Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

RFU statement: Tom Curry and Bongi Mbonambi

(Photo by Aurelien Meunier/Getty Images)

The RFU have given its full support to England back row Tom Curry for raising the racially abusive behaviour he allegedly experienced when playing in last Saturday’s Rugby World Cup semi-final.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was announced on Thursday that a World Rugby investigation had closed as they found insufficient evidence at this time to proceed with charges against Springboks hooker Bongi Mbonambi.

The statement read: “The RFU fully support Tom Curry in raising the racially abusive behaviour he experienced whilst playing for England against South Africa.

Video Spacer

Big Jim Show – World Cup Final

Join Big Jim and guests before and after the final, live this Saturday on RugbyPass TV from 19:10 BST

Watch Free

Video Spacer

Big Jim Show – World Cup Final

Join Big Jim and guests before and after the final, live this Saturday on RugbyPass TV from 19:10 BST

Watch Free

“During last Saturday’s match between England and South Africa, Tom Curry reported to the referee that he had been racially abused by Mbongeni Mbonambi.

“The subsequent World Rugby investigation were informed by Tom Curry that he had also been the victim of the same abuse, from the same player, in the 2022 autumn Test. World Rugby have today announced their decision not to bring charges in respect of either incident.

Fixture
Rugby World Cup
Argentina
23 - 26
Full-time
England
All Stats and Data

“The RFU are deeply disappointed by the decision taken by World Rugby. The decision not to put the evidence before an independent disciplinary panel has denied the disciplinary process the opportunity to hear Tom Curry’s voice and to independently assess his account of these serious events, together with the other available evidence.

“In their continued full support of Tom, the RFU together with the England squad, condemn the disgusting abuse he and his family has received on social media as a result of his having had the courage to put unacceptable behaviour that has no place in society or on the rugby field, in the public eye.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Abuse of any kind is not acceptable and goes against the core values of rugby.

“It is important that it is safe and acceptable for everyone involved in rugby union to raise concerns, and the RFU continue to encourage everyone to report any unacceptable behaviour in the game.”

Despite the online abuse, Curry was named on Wednesday by England coach Steve Borthwick to start this Friday’s bronze medal match in Paris versus Argentina.

Mbonambi, meanwhile, was included on Thursday morning in the Springboks XV to start Saturday’s World Cup final versus New Zealand.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

49 Comments
P
Petrus78 417 days ago

Shame…..poor Curry……Bongi is nasty to him……RFU is deeply disappointed…….lol……I thought you would be used to disappointed by this time…..😉

J
Jon 422 days ago

Curry must be the biggest c*** if he’s been called out twice now. He certainly looks it!

F
Flankly 422 days ago

“The RFU fully support Tom Curry in raising the racially abusive behaviour he experienced whilst playing for England against South Africa.”

Well there is a ton of tape from the 38 cameras and 16 microphones, plus plenty of witnesses. And, whilst it is hard to prove a negative, this is pretty close. The cameras were not magically switched off at any point.

Many sensible people will reasonably conclude that this was a cynical move by Curry. And many people that understand the impact of false allegations will sympathize with Bongi.

Someone should explain the presumption of innocence to the RFU folks.

H
Henrik 422 days ago

  • Tom Curry reported to the referee that he had been racially abused by Mbongeni Mbonambi +
what I heard was the following: “Sir, sir, what if their hooker calls me a white c@#$?”
to me that is stating a POSSIBILITY in the future, not a factual allegation of something which actually had happened ….

strange story …..

s
sean 422 days ago

I still wantbto discuss the fact that an English public school tosser wants to claim racial prejudice…. That's like HF Verwoerd claiming a moral superiority because Jacob Zuma is corrupt.

F
Flankly 422 days ago

We started with an extremely implausible allegation, and ended with an even more implausible "no evidence". It does not reflect well on Curry.

If it took place then Curry presumably could identify the moment in the game. Given that both players are forwards it is more or less certain that this would have happened close to play, and there are 38 TV cameras in the semi-finals, many of which would have been trained on near-the-ball action, so they would have caught the moment from various angles. There are 16 pitch microphones and 5 more atmosphere microphones. Additionally there were witnesses all around. It's not that there is no evidence, but that none of the huge corpus of video, audio and witness evidence supports the allegation.

Abuse is never OK, and we should all stand by Curry in that regard. Nonetheless, his actions are hard to interpret in a way that is complimentary to him. Many will look at this story and reasonably conclude that it was probably cynical behavior on Curry's part.

M
Michael 422 days ago

British press doing a great job at turning Curry into a victim spearheaded by the oh so self-righteous but simultaneously dirtiest cesspit Dailymail.

"The RFU fully support Tom Curry in raising the racially abusive behaviour he experienced whilst playing for England against South Africa." That is pretty slanderous and crucially, the word 'alleged' is missing.

s
sean 422 days ago

Oh shame poor Curry feel heart sorry for the guy that deliberately tried to ruin a man’s reputation to get an advantage in the scrum, next the RFU will campaign to ban the Afrikaans language as it offends their players boo hoo

S
Sumkunn Tsadmiova 422 days ago

“The RFU are deeply disappointed by the decision taken by World Rugby. The decision not to put the evidence before an independent disciplinary panel has denied the disciplinary process the opportunity to hear Tom Curry’s voice and to independently assess his account of these serious events, together with the other available evidence.” That’s absolutely dreadful. “…to independently assess…” is a split infinitive. Awful grammar.

f
finn 422 days ago

ABuSe of Any KInd iS noT ACCEptAblE anD goES AGaInsT the CoRe ValuEs OF rUgBy

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 10 minutes ago
Does South Africa have a future in European competition?

I rated Lowe well enough to be an AB. Remember we were picking the likes of George Bridge above such players so theres no disputing a lot of bad decisions have been made by those last two coaches. Does a team like the ABs need a finicky winger who you have to adapt and change a lot of your style with to get benefit from? No, not really. But he still would have been a basic improvement on players like even Savea at the tail of his career, Bridge, and could even have converted into the answer of replacing Beauden at the back. Instead we persisted with NMS, Naholo, Havili, Reece, all players we would have cared even less about losing and all because Rieko had Lowe's number 11 jersey nailed down.


He was of course only 23 when he decided to leave, it was back in the beggining of the period they had started retaining players (from 2018 onwards I think, they came out saying theyre going to be more aggressive at some point). So he might, all of them, only just missed out.


The main point that Ed made is that situations like Lowe's, Aki's, JGP's, aren't going to happen in future. That's a bit of a "NZ" only problem, because those players need to reach such a high standard to be chosen by the All Blacks, were as a country like Ireland wants them a lot earlier like that. This is basically the 'ready in 3 years' concept Ireland relied on, versus the '5 years and they've left' concept' were that player is now ready to be chosen by the All Blacks (given a contract to play Super, ala SBW, and hopefully Manu).


The 'mercenary' thing that will take longer to expire, and which I was referring to, is the grandparents rule. The new kids coming through now aren't going to have as many gp born overseas, so the amount of players that can leave with a prospect of International rugby offer are going to drop dramatically at some point. All these kiwi fellas playing for a PI, is going to stop sadly.


The new era problem that will replace those old concerns is now French and Japanese clubs (doing the same as NRL teams have done for decades by) picking kids out of school. The problem here is not so much a national identity one, than it is a farm system where 9 in 10 players are left with nothing. A stunted education and no support in a foreign country (well they'll get kicked out of those countries were they don't in Australia).


It's the same sort of situation were NZ would be the big guy, but there weren't many downsides with it. The only one I can think was brought up but a poster on this site, I can't recall who it was, but he seemed to know a lot of kids coming from the Islands weren't really given the capability to fly back home during school xms holidays etc. That is probably something that should be fixed by the union. Otherwise getting someone like Fakatava over here for his last year of school definitely results in NZ being able to pick the cherries off the top but it also allows that player to develop and be able to represent Tonga and under age and possibly even later in his career. Where as a kid being taken from NZ is arguably going to be worse off in every respect other than perhaps money. Not going to develop as a person, not going to develop as a player as much, so I have a lotof sympathy for NZs case that I don't include them in that group but I certainly see where you're coming from and it encourages other countries to think they can do the same while not realising they're making a much worse experience/situation.

143 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales Return of 30-something brigade provides welcome tonic for Wales
Search