £123.3m.

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

Video Spacer

Rugbypass TV

Watch rugby on demand, from exclusive shows and documentaries to extended highlights from RWC 2023. Anywhere. Anytime. All for free!

Join us

“Rugby finances work in four-year cycles based on the number of men’s home internationals staged at Twickenham Stadium. 22/23 is the third year in the Rugby World Cup cycle when there are the highest number of home internationals at Twickenham Stadium and, as such, these higher revenues were expected.

“Next year, with England’s autumn internationals replaced by the men’s Rugby World Cup, the 2023/24 annual results will show a significant loss.

Related

“The high match profile in 2022/23 explains much of the increase in revenue compared to 2021/22 (seven men’s international fixtures versus five).

“Ticket income increased to £48.4m (£33.7m in previous year) and the world record crowd that attended the Red Roses’ victory over France in the Six Nations contributed c.£1m of revenue. Revenues from hospitality and catering reached their highest levels ever at £70.8m (£61.5m in previous year).

ADVERTISEMENT

“The two other largest revenue streams are broadcast and sponsorship revenues. Broadcast revenue fell slightly to £40.9m (£43.6m in previous year) and remain behind pre-pandemic levels, and sponsorship revenue increased from £24.1m in the previous year to £25.9m. Overall, rugby investment increased by 28 per cent year-on-year to £99.4m (£77.4m in previous year).

“Investment in the community game increased 52 per cent from 2021/22 (£31.1m vs £20.4m). The increase was partly due to the resumption of more programmes post-pandemic, and partly due to securing additional external Sport England funding, with £3.2m secured for Rugby World Cup 2025 impact projects, and £1.2m for the governance and business transformation project.

“Community game investment is made up of £7.4m of funding (for leagues, CBs, club insurances and the Injured Players Foundation), £8.2m of people costs, £1.5m of depreciation on artificial grass pitches, £9.7m of programme investment, and £4.3m of Sport England investment into Rugby World Cup 25 impact and governance and transformation programme investment.

“Increases are across all areas of investment, including people costs, community game insurances, CB funding and various programmes including ‘Project Phoenix’, a project focussed on increasing adult male participation numbers.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Professional rugby investment increased 20 per cent from £57.0m to £68.3m. This consists of club funding (including men’s and women’s Premiership and men’s Championship); England teams and programmes (including player fees and contracts, XVs and 7s programmes, pathway, and kit), and other (sports medicine, player welfare, match officials, rugby operations, events and competitions and, in 2022/23, the professional game elements of the governance and business transformation project).

“Most of the year-on-year increase in club funding (£31.1m vs £26.7m) has driven increased payments to Premiership clubs under the Professional Game Agreement. The increase in investment in our England teams (£25.5m vs £20.8m) is due to several factors.

“It includes the costs associated with changing the England men’s coaching team; the costs of the Red Roses attending a Rugby World Cup (both player costs and logistics); and the increased costs of the men’s team due both to a longer autumn window and the first Rugby World Cup camp falling in June.

“As a result of monies received from CVC for selling a share of future broadcast revenues, this and some sponsorship rights have been reduced in the short term. The RFU is committed to driving long-term growth by using these proceeds which will bring in £90m in capital over four years to invest in revenue-generating projects that support the game in England.

“Areas targeted for ‘strategic growth fund’ investment include the women’s game, stadium master-planning, digital transformation, and development of revenue generating projects (including assets) for the community game.”

CEO Bill Sweeney said: “Wasps, Worcester, and London Irish going into administration was the single most defining aspect of the men’s professional game last season. The after-effects of covid, levels of debt, and the economic environment brutally exposing difficulties for business models with existing challenges.

“In a very difficult financial environment, the RFU achieved an operating profit of £4m due to robust financial management. The coming years will continue to be challenging with inflationary pressure on our costs, our revenues being under pressure from reduced discretionary spend, and the recovery of corporate confidence. We will continue to implement strong cost control and prudent fiscal management.”

Sue Day, the RFU’s chief operating officer and chief finance officer, added: “It has been a challenging few years financially for rugby in England. The RFU is facing these challenges too, but from a position of stability because of our strong financial discipline.

“It is critical that we maintain that discipline so that we can continue to support all elements of the game now and in the future. We have made an operating profit in the year of £4m, but are facing challenging future economic conditions, and so it remains very important to manage our finances very tightly.”

  • Click here to read the entire 104-page 2022/23 RFU annual report
ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

5 Comments
J
JD Kiwi 355 days ago

“Robust financial management” = cutting funding to the grassroots and championship while Sweeney's fat cat salary rises by another £16k

C
Clive 355 days ago

Look on the bright side, three less Prem clubs to weigh out this year so that is 15 bar or so in the bin, plus the side that finished 3rd in the World will draw more more corporate nobbers than the losers who went off to France. Multiple millions to get rid of Eddie Gump who should never have had a new contract and £20 million plus to fund the women’s club game where crowds rarely exceed a thousand and most of the players are not EQ.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 3 hours ago
'Passionate reunion of France and New Zealand shows Fabien Galthie is wrong to rest his stars'

Ok, managed to read the full article..

... New Zealand’s has only 14 and the professional season is all over within four months. In France, club governance is the responsibility of an independent organisation [the Ligue Nationale de Rugby or LNR] which is entirely separate from the host union [the Fédération Française de Rugby or FFR]. Down south New Zealand Rugby runs the provincial and the national game.

That is the National Provincial Championship, a competition of 14 representative union based teams run through the SH international window and only semi professional (paid only during it's running). It is run by NZR and goes for two and a half months.


Super Rugby is a competition involving 12 fully professional teams, of which 5 are of New Zealand eligibility, and another joint administered team of Pacific Island eligibility, with NZR involvement. It was a 18 week competition this year, so involved (randomly chosen I believe) extra return fixtures (2 or 3 home and away derbys), and is run by Super Rugby Pacific's own independent Board (or organisation). The teams may or may not be independently run and owned (note, this does not necessarily mean what you think of as 'privately owned').


LNR was setup by FFR and the French Government to administer the professional game in France. In New Zealand, the Players Association and Super Rugby franchises agreed last month to not setup their own governance structure for professional rugby and re-aligned themselves with New Zealand Rugby. They had been proposing to do something like the English model, I'm not sure how closely that would have been aligned to the French system but it did not sound like it would have French union executive representation on it like the LNR does.

In the shaky isles the professional pyramid tapers to a point with the almighty All Blacks. In France the feeling for country is no more important than the sense of fierce local identity spawned at myriad clubs concentrated in the southwest. Progress is achieved by a nonchalant shrug and the wide sweep of nuanced negotiation, rather than driven from the top by a single intense focus.

Yes, it is pretty much a 'representative' selection system at every level, but these union's are having to fight for their existence against the regime that is NZR, and are currently going through their own battle, just as France has recently as I understand it. A single focus, ala the French game, might not be the best outcome for rugby as a whole.


For pure theatre, it is a wonderful article so far. I prefer 'Ntamack New Zealand 2022' though.

The young Crusader still struggles to solve the puzzle posed by the shorter, more compact tight-heads at this level but he had no problem at all with Colombe.

It was interesting to listen to Manny during an interview on Maul or Nothing, he citied that after a bit of banter with the All Black's he no longer wanted one of their jersey's after the game. One of those talks was an eye to eye chat with Tamaiti Williams, there appear to be nothing between the lock and prop, just a lot of give and take. I thought TW angled in and caused Taylor to pop a few times, and that NZ were lucky to be rewarded.

f you have a forward of 6ft 8ins and 145kg, and he is not at all disturbed by a dysfunctional set-piece, you are in business.

He talked about the clarity of the leadership that helped alleviate any need for anxiety at the predicaments unfolding before him. The same cannot be said for New Zealand when they had 5 minutes left to retrieve a match winning penalty, I don't believe. Did the team in black have much of a plan at any point in the game? I don't really call an autonomous 10 vehicle they had as innovative. I think Razor needs to go back to the dealer and get a new game driver on that one.

Vaa’i is no match for his power on the ground. Even in reverse, Meafou is like a tractor motoring backwards in low gear, trampling all in its path.

Vaa'i actually stops him in his tracks. He gets what could have been a dubious 'tackle' on him?

A high-level offence will often try to identify and exploit big forwards who can be slower to reload, and therefore vulnerable to two quick plays run at them consecutively.

Yes he was just standing on his haunches wasn't he? He mentioned that in the interview, saying that not only did you just get up and back into the line to find the opposition was already set and running at you they also hit harder than anything he'd experienced in the Top 14. He was referring to New Zealands ultra-physical, burst-based Super style of course, which he was more than a bit surprised about. I don't blame him for being caught out.


He still sent the obstruction back to the repair yard though!

What wouldn’t the New Zealand rugby public give to see the likes of Mauvaka and Meafou up front..

Common now Nick, don't go there! Meafou showed his Toulouse shirt and promptly got his citizenship, New Zealand can't have him, surely?!?


As I have said before with these subjects, really enjoy your enthusiasm for their contribution on the field and I'd love to see more of their shapes running out for Vern Cotter and the like styled teams.

287 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Tyrone Green decision has huge bearing on his international future Tyrone Green decision has huge bearing on his international future
Search