Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

RFU statement: Professional game partnership, Championship update

An England team huddle during the recent Guinness Six Nations (Photo by Dan Mullan/The RFU Collection via Getty Images)

The RFU have provided an update on its men’s professional game partnership, explaining that key elements of this new deal have been agreed. They also gave the latest on the status of negotiations regarding the Championship and its proposed revamp.

ADVERTISEMENT

The update emerged on Friday following the latest RFU council meeting. A statement read: “Following extensive collaboration with Premiership Rugby, Premiership clubs and Rugby Players Association (RPA) over the past 18 months, the key elements of a co-created deal have been agreed for the men’s professional game partnership (MPGP), representing a transformation of the professional men’s game that will set it up for a successful future.

“Through the agreement, we are: Improving the men’s performance system, providing better access and management of top players to enhance performance, while increasing playing opportunities for developing talent;

Video Spacer

URC Head of Match Officials Tappe Henning reveals some stunning red-card statistics

Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 4:58
Loaded: 0.00%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 4:58
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
    • en (Main), selected
    Video Spacer

    URC Head of Match Officials Tappe Henning reveals some stunning red-card statistics

    “Establishing a new aligned governance structure, the men’s professional rugby board, reducing conflicts and improving decision-making; And Stabilising the professional club game while safeguarding the RFU’s financial position through a funding agreement comprising two, four-year terms.

    “Council approved the delegation of specified regulatory decisions to a new men’s professional rugby Board following RFU Board approval of the same, as well as the financial commitments under the agreement.

    Related

    “The RFU, Premiership Rugby and RPA will formally announce the signature of and detail of the full Men’s Professional Game Partnership together after the summer tour.

    “Council also approved the mechanism for promotion and relegation which will be a two-match home and away play-off between the bottom placed Premiership club and the winner of the Championship/Tier 2, provided that that latter club meets the minimum standards criteria in place at the relevant time.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “This continues to allow for promotion and relegation, better provides a mechanism to determine on-field competitiveness and takes into consideration the financial challenges of clubs in both leagues.

    “Since February 2023, and as part of our transformation of the men’s professional game through the MPGP, the RFU, Championship club committee and Premiership Rugby Limited have been working to develop a reimagined Tier 2.

    “The objective is to create a second tier that supports the English system by developing young English talent, whilst supporting the clubs to become financially sustainable by growing local audiences and increasing the value in the league.

    “In April 2024, council approved the principles of a new governance structure, the minimum operating standards, and the principle of Tier 2 comprising 14 clubs from 2025/26.

    ADVERTISEMENT

    “Since April, we have been working with the extended Championship executive team to reach final agreement on the following components of the league: Funding; Delegation to a new Tier 2 board; Timeline to complete the MOS self-validation process; Competition structure.

    “Council were updated on the progress made since its April meeting and members approved the revised minimum operating standards self-validation timeline and final delegation of authority to the Tier 2 board.

    “The final decision on the exact format of the 14-team league will be made by the Tier 2 board no later than August 1, 2024, with the mechanism for any new teams in the league to be decided by council and announced ahead of the new season.

    “This timeline preserves the commitment that we have made to ensure that all clubs have at least 12 months’ notice of any major changes to the RFU leagues.”

    Related

    ADVERTISEMENT

    Classic Wallabies vs British & Irish Legends | First Match | Full Match Replay

    Did the Lions loosies get away with murder? And revisiting the Springboks lift | Whistle Watch

    The First Test, Visiting The Great Barrier Reef & Poetry with Pierre | Ep 6: The Ultimate Test

    KOKO Show | July 22nd | Full Throttle with Brisbane Test Review and Melbourne Preview

    New Zealand v South Africa | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    USA vs England | Men's International | Full Match Replay

    France v Argentina | World Rugby U20 Championship | Extended Highlights

    Lions Share | Episode 4

    Trending on RugbyPass

    Comments

    0 Comments
    Be the first to comment...

    Join free and tell us what you really think!

    Sign up for free
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Latest Features

    Comments on RugbyPass

    N
    NH 47 minutes ago
    Harness Skelton's might and move Sua'ali'i: How the Wallabies can fix things for Test two

    Nice one Nick. I was a fan of Joe’s appointment and think in general he has done well, and I even think the game plan last week was ok, but I am not sold he has gotten his selections right for this series. As everyone has detailed, the pack was too small last week. This week, he has brought in skelton and valetini which is an improvement physicality-wise but now the back 5 is out of balance with only one legitimate lineout option in Frost. The wallabies were poor in the lineout and it meant they couldn’t get into the lions 22 in the 1st half. Its also where most WBs tries originate from. Are they going to opt for a scrum every penalty they get? 3 man lineouts? And as you show, Suaalii is simply too hesitant in D. I guess drifting is better than biting in and taking yourself out of play, but he doesn’t do much more in that last clip. Maxy has 2 involvements in that play, suaalii none. At this rate, Chieka was quicker and better at integrating marika who had more to do to learn the game, than Joe with suaalii.


    Do you think that Joe is hesitant to put Suaalii on the wing because he would be exposed in the backfield in terms of kicking, positioning etc? This is the only justification I can think of and also maybe why he has picked the likes of max, potter and kellaway over the likes of daugunu, pietsch and toole. The difference in selection philosophy between schmidt and rennie has come into clear focus to me recently in terms of brain vs braun, power vs graft, workrate vs impact. In my opinion, Schmidt needed to make a hard decision on starting skelton vs a backrow that had bobby and wilson in it and he hasn’t done that. I also feel like he is almost picking a team to minimise the loss rather than win. I think starting a tate, or a pietsch, or bell could’ve signalled some more intent.

    4 Go to comments
    LONG READ
    LONG READ Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us Competing interests and rotated squads: What the 'player welfare summer' is really telling us